Because throwing more guns at a problem is a wise solution? yeah no.Uncle dans leg wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2019 6:25 pmToo bad the muslims didnt have their own gunsSKYO wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:30 pm New Zealand gets one terrorist attack and boom they are changing their gun laws further to be more strict.
49 dead in terror attack at New Zealand mosques
New Zealand's prime minister vows to change country's gun laws
https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/new- ... f89e62155e
In fact it'll make it worse.
Analogy time, it's like a nice bike - leaving it with one lock on it deters a little bit to a thief, but throw 3 different types of locks on it it'll deter a lot more thieves who are looking for easy pickin's, BUT it's never 100% full proof, IF a person reallllly wants it, they'll get it sure but it'll be a helluva lot more safer.Strangelove wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2019 7:47 pmGuys like that will get their guns with or without gun laws.
The only way gun laws might affect a situation like this is to disarm that guy who was shooting back at them.
I mean what has the strictest laws for weapons? nukes aha, if it was easy to get a lot more terrorists would use it to kill their enemies, but it has the strictest craziest laws to keep it out of terrorists hands, so they get whatever they can get and these days it's automatic weapons, and stricter laws will help more than you think, sure it's not 100% full proof, but it'll deter the fringe terrorists from getting them, making killing weapons harder to get is proven to work, whether you like it or not.
The easier you make things to get, the likelier a terrorist will use it.
Now i'm not talking hunting rifles, just your AK-47's - assault rifles etc. Make those assault rifles way harder to get, the less and less likelier a potential terrorist will be able to use it.