2025 Canucks Off-season

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
2Fingers
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2121
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:47 am

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by 2Fingers »

Chef Boi RD wrote: Fri Jun 27, 2025 6:46 am We really don’t know how this draft class or any draft class turns out until a few years later. The 2017 class was supposed to be a shitty class but a lot of gems came out of that one. The 2016 class was supposed to a great class but a lot of busts and clunkers came out of that one. There will always be Wyatt Johnston’s to find in the 20’s, Jason Robertson’s in the 2nd round, Seth Jarvis’ in the teens and busts like Lafrenierre going 1st overall. It is what it is. We drafted Kesler and Ohlund in the latter parts of the 1st round we can do it again.
Well said RD, all this angst on 17/18 year olds when you have no idea on how they will develop. Usually anyone out of top 5 are hit and miss not matter what draft class they are in, true some years are better than others.
User avatar
Todd Bersnoozi
CC 1st Team All-Star
Posts: 551
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:14 pm

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Todd Bersnoozi »

Madcombinepilot wrote: Fri Jun 27, 2025 7:51 am Yeah. Because Brock is a puck retrieving forechecked who gives 110 % every shift.
Brock is the better scorer though and those guys are generally hard to find. Brock is a potential 40G guy and Garly kinda tops out @ 20G. All I know is when we had Millzy, Brock was always out there on the 1st unit PP. Garly was mostly 2nd unit PP and only played PP1 if one of the top guys were out. I think we also have some smaller play driving forwards in the system like Hoggy, Lekkerimaki and Bains (albeit not as good as Garly right now). In time, hopefully it maybe a different story.
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3933
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Meds »

Boeser is a one-time 40G scorer. He did nor repeat that this season, and he won't ever be a 40G winger again unless he ends up on a line with someone who allows him to capitalize. I've always been a fan of Brock, but I temper my opinion of him with a healthy dose of reality. I think the team that gives him $8.5M is going to be looking to move that contract 3 years from now.

Garland drives his line, he provides the energy, and often the puck possession.

While Garland has never had top line potential, which Brock did have, he is probably a 25G/60Pt winger with consistent linemates not named Blueger and Joshua.

I think $6M x 6 is acceptable for him in a world where the cap is probably going to be $100M a couple of years from now.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 3044
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Hockey Widow »

Ya 6x6 for Garland is better than I thought. That means we will have him for 7 more years, depending upon what type of trade protection eh has. It also shows his commitment to being here. While the same could be said of Boeser and his commitment to being here the same cannot be said for him playing through whatever mental issues he has had, with all due respect to Boeser. I like Boeser and will be sad to see him go but I have said all along I don't want to be the team paying him 8 plus on a 6 plus term. My understanding is that they offered close to 8, if not 8, but for 5 years. I hope he gets what he is looking for. I really do, just not here.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15883
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Strangelove »

"Sea of Garlands"
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Tciso
MVP
MVP
Posts: 995
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:44 am

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Tciso »

Strangelove wrote: Sat Jun 28, 2025 4:35 pm "Sea of Garlands"
Call me Snow White.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9137
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

Strangelove wrote: Sat Jun 28, 2025 4:35 pm "Sea of Garlands"
Did you have an issue with a sea of Sutters, a grubby Air Thief, a ditch of Beagles,a mud puddle of "Guds's" ?


I would have been happier with 5 years. Sign Demmer up and lock down the Capo next summer. They're keeping his peeps.

What do we about the 2 C position?

Horvat for Hronek......... wouldja? 🤓
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
5thhorseman
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1990
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:04 am

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by 5thhorseman »

Definitivamente!
User avatar
Dangling one
AHL Prospect
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2023 4:43 pm

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Dangling one »

Bring Bo Home

#WhatchathinkCheffy
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10369
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Dangling one wrote: Sat Jun 28, 2025 10:04 pm Bring Bo Home

#WhatchathinkCheffy
The BO2Max comes with the pros n cons
User avatar
Cousin Strawberry
MVP
MVP
Posts: 8098
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Cousin Strawberry »

Chef Boi RD wrote: Sun Jun 29, 2025 7:31 am
Dangling one wrote: Sat Jun 28, 2025 10:04 pm Bring Bo Home

#WhatchathinkCheffy
The BO2Max comes with the pros n cons
So Barzal over B02Max?

Will the raisin and Smithers send Willander and the '26 1st for MB?

How enraged would we all be?

(I personally won't give a flying fuck...I need a cup b4 I drop dead)
If you need air...call it in
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10369
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Are we taking a gamble giving Petey one more chance? I ask this because, if we see no change, the other teams see no change, we are stuck with the asshat and his $11.6. They are rolling the dice here if they are keeping him.
User avatar
Picker of Cherries
CC 2nd Team All-Star
Posts: 480
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2023 1:11 pm

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Picker of Cherries »

Chef Boi RD wrote: Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:31 am Are we taking a gamble giving Petey one more chance? I ask this because, if we see no change, the other teams see no change, we are stuck with the asshat and his $11.6. They are rolling the dice here if they are keeping him.
Of course they are sticking with Petey. If they didn’t, it would be a full rebuild and Hughes is probably gone.
Rutherford ain’t here for no stinking rebuild.
I’m more concerned they’l keep Lankinen past July first and lose Silovs (when Demko signs).
“Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room.”
- President Merkin Muffley
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10369
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Picker of Cherries wrote: Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:48 am
Chef Boi RD wrote: Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:31 am Are we taking a gamble giving Petey one more chance? I ask this because, if we see no change, the other teams see no change, we are stuck with the asshat and his $11.6. They are rolling the dice here if they are keeping him.
Of course they are sticking with Petey. If they didn’t, it would be a full rebuild and Hughes is probably gone.
Rutherford ain’t here for no stinking rebuild.
I’m more concerned they’l keep Lankinen past July first and lose Silovs (when Demko signs).
You can do a hockey trade with Petey like Petey for Barzal along those lines. Who says it has to be a trade for futures? All I’m thinking about is that contract, if he continues busting in the coming season, we are pretty much stuck with it. Or, dare I say, buy it out, a la OEL.
User avatar
Lancer
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1170
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Kingston, Ontario

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Lancer »

Chef Boi RD wrote: Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:54 am
Picker of Cherries wrote: Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:48 am
Chef Boi RD wrote: Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:31 am Are we taking a gamble giving Petey one more chance? I ask this because, if we see no change, the other teams see no change, we are stuck with the asshat and his $11.6. They are rolling the dice here if they are keeping him.
Of course they are sticking with Petey. If they didn’t, it would be a full rebuild and Hughes is probably gone.
Rutherford ain’t here for no stinking rebuild.
I’m more concerned they’l keep Lankinen past July first and lose Silovs (when Demko signs).
You can do a hockey trade with Petey like Petey for Barzal along those lines. Who says it has to be a trade for futures? All I’m thinking about is that contract, if he continues busting in the coming season, we are pretty much stuck with it. Or, dare I say, buy it out, a la OEL.
Never say never, but every indication I've seen tells me management is going to stick with Petey. Apparently they've kept tabs on his offseason progress and aren't disappointed so far. We'll see how things sit by tomorrow night.
Love the Sport. Love the Team.

Hate the League.
Post Reply