If the ‘plan’ mentioned above is not realistic or feasible then the Canucks should not be wasting an asset to obtain him. Now, if the Canadiens throw in a sweetener…….UWSaint wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 1:35 pmA washed up Brendan Gallagher is not the profile of an in demand for a courtesy pick asset at the trade deadline. He was worse than Evander Kane last year, and Kane plays a physical style (beat, not just bravely take beatings) that's more attractive at the deadline. Maybe that was Kane, maybe that was PA and JR.theman wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 1:24 pmI would want the Canucks to send a 6/7 rounder only. The goal would be to trade him at TDL for a 4/5 rounder.Mëds wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 1:15 pmDepends why he fell out of the lineup.Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 12:49 pm With Gallagher all but confirming he wants to be traded for his last year and won’t be back in Montreal and is really open to coming to Vancouver, would you trade a 4th or 5th to get him for the year? Would he be one of those vets who could help our young team and help rebuild the culture.
AROUND THE LEAGUE - 25-26
Moderators: donlever, Referees
Re: AROUND THE LEAGUE - 25-26
Re: AROUND THE LEAGUE - 25-26
EP40 for Gallagher. Love it.UWSaint wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 1:31 pm Gallagher can come with a sweetener, not for an asset (even one as low as a 5th).
He's only a liability to Montreal. 7 goals, 16 assists, healthy scratch throughout the playoffs. Make them pay to offload it.
The Montreal cap situation isn't bad…
They might even have an interest in EP40....
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3695
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: AROUND THE LEAGUE - 25-26
So Gallagher and a 2nd for our 5th or 6th?
The only HW the Canucks need
- Picker of Cherries
- CC 1st Team All-Star
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2023 1:11 pm
Re: AROUND THE LEAGUE - 25-26
The Canucks won’t have a taker for Gallagher at the TDL if he couldn’t crack the Canadiens lineup for most of the playoff run, so he is a pure cap dump. I’d want a first to take him. There is better use for 6.5m next season for veteran players that could resurrect themselves that the Canucks can move out at the TDL.
“Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room.”
- President Merkin Muffley
- President Merkin Muffley
Re: AROUND THE LEAGUE - 25-26
Only if they take Scooter too.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
Re: AROUND THE LEAGUE - 25-26
Gallagher with Pickford thank you very much.
Re: AROUND THE LEAGUE - 25-26
$6.5M for a swan song farewell tour
LOL
LOL
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3695
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: AROUND THE LEAGUE - 25-26
As UW pointed out the Habs are not desperate to shed his cap. Sure it would be nice for them but they don’t have to sell off major assets to move him. He only has one year left.
If we are rebuilding why wouldn’t you weaponize our cap space and grab another 2nd for 2027? Now of course it would be outstanding to grab a 1st but again, Habs are not desperate. Agreed Gallagher would unlikely resurrect his play enough to be moveable at the TDD so it would be a Kane scenario in all likelihood. But isn’t a 2nd worth it for a rebuilding club? How about higher return with no retention, lower return for some retention?
Some team somewhere will make a deal like that so why not us? I get if there are other targets you could go for that may provide more for the Canucks and have potential to be moved at TDD. So who are they? I mean I get we will only have so much cap available to weaponize. And who knows, maybe we free up more.
If we are rebuilding why wouldn’t you weaponize our cap space and grab another 2nd for 2027? Now of course it would be outstanding to grab a 1st but again, Habs are not desperate. Agreed Gallagher would unlikely resurrect his play enough to be moveable at the TDD so it would be a Kane scenario in all likelihood. But isn’t a 2nd worth it for a rebuilding club? How about higher return with no retention, lower return for some retention?
Some team somewhere will make a deal like that so why not us? I get if there are other targets you could go for that may provide more for the Canucks and have potential to be moved at TDD. So who are they? I mean I get we will only have so much cap available to weaponize. And who knows, maybe we free up more.
The only HW the Canucks need
Re: AROUND THE LEAGUE - 25-26
I don't think anyone's talking about a swan song farewell tour; I'm certainly not. I'm going to post a response in SKYO's thread.
Hono_rary Canadian
- Lancer
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1887
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:41 am
- Location: Kingston, Ontario
Re: AROUND THE LEAGUE - 25-26
I can see Montreal doing Gallagher a solid - he's been a good soldier for them and there's nothing to be gained by treating him like livestock bound for the glue factory. As long as the price isn't egregious - maybe a 2nd or a 3rd does it - I can see Hughes and RJ talking a deal.Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Tue Jun 02, 2026 8:33 am As UW pointed out the Habs are not desperate to shed his cap. Sure it would be nice for them but they don’t have to sell off major assets to move him. He only has one year left.
If we are rebuilding why wouldn’t you weaponize our cap space and grab another 2nd for 2027? Now of course it would be outstanding to grab a 1st but again, Habs are not desperate. Agreed Gallagher would unlikely resurrect his play enough to be moveable at the TDD so it would be a Kane scenario in all likelihood. But isn’t a 2nd worth it for a rebuilding club? How about higher return with no retention, lower return for some retention?
Some team somewhere will make a deal like that so why not us? I get if there are other targets you could go for that may provide more for the Canucks and have potential to be moved at TDD. So who are they? I mean I get we will only have so much cap available to weaponize. And who knows, maybe we free up more.
Love the Sport. Love the Team.
Hate the League.
Hate the League.

