Signing the kid to an 8-year deal after his rookie year is quite the leap of faith for the club. He could top-out as a Werenski-calibre defenseman - or he could top out as a poor-man’s Tyson Barrie. Then again, with cap inflation adjusted, $9 million isn’t the worst cap hit for a Tyson Barrie-calibre defenseman.
I can see Buium signing despite the comparisons between him and Quit. I don’t think he has Quit’s ego, and he may not want to put himself in a position where he may be leaving the team just as it starts getting better. Pettersson’s apathy has yet to affect him yet.
If he actually wants to sign here long-term and the cap hit is reasonable, why not? Somebody’s gotta fill a spot, and the kid has some promise that he can be more than a 3rd-pairing D.
Canucks News N Notes 25-26
Moderators: donlever, Referees
- Lancer
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:41 am
- Location: Kingston, Ontario
Re: Canucks News N Notes 25-26
Love the Sport. Love the Team.
Hate the League.
Hate the League.
- Picker of Cherries
- CC 1st Team All-Star
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2023 1:11 pm
Re: Canucks News N Notes 25-26
If Buium at 32 games 8 points gets 9 million, what are they paying Willander after next season when he already has 18 points in 57 games, 12 million?
“Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room.”
- President Merkin Muffley
- President Merkin Muffley
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: Canucks News N Notes 25-26
Obviously if we can lock them both up long term the better for us. But as Topper says why would the kids want to give away those FA years when the cap will be so high? Smart money is a Luke Hughes type of deal, 8 years at 9 million. But I can see Buium wanting a shorter 3-5 year deal at 8-9 million, then hitting the big time after that. Same with Willander although when he is eligible to re-sign the max he can get is a 7 year term. And you bet his agent will pay close attention to what Buium gets.
I would gladly lock them both up at max term for 9 million. That gives us long term stability on D.
Two comparable perhaps: Luke Hughes got nine million per year. Jackson LaCombe got nine million per year. Both guys under 25. The big difference is age. Willander and Buium are several years younger so maybe a bridge deal is the way to go but they are only going to get more expensive. Still think Topper has it right, why would their agents recommend a 7-8 year deal now? We would be so lucky.
I would gladly lock them both up at max term for 9 million. That gives us long term stability on D.
Two comparable perhaps: Luke Hughes got nine million per year. Jackson LaCombe got nine million per year. Both guys under 25. The big difference is age. Willander and Buium are several years younger so maybe a bridge deal is the way to go but they are only going to get more expensive. Still think Topper has it right, why would their agents recommend a 7-8 year deal now? We would be so lucky.
The only HW the Canucks need
Re: Canucks News N Notes 25-26
With the way management has butchered things the past couple of years, and the complete lack of a plan, I can't see any young talented players signing here long-term when they could bridge their way to UFA and possibly exit stage left if things continue the way they are.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..

