Topper wrote: ↑Wed Mar 19, 2025 4:39 pm
It has been a long time coming in this digital age. Fewer media have been travelling in recent campaigns. Digital resources to participate will be made available as will a 2-3 day leadtime on locations of events.
You can certainly look at it that way - and perhaps it will continue. However, don't you find it strange that only the Conservatives are going in this direction?
Liberals, Bloc and NDP are all allowing media to travel with their leaders.
Conservatives will provide media/broadcasters with tape of events they aren't able to attend or send camera to. Surely not edited right?
The article you referenced also mentioned that media outlets can spend more time with voters etc., when not out travelling with the leaders, however - from previous elections - most of the opinions/comments from voters via national media came directly from the campaign trail. Being able to talk to voters who are at the events directly.
I'm sure the Cons are likely thinking that it will be mostly local media personalities that are provided to their more remote locations with only 2-3 days notice, for example, the Yukon. Not reporters who cover politics full-time from National outlets - which will certainly lead to a watering down of the actual quality of the news I receive.
Personally, I just feel it doesn't serve your average voter at all, the entire purpose of a campaign is to show voters (not tell them) what your party is about. They are already saying it will be one of the most "transparent" campaigns ever run. By restricting access. The hypocrisy on that.