Canucks Young Guns

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderators: donlever, Referees

User avatar
Tciso
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1776
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:44 am

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by Tciso »

5thhorseman wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 5:58 pm
Tciso wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 10:38 am
5thhorseman wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 9:21 am
"If you asked 5 years ago if I would have considered this, no.
Seems one could say that about almost any deal at any time. Salaries are always going up and 5 years is a long time.
I interpreted him meaning 5 years ago, he would never give an 8 year contract to a kid with under a full season of games, and a year left in his ECL.

But, 3 offer sheets later (Holloway and Broberg and Carlson), GMs are trading offer sheet risk and breakout season risk against early signing of a kid which stagnates and underperforms risk.
Hughes 129 games vs Zeev's 80 games. Both a year left on their ELC. Not a lot of difference but I get your point, offer sheets have certainly raised the stakes and credit to RJ for recognising that. I'm hoping the low profile and expectations will lead to under-the-radar success.
Hughes skated out of mommy's womb worth 9.6% of the cap. Buium will likely be over paid for a year or 2 at 8.3%. And yeah. Offer sheets have pushed top 10 players from 12% to 18% or the cap. But, if the cap keeps rising, these deals drop to 12% when they expire. I agree on the low profile thing. We will need a few good bridge deals for later bloomers like Podkolzin where they over perform the show me contract.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 8717
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by Topper »

donlever wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 4:46 pm Choices are choices....

Other Management teams had choices and picked the wrong ones....like signing EP, Lankinen, Boeser, Louis Eriksson or drafting Juloevi or Virtanen as but a few samples.

These fucking guys had a draft plan and succeeded by all reports and made the right choice with Buium irrespective of our thoughts as to how "easy" that was....

Those are positive, albeit baby steps.....

Hey, I wanted Evan Gold to get hired and in no way, shape or form do I have huge faith in TNFG's by any means.

But the right steps are the right steps.
Hind sight is 20/20
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
User avatar
donlever
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 7217
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:07 pm

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by donlever »

Sure, fair enough, but looking at it from a lever perspective "if I were GM" and those were my choices I would have acted proactively on exactly zero of them.

So no hindsight from me.

Just reality.
DeLevering since 1999.
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 8717
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by Topper »

no point picking scabs on these old debates
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
Post Reply