Well said RD, all this angst on 17/18 year olds when you have no idea on how they will develop. Usually anyone out of top 5 are hit and miss not matter what draft class they are in, true some years are better than others.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Fri Jun 27, 2025 6:46 am We really don’t know how this draft class or any draft class turns out until a few years later. The 2017 class was supposed to be a shitty class but a lot of gems came out of that one. The 2016 class was supposed to a great class but a lot of busts and clunkers came out of that one. There will always be Wyatt Johnston’s to find in the 20’s, Jason Robertson’s in the 2nd round, Seth Jarvis’ in the teens and busts like Lafrenierre going 1st overall. It is what it is. We drafted Kesler and Ohlund in the latter parts of the 1st round we can do it again.
2025 Canucks Off-season
Moderator: Referees
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
- Todd Bersnoozi
- CC 1st Team All-Star
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:14 pm
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
Brock is the better scorer though and those guys are generally hard to find. Brock is a potential 40G guy and Garly kinda tops out @ 20G. All I know is when we had Millzy, Brock was always out there on the 1st unit PP. Garly was mostly 2nd unit PP and only played PP1 if one of the top guys were out. I think we also have some smaller play driving forwards in the system like Hoggy, Lekkerimaki and Bains (albeit not as good as Garly right now). In time, hopefully it maybe a different story.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Fri Jun 27, 2025 7:51 am Yeah. Because Brock is a puck retrieving forechecked who gives 110 % every shift.
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
Boeser is a one-time 40G scorer. He did nor repeat that this season, and he won't ever be a 40G winger again unless he ends up on a line with someone who allows him to capitalize. I've always been a fan of Brock, but I temper my opinion of him with a healthy dose of reality. I think the team that gives him $8.5M is going to be looking to move that contract 3 years from now.
Garland drives his line, he provides the energy, and often the puck possession.
While Garland has never had top line potential, which Brock did have, he is probably a 25G/60Pt winger with consistent linemates not named Blueger and Joshua.
I think $6M x 6 is acceptable for him in a world where the cap is probably going to be $100M a couple of years from now.
Garland drives his line, he provides the energy, and often the puck possession.
While Garland has never had top line potential, which Brock did have, he is probably a 25G/60Pt winger with consistent linemates not named Blueger and Joshua.
I think $6M x 6 is acceptable for him in a world where the cap is probably going to be $100M a couple of years from now.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3044
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
Ya 6x6 for Garland is better than I thought. That means we will have him for 7 more years, depending upon what type of trade protection eh has. It also shows his commitment to being here. While the same could be said of Boeser and his commitment to being here the same cannot be said for him playing through whatever mental issues he has had, with all due respect to Boeser. I like Boeser and will be sad to see him go but I have said all along I don't want to be the team paying him 8 plus on a 6 plus term. My understanding is that they offered close to 8, if not 8, but for 5 years. I hope he gets what he is looking for. I really do, just not here.
The only HW the Canucks need
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 15883
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Someday
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 9137
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
Did you have an issue with a sea of Sutters, a grubby Air Thief, a ditch of Beagles,a mud puddle of "Guds's" ?
I would have been happier with 5 years. Sign Demmer up and lock down the Capo next summer. They're keeping his peeps.
What do we about the 2 C position?
Horvat for Hronek......... wouldja?
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- 5thhorseman
- MVP
- Posts: 1990
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:04 am
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
Definitivamente!
- Dangling one
- AHL Prospect
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2023 4:43 pm
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
Bring Bo Home
#WhatchathinkCheffy
#WhatchathinkCheffy
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP
- Posts: 10369
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
The BO2Max comes with the pros n cons
- Cousin Strawberry
- MVP
- Posts: 8098
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
So Barzal over B02Max?
Will the raisin and Smithers send Willander and the '26 1st for MB?
How enraged would we all be?
(I personally won't give a flying fuck...I need a cup b4 I drop dead)
If you need air...call it in
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP
- Posts: 10369
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
Are we taking a gamble giving Petey one more chance? I ask this because, if we see no change, the other teams see no change, we are stuck with the asshat and his $11.6. They are rolling the dice here if they are keeping him.
- Picker of Cherries
- CC 2nd Team All-Star
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2023 1:11 pm
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
Of course they are sticking with Petey. If they didn’t, it would be a full rebuild and Hughes is probably gone.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:31 am Are we taking a gamble giving Petey one more chance? I ask this because, if we see no change, the other teams see no change, we are stuck with the asshat and his $11.6. They are rolling the dice here if they are keeping him.
Rutherford ain’t here for no stinking rebuild.
I’m more concerned they’l keep Lankinen past July first and lose Silovs (when Demko signs).
“Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room.”
- President Merkin Muffley
- President Merkin Muffley
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP
- Posts: 10369
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
You can do a hockey trade with Petey like Petey for Barzal along those lines. Who says it has to be a trade for futures? All I’m thinking about is that contract, if he continues busting in the coming season, we are pretty much stuck with it. Or, dare I say, buy it out, a la OEL.Picker of Cherries wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:48 amOf course they are sticking with Petey. If they didn’t, it would be a full rebuild and Hughes is probably gone.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:31 am Are we taking a gamble giving Petey one more chance? I ask this because, if we see no change, the other teams see no change, we are stuck with the asshat and his $11.6. They are rolling the dice here if they are keeping him.
Rutherford ain’t here for no stinking rebuild.
I’m more concerned they’l keep Lankinen past July first and lose Silovs (when Demko signs).
- Lancer
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:41 am
- Location: Kingston, Ontario
Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season
Never say never, but every indication I've seen tells me management is going to stick with Petey. Apparently they've kept tabs on his offseason progress and aren't disappointed so far. We'll see how things sit by tomorrow night.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:54 amYou can do a hockey trade with Petey like Petey for Barzal along those lines. Who says it has to be a trade for futures? All I’m thinking about is that contract, if he continues busting in the coming season, we are pretty much stuck with it. Or, dare I say, buy it out, a la OEL.Picker of Cherries wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:48 amOf course they are sticking with Petey. If they didn’t, it would be a full rebuild and Hughes is probably gone.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:31 am Are we taking a gamble giving Petey one more chance? I ask this because, if we see no change, the other teams see no change, we are stuck with the asshat and his $11.6. They are rolling the dice here if they are keeping him.
Rutherford ain’t here for no stinking rebuild.
I’m more concerned they’l keep Lankinen past July first and lose Silovs (when Demko signs).
Love the Sport. Love the Team.
Hate the League.
Hate the League.