Pastrnak is miles better than Nylander. Not even in the same universe.
My gawd $7 million per for Nylander. Ouch. Not sure what contract is worse his contract or the 5’-11” 170 lb version of Mason Raymond - Nicolaj “riding shotgun with Laine” Ehlers, contract?
RoyalDude wrote: ↑Sun Jan 13, 2019 8:18 am
Pastrnak is miles better than Nylander. Not even in the same universe.
My gawd $7 million per for Nylander. Ouch. Not sure what contract is worse his contract or the 5’-11” 170 lb version of Mason Raymond - Nicolaj “riding shotgun with Laine” Ehlers, contract?
And notice the heftier, chubbier face;>>>>>>>>>>
Out of shape and laughing! Good job Kyle, good job...
Uncle dans leg wrote: ↑Sun Jan 13, 2019 8:48 am
Nylander isnt a 3 point player bro...hes just rusty as fuck and drowning in expectations.
Nylander for Gudbranson. Buy low time
Would you pay Nylander more dough than Pastrnak?
I would trade the underwhelming Gudbranson for an underachieving Nylander straight up yes
The thing is Dude...Nylander has performed at an elite level in his career whereas Gudbranson has not. A weak as fuck Maple leaves defense will be overpaying for help on their playoff run this year. Why cant Benning be the jimmy-on-the-spot and cater to their ineptitude while sneaking away witht he better asset? And its isnt even a debate whether Nylander is the better asset...
Uncle dans leg wrote: ↑Sun Jan 13, 2019 8:48 am
Nylander isnt a 3 point player bro...hes just rusty as fuck and drowning in expectations.
Nylander for Gudbranson. Buy low time
Would you pay Nylander more dough than Pastrnak?
I would trade the underwhelming Gudbranson for an underachieving Nylander straight up yes
The thing is Dude...Nylander has performed at an elite level in his career whereas Gudbranson has not. A weak as fuck Maple leaves defense will be overpaying for help on their playoff run this year. Why cant Benning be the jimmy-on-the-spot and cater to their ineptitude while sneaking away witht he better asset? And its isnt even a debate whether Nylander is the better asset...
Dude. W.T.F. Are you going on about regarding Gudbranson and Nylander? Are you happy to becpaying Nylander more than Pastrnak?
Uncle dans leg wrote: ↑Sun Jan 13, 2019 8:48 am
Nylander isnt a 3 point player bro...hes just rusty as fuck and drowning in expectations.
Nylander for Gudbranson. Buy low time
Would you pay Nylander more dough than Pastrnak?
I would trade the underwhelming Gudbranson for an underachieving Nylander straight up yes
The thing is Dude...Nylander has performed at an elite level in his career whereas Gudbranson has not. A weak as fuck Maple leaves defense will be overpaying for help on their playoff run this year. Why cant Benning be the jimmy-on-the-spot and cater to their ineptitude while sneaking away witht he better asset? And its isnt even a debate whether Nylander is the better asset...
Whereas I would love to see a BIG upgrade on Gudbranson, I would be wary that the Nylander contract is not as big as it's holder's ego.
If the asking price would be an expendable asset like EG yes...i would consider his salary to be acceptable. Hes not Loiu Eriksson the 2 goal wonder weener dude. Nylander would round out vancouvers top 6 perfectly and if he was on EPs line could push a point a game