Page 54 of 61
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2026 12:34 pm
by Topper
Shots may not be blocked but the rebounds are being cleared
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2026 1:46 pm
by Carl Yagro
^Lol.
Bad seed don't grow even in fertile soil?
I just don't understand many of this younger generation that keeps posting on social daily, every little private thing for all the world to see. Making TikToks is more important than nurturing their own basic human needs. Feed the ego instead of the soul.
It may sound cold, but everyone has shit going on. Nobody needs to know every pimple that appears. This whole "influencer" culture is a completely worthless money-grifting exercise.
Get this brand outta here asap. Let's get some hockey players in here instead.
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2026 4:17 pm
by Lancer
Topper wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2026 9:10 am
theman wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2026 9:00 am
Regarding the miscarriages, have a heart.
for the tiktok attention whore?
Look at
ME!
I"M! barren
At least the Dickless Swede isn't wasting a useful womb...
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 11:55 am
by BoS
Not sure if he’s playing with an injury, or deep in the doghouse, but Mason McTavish has been playing 4th line minutes for months. Last night he was healthy scratched as the Ducks evened the series in Vegas.
Is Petey for McT straight up doable?
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 1:24 pm
by Hockey Widow
BoS wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2026 11:55 am
Not sure if he’s playing with an injury, or deep in the doghouse, but Mason McTavish has been playing 4th line minutes for months. Last night he was healthy scratched as the Ducks evened the series in Vegas.
Is Petey for McT straight up doable?
This is being bandied about on the internet today. The caution is trading our perceived problem or mistake for the Ducks perceived problem or mistake. Does it make us better? Or are we trading one problem for another. Certainly the age factor plays into our rebuild. The cap savings, as long as we didn't have to retain, are really an issue for us for the next couple of years unless we are planning on hitting the FA market in July.
I think Pettersson is worth more in the trade market than McTavish today. But if he is in the doghouse his value could get even lower. He needs a fresh start on a different team.
Would you do a straight swap, no retention?
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 3:05 pm
by Lancer
Hells to the fucking yes.
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 3:53 pm
by BoS
100%
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 4:00 pm
by Meds
Without question.
I'd even throw in a 2nd or 3rd round pick to get it done with no retention.
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 8:27 pm
by donlever
I'll be D'artangnan then.
Yes if you don't get it.
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 9:03 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
BoS wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2026 11:55 am
Not sure if he’s playing with an injury, or deep in the doghouse, but Mason McTavish has been playing 4th line minutes for months. Last night he was healthy scratched as the Ducks evened the series in Vegas.
Is Petey for McT straight up doable?
Pat Verbeek isn't torching what he's built with a team wrecker with an anchor contract.
No chance.
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 9:04 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
On the bright side, it's only six more years...
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 9:13 pm
by donlever
Now there is some optimism for ya.
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 10:42 pm
by Meds
donlever wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2026 9:13 pm
Now there is some optimism for ya.
Unusual considering the source.....and subject.
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 11:18 pm
by BoS
What if Matthews goes to LA?
Surely Verbeek must respond
Re: The Petey Predicament
Posted: Sat May 09, 2026 8:40 am
by Cousin Strawberry
So what do we all do if the kid rebounds? We've been stringing him up for 2 years now and itll be a little awkward to throw any praise his way after that...