I dunno bro, you've chosen some of the most team-friendly contracts in the league as comparables.
(not counting Nylander of course)
Moderator: Referees
I dunno bro, you've chosen some of the most team-friendly contracts in the league as comparables.
I could see Brock getting less than pastrnak, but only on a short-team deal.Cherry Picker wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:25 pm I said a couple months ago he shouldn’t be more than Pasternak on a six year deal.
I stand by that. If he turned down 7m x 6. He’s asking too much and should sit. That was a rumour, so I don’t put much stock in it. I wouldn’t give 7m unless it was 7 years, and I’d be fine with 8m x 8 as was also rumoured, but that would be my max.
The Canucks need to avoid getting bent over like Dumbass, not only for the cost for Boeser, but the scary thing is the precedent it sets heading into negotiations with Hughes and Pettersson. This cannot be a “sign him at any cost” contract.
You've gotta remember to adjust that Pastrnak contract for inflationCherry Picker wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:25 pm I said a couple months ago he shouldn’t be more than Pasternak on a six year deal.
I stand by that. If he turned down 7m x 6. He’s asking too much and should sit. That was a rumour, so I don’t put much stock in it. I wouldn’t give 7m unless it was 7 years, and I’d be fine with 8m x 8 as was also rumoured, but that would be my max.
The Canucks need to avoid getting bent over like Dumbass, not only for the cost for Boeser, but the scary thing is the precedent it sets heading into negotiations with Hughes and Pettersson. This cannot be a “sign him at any cost” contract.
Only somewhat true because it's his agent doing all the work on his behalf, they probably set a couple numbers and terms up, same with the team, go high, go low yada yada, it's getting close.ESQ wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:45 pmI could see Brock getting less than pastrnak, but only on a short-team deal.Cherry Picker wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:25 pm I said a couple months ago he shouldn’t be more than Pasternak on a six year deal.
I stand by that. If he turned down 7m x 6. He’s asking too much and should sit. That was a rumour, so I don’t put much stock in it. I wouldn’t give 7m unless it was 7 years, and I’d be fine with 8m x 8 as was also rumoured, but that would be my max.
The Canucks need to avoid getting bent over like Dumbass, not only for the cost for Boeser, but the scary thing is the precedent it sets heading into negotiations with Hughes and Pettersson. This cannot be a “sign him at any cost” contract.
It was always going to be a tricky negotiation - terrible injuries over 2 years, seems to have not hit his potential but he's had his wrist taped up for 1.5 years.
I'm still optimistic so I think any long-term deal is buying low - if he signs a bridge, he'll be making a hell of a lot more on his next deal.
But the other issue is Brock's dad's health - I think Stecher mentioned it in the media. It's a pretty legit reason to not be 100% focused on the contract negotiation.
Dhaliwal:
Boeser talks have picked up since last night. Deal not imminent but at least they are talking. Positive sign.
$7M x3, gets more CASH over a lot of his comparables and can see if he's deserving of the mega contract then - health wise.Strangelove wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:52 pmYou've gotta remember to adjust that Pastrnak contract for inflationCherry Picker wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:25 pm I said a couple months ago he shouldn’t be more than Pasternak on a six year deal.
I stand by that. If he turned down 7m x 6. He’s asking too much and should sit. That was a rumour, so I don’t put much stock in it. I wouldn’t give 7m unless it was 7 years, and I’d be fine with 8m x 8 as was also rumoured, but that would be my max.
The Canucks need to avoid getting bent over like Dumbass, not only for the cost for Boeser, but the scary thing is the precedent it sets heading into negotiations with Hughes and Pettersson. This cannot be a “sign him at any cost” contract.
... and remember it's widely considered the league's most team-friendly contract.
https://twitter.com/DhaliwalSports/stat ... 9665545216Rick Dhaliwal
@DhaliwalSports
Boeser and Canucks getting close .
5:42 PM - 16 Sep 2019
https://twitter.com/FriedgeHNIC/status/ ... 5359792129Rick Dhaliwal
@DhaliwalSports
Hearing it’s a bridge deal for Boeser.
5:50 PM - 16 Sep 2019
https://twitter.com/sportsnetmurph/stat ... 6297306113Elliotte Friedman
@FriedgeHNIC
Another RFA stand-off is coming to an end. Could be tonight.
5:52 PM - 16 Sep 2019
Dan Murphy
@sportsnetmurph
It’s going to be a three year deal for Boeser. #canucks
5:54 PM - 16 Sep 2019
Drance:
Gaffar saying it'll be just under $6M AAV, there ya go Hargraves.3-year deal for Brock Boeser would buy out all of his pre-arbitration years.
Deal would expire in the summer of 2022.
As it currently stands, the Canucks are only committed to Horvat, Miller, Ferland and Myers for the 2022-23 season.
Both Lu and Loui are gonzo.Strangelove wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 6:09 pm ^ Just as Luongo's recapture penalty comes off the books too...