Aaronp18 wrote:Island Nucklehead wrote:
Any way you slice it both the Seguin and Hamilton trades were terrible for Boston.
How were they supposed to keep these guys?
Seguin makes $5.5 now, Dougie $5.75.
Who can they lose from their roster so they can fit their existing contracts under the cap?
Well they showed they were willing to move Lucic (and eat salary). They didn't need to take back Eriksson ($4.25), they might've been better off keeping Seguin instead of Krejci, who signed a $7.25M extension recently and was on a $5+M deal when they extended Seguin. They just signed Belesky to a $3.8M per deal, and they're still paying Kelly $3M and they extended McQuaid for $2.75M. They currently have nearly $4.7M in cap space.
And yeah, I agree with the premise. Good teams have a hard time holding onto all their good players. They don't tend to trade away their best young players for underwhelming returns. Instead of focusing a rebuild around Seguin and Hamilton (not a bad starting point), they're stuck with a bunch of unproven prospects and numerous long-term, big-money contracts to aging players (Krejci $7.25 til 35, Bergeron $6.875 til 37, Chara $6.9 til 41, Seidenberg $4M til 37).
Benning went out of his way to acquire players in that early-20's age group, calling it an organizational gap, something most people praised. The Bruins seem to have created their own.