LOL

[Strangelove]

[Strangelove]

Nope, I'm Edge Lord.

C'mon now, what's your HF handle?

[Cousin Strawberry]

[Blob Mckenzie]

Nope, I'm Edge Lord.
If you're trying to pigeonhole me into some role of being anti-Benning or something to discredit my opinion, I actually supported Benning and Co. for their first 3 seasons or so. My opinion changed on him as the situation unfolded, adapting to the evidence. I think it's hilarious that some people are so entrenched in their views that they refuse to ever change their stance despite seeing the red flags along the way. Simple minded people are too stubborn to ever reconsider their positions.

Ha... most, like 90 % of this administration’s mistakes happened in the first three years. Yet now you gave a problem with Hughes, Pettersson, JT Miller etc..,

You’re a crafty one youse is. Moron

I think you missed the point of the post and honed in on a fringe point. You can try that again if you want.

Why would I try again? You are the cat who said he supported management for the first three years.

[Blob Mckenzie]

Nope, I'm Edge Lord.
If you're trying to pigeonhole me into some role of being anti-Benning or something to discredit my opinion, I actually supported Benning and Co. for their first 3 seasons or so. My opinion changed on him as the situation unfolded, adapting to the evidence. I think it's hilarious that some people are so entrenched in their views that they refuse to ever change their stance despite seeing the red flags along the way. Simple minded people are too stubborn to ever reconsider their positions.

Ha... most, like 90 % of this administration’s mistakes happened in the first three years. Yet now you gave a problem with Hughes, Pettersson, JT Miller etc..,

You’re a crafty one youse is. Moron

I think you missed the point of the post and honed in on a fringe point. You can try that again if you want.

Why would I try again? You are the cat who said he supported management for the first three years.

Yes, because it was about giving Benning the benefit of the doubt and keeping an open mind. Some of the moves definitely required hindsight to see as bad (Vey and Baer trades for sure). I think the Gudbranson trade was the turning point for me.

But the fact that the team now has an elite 19 year old #1 D man and an elite 20 year old #1 centre to build around is a problem? These were both acquired outside of the first three years of debauchery. I was the biggest Benning beater here..... among others. The guy was mostly a disaster on the job outside of the 2014 and 2015 drafts. He mangled the cap and made some really dumb trades. But as a Canucks fan I see a young team albeit riddled with holes on D , that is fun to watch and has promise.

I just laugh at the need of the neckbeards to credit the good picks to certain individuals, and the whole agenda to basically blame Jim Benning for every thing bad, but to not give him a shred of credit for anything that goes right. It’s hilarious really. Be a fan of the sweater... not the administration. If he can’t improve the team from its current state, he’ll get gassed. He has a 1 - 2 year window.

[Strangelove]

Edge, you're not ashamed of your HF persona are ya?

[Chef Boi RD]

Lord of the Edges of Bleached Anals can’t seem to not talk about Benning. Hmmmmmm

Captains Log:
Stardate - 2020.06.04
Time - 18.54
Captain Chef reporting

Edge Lord. An errand boy sent by grocery clerks to collect the bill

[Megaterio Llamas]

Crikey skipper, the ship has run into a gaseous anomaly. Shall we hit 'er with a probe?

[Megaterio Llamas]

The crew appears to be acting strangely in this quadrant?

Captain report to the bridge!

[Chef Boi RD]

Lord of the Edges of Bleached Anals can’t seem to not talk about Benning. Hmmmmmm

Captains Log:
Stardate - 2020.06.04
Time - 18.54
Captain Chef reporting

Edge Lord. An errand boy sent by grocery clerks to collect the bill

Thanks for the shout out!
Imagine writing fan fic on a message board that trashes another message board. That's next level neckbeard stuff

You’re welcome.

Stay tuned

More to come

[Strangelove]

Don't get me wrong, I'm ecstatic to have Pettersson and Hughes. But I don't really view them as a product of GM acumen. Scouting? For sure. Hughes to me was the BPA at where we picked so I don't see it as some steal or something.

I think the only thing that needs to be said on why it makes sense to trash Benning is based on this. If it were up to Benning our team would look something like (to be fair, some of it is based on rumours, but they're based on multiple sources at least):

IN: Bolland, Lucic, Eriksson, Hanifin, Subban, Glass
OUT: Boeser (traded the 2015 pick for Lucic), Hughes (offered the pick for Hanifin), Pettersson, and potentially Horvat if the Subban rumour was true.

People might say "but those things never happened so who cares", but I think the intent of a GM is still important in determining how qualified they are for the job. Benning still wanted to make those moves which is absurd.

Awesome.

[Blob Mckenzie]

If ifs and buts were candy and nuts ......

[Strangelove]

I guess Pat Quinn gets credit for adding Gretzky... twice!

(1988 and 1996)

So let's see, that's 2 Gretzkies for Quinn... he wins!!!

[Strangelove]

If ifs and buts were candy and nuts ......

So I guess our judicial system should acquit anyone charged with attempted murder. Since intent doesn't matter, right?

Maybe it's Mëds socking it to us, trying to make HFers look like total fucking loony toons again...

[Blob Mckenzie]

If ifs and buts were candy and nuts ......

So I guess our judicial system should acquit anyone charged with attempted murder. Since intent doesn't matter, right?

Lol WTF??