Topper wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2024 2:08 pm
Aaronp18 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2024 11:46 am
Topper wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 8:40 pm
show me the hot streaks.
Beginning of the year he looked good, the stretch from Oct 27-Nov 11 in 8 games he had 15 points.
Guess if we're looking at point production it's not really even the hot streaks but he was fairly consistent until the end of January.
If I mathed correctly he had 63 points in the 49 games before February, if he maintained that 1.2857 PPG pace he'd hit 105 points for the season and likely no argument is made regarding his $11.6m.
If he can continue to get bigger, stronger and faster he very clearly has the hockey IQ so we could see the point production increase even more and see him perform better in the playoffs as well.
Not even really arguing for him, if there was a trade to be made for someone with a little more grit and tenacity with a little less scoring touch I'd be interested in knowing full details and could see it as an improvement. But big trades aren't the easiest to make in the cap world and he is the asset we have, may as well hope for the best at this point.
Yes the entire team was hit in that stretch. Give goals was becoming the norm for the Canucks. There were the blowouts of Edmonton (Oct X2) and San Jose (Nov), his hat trick against a then dismal Nashville team.
For me, great players dominate with multipoint games. That is what separates them from the good players. How did scooter do for multipoint games?
Oct - 6
Nov - 2
Dec - 5
Jan - 6
Feb - 2
Mar - 3
Apr - 0
Topper, I agree with that take on great players dominating. However, I will qualify that by saying that great players also contribute a single point in the majority of the games that are not multi-point outings.
To that end, that record of multi-point games seems reasonable for a great player (not McDavid/Lemieux great mind you) in October, December, and January.
October - 6/9.
December - 5/12
January - 6/13
Pettersson had 32 games this season where he did not register a single point.
10 of those games came AFTER the extension. He produced 0 points in 50% of the games he played after getting his pay day.
The Canucks gave this guy $11.6M x 8 years when he was already showing signs of inconsistent play, being held off the score sheet, in 20 out of 62 games. Would anyone here make one of their employees, or like to see one of their coworkers become, the highest paid worker in company history when he (or she) is a no show 35% of the time?