A interesting take on the Canucks from Drance:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxOBSGr3noM
Canucks News N Notes 26-27
Moderators: donlever, Referees
Re: Canucks News N Notes 26-27
It's all about the lowered expectations
Re: Canucks News N Notes 26-27
Lol...cue Burton Cummings...
...at least it's not Tommy James.
...at least it's not Tommy James.
DeLevering since 1999.
Re: Canucks News N Notes 26-27
Lot of truth in that graphic!
Though watching a bit of the Hlinka/Gretz Cup the Canucks may have picked a good time to rebuild.
If out of some stroke of luck we can snag DuPont next season and we would likely be near the bottom for a 2028 draft Schultz and Pue look like the real deal.
The Pats should be fun to watch for the next couple years.
Though watching a bit of the Hlinka/Gretz Cup the Canucks may have picked a good time to rebuild.
If out of some stroke of luck we can snag DuPont next season and we would likely be near the bottom for a 2028 draft Schultz and Pue look like the real deal.
The Pats should be fun to watch for the next couple years.
-
Ronning's Ghost
- MVP

- Posts: 839
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:25 pm
- Location: New Westminster
Re: Canucks News N Notes 26-27
An interesting point, and another strong argument for why the Canucks should have been deep in re-build mode in 2015.
[There does not seem to be any board rule against gnawing on the bitter remains of past organizational mistakes.]
Re: Canucks News N Notes 26-27
All part of the endless futility of this franchise - it's in our blood.Ronning's Ghost wrote: ↑Sun Aug 09, 2026 12:57 pm An interesting point, and another strong argument for why the Canucks should have been deep in re-build mode in 2015.
[There does not seem to be any board rule against gnawing on the bitter remains of past organizational mistakes.]
The Jet Woo Era is over.
Re: Canucks News N Notes 26-27
If deep rebuild means trading the Sedins and not fumbling Hamhuis, then that could have made a difference. But at the end of the day, it wasn't the ticky tack "retool" moves (Beer Cheese, Granlund, etc.) that made a meaningful difference. (Even turning Bonino into Sutter instead of true futures wasn't that big of a deal though turned out as bad as it could). It was whiffing on 3 of 5 top 10 picks in 6 years and losing the McCann trade. And even then, the Canucks might have rebuilt into a steady consistent team had their "good" players not have brought a bad (or at least not good) ethic to the table and had they not shot themselves in the foot on a guy like Tanev.Ronning's Ghost wrote: ↑Sun Aug 09, 2026 12:57 pmAn interesting point, and another strong argument for why the Canucks should have been deep in re-build mode in 2015.
[There does not seem to be any board rule against gnawing on the bitter remains of past organizational mistakes.]
Hono_rary Canadian
- Megaterio Llamas
- MVP

- Posts: 8563
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am

