Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Cousin Strawberry · Post by **Cousin Strawberry** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:55 pm

Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:42 pm Jake Virtanen and Adam Gaudette for Brandon Carlo

Not enough.....they can throw in Jake Debrusk and a 2nd

Blob Mckenzie · Post by **Blob Mckenzie** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:23 pm

The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:55 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:42 pm Jake Virtanen and Adam Gaudette for Brandon Carlo
Not enough.....they can throw in Jake Debrusk and a 2nd

Not enough for who?

Cousin Strawberry · Post by **Cousin Strawberry** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:25 pm

Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:23 pm
The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:55 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:42 pm Jake Virtanen and Adam Gaudette for Brandon Carlo
Not enough.....they can throw in Jake Debrusk and a 2nd
Not enough for who?

Just for that....Carlo, Debrusk and a 1st!

Blob Mckenzie · Post by **Blob Mckenzie** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:31 pm

You eating Gomer’s crayons?

SKYO · Post by **SKYO** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:50 pm

Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:42 pm Jake Virtanen and Adam Gaudette for Brandon Carlo

Yup those two could be our la kings "simmonds + schenn" for one effective player.

theman · Post by **theman** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:10 pm

On twitter, someone has tweeted that Satiar Shah said on 650 that Canucks are close to re-signing Taffoli. No info is given as to the contract and this is not on his official twitter page either. So, take this for all that it's worth. Apparently Shah said that the deal should be done by the end of this week.

Cousin Strawberry · Post by **Cousin Strawberry** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:22 pm

Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:31 pm You eating Gomer’s crayons?

It was sarcasm Doyler. No way you get Carlo for depth pieces

Blob Mckenzie · Post by **Blob Mckenzie** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:35 pm

The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:22 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:31 pm You eating Gomer’s crayons?
It was sarcasm Doyler. No way you get Carlo for depth pieces

Boston needs offence. They have a lot of depth on D. He’s a second pairing guy there behind Charlie on the right side. I think Gaudette and Virtanen are both capable of scoring 20. That said, if they put Carlo on the market they would probably garner better offers. I wouldn’t trade Boeser for Carlo, that’s for sure. That’s a hefty overpay.

Cousin Strawberry · Post by **Cousin Strawberry** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:30 pm

Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:35 pm
The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:22 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:31 pm You eating Gomer’s crayons?
It was sarcasm Doyler. No way you get Carlo for depth pieces
Boston needs offence. They have a lot of depth on D. He’s a second pairing guy there behind Charlie on the right side. I think Gaudette and Virtanen are both capable of scoring 20. That said, if they put Carlo on the market they would probably garner better offers. I wouldn’t trade Boeser for Carlo, that’s for sure. That’s a hefty overpay.

Hey I'm smokin what yer rollin but Jake and the skinny man dont feel like near enough unless the booins are looking to shed his contract for whatever reason and/or see something I dont in either of those 2 canuck players

Cousin Strawberry · Post by **Cousin Strawberry** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:34 pm

I cant see BB on the move this summer either. If he hasn't rediscovered his wrister next summer however...

He would be shopped

Blob Mckenzie · Post by **Blob Mckenzie** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:42 pm

Boeser and Stecher for Carlo and Debrusk? Virtanen and Ratbones for Carlo? Gaudette for Lauzon?

Madcombinepilot · Post by **Madcombinepilot** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:50 pm

Not that I want to engage in the ‘pipe dreams’ part, but if we are moving Gaudette and Jake, it’s because they are part of the deals that move any 3 of the 4 others out. They ain’t going to the Booins

Meds · Post by **Meds** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:01 pm

Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:50 pm Not that I want to engage in the ‘pipe dreams’ part, but if we are moving Gaudette and Jake, it’s because they are part of the deals that move any 3 of the 4 others out. They ain’t going to the Booins

Bingo.

And Gaudette failed to impress in the playoffs. 0 points in 10 games. Gotta say we may have over-rated him.

Blob Mckenzie · Post by **Blob Mckenzie** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:22 pm

Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:50 pm Not that I want to engage in the ‘pipe dreams’ part, but if we are moving Gaudette and Jake, it’s because they are part of the deals that move any 3 of the 4 others out. They ain’t going to the Booins

I could definitely see a hockey trade. Vancouver has depth up front and they are young guys that should be fairly cheap and we need a D man in the worst way.

Virtanen is probably going to sign for 2.5 -2.8 so I’m not sure he’d qualify as cheap labour to get out of a shitty contract. Gaudette absolutely though as I can see his deal in that 1.5 million range.m

My ideas were more random thoughts but Boston, Carolina, NYI and NYR all make a bit of sense as trade partners.

Madcombinepilot · Post by **Madcombinepilot** » Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:53 pm

Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:22 pm
Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:50 pm Not that I want to engage in the ‘pipe dreams’ part, but if we are moving Gaudette and Jake, it’s because they are part of the deals that move any 3 of the 4 others out. They ain’t going to the Booins
I could definitely see a hockey trade. Vancouver has depth up front and they are young guys that should be fairly cheap and we need a D man in the worst way.

Virtanen is probably going to sign for 2.5 -2.8 so I’m not sure he’d qualify as cheap labour to get out of a shitty contract. Gaudette absolutely though as I can see his deal in that 1.5 million range.m

My ideas were more random thoughts but Boston, Carolina, NYI and NYR all make a bit of sense as trade partners.

As much as I agree we need a defenceman upgrade, we need to clear out contracts more. Next year (barring a Cinderella run) is not “year 1“ of contention status. We can’t be considered a contender with 25% of our cap space not spent wisely (for those not doing the math, add Erikkssoon, Sutter, Beagle, Luongo, and Baertschi together and tell me if we have to add Ferlund, Roussel and the Spooner buyout to get there without a debate)

We clean that shit up (which happens all by itself in the next 24 months), THEN we can seriously compete. We can probably compete next year If we get 1/2 the shit off the books (Erickson, Baertschi and one of beagle or Sutter).

IMO, cap is the 1st priority. If we have that, we don’t have to sacrifice depth to get better.

CanucksCorner.com Forums

CanucksCorner.com Forums

Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO

Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO