Page 438 of 438

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 6:44 am
by Chef Boi RD
Jim Benning still speaks from the GM graveyard, our two best assets in Abby are Silovs and Karlsson! Key figures in winning the championship!!

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:00 am
by Lancer
Madcombinepilot wrote: Mon Jun 23, 2025 7:37 pm We either have great depth,
or all we have is depth.

IYKYK…🤷🏼
Been thinking about Abby's championship and what it means to the big club.

What does it mean?

It means we have a coach on the Farm who climbed that head coach learning curve quickly and successfully. If he doesn't get scooped up this summer by another NHL team, it means we have a viable option if Foote trips up this season and needs to be canned.

It means that Silovs has proved himself in the minors, and is a significant asset to management moving forward. Given the organization's stable of goaltending prospects in the pipeline already, Silovs may have seen the last of Abby - whether he becomes a fixture in Vancouver or some other NHL team. In the end, notwithstanding what happens with Demko, Vancouver's goaltending depth is the envy of more than a few clubs, I wager.

It means that the handful of prospects who could become important parts of a contending team got some great professional playoff experience. For kids like Lekk, Mancini, Kuds, and Raty, this is something from which they can draw when they get into the playoffs with the big team. Look what it did for the likes of Kes, Burr and Bieksa. Even so, nobody among them looks destined to become a core part of the team moving forward though it looks good for the upcoming supporting cast.

Mostly, though, it means that Vancouver has quality depth options in the bottom-6. Karlsson, Sasson, PDG, Bains, and Blais will never threaten anyone's job in Vancouver's top-6. Nobody is slotting Cole McWard into the top-4 in Vancouver either. That said, when injuries happen in the top-6 or top-4, the risk will be more related to the Vancouver player who moves up a slot, as opposed to whoever from the Farm comes in to replace them lower in the lineup.

If they won, and it was Lekk leading the team and playoffs in scoring and such, perhaps a different assessment of the prospect system. With Silovs and the veterans leading the way - admittedly with some bright spots from Lekk, Kuds and Mancini - this just means that Vancouver's farm system is solid; it just needs more promising youngsters with higher ceilings to churn out better players for the big club.

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:11 am
by Cousin Strawberry
Chef Boi RD wrote: Tue Jun 24, 2025 6:44 am Jim Benning still speaks from the GM graveyard, our two best assets in Abby are Silovs and Karlsson! Key figures in winning the championship!!
Now that we're this thin on prospects again maybe they should bring ol Jimmy back to lead the scouts for a few years til we restock the cupboards

He does have an eye for talent

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:19 am
by Lancer
Cousin Strawberry wrote: Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:11 am
He does have an eye for talent
Benning, or his departed bird-dog Brackett???

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:28 am
by UWSaint
Lancer wrote: Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:00 am Been thinking about Abby's championship and what it means to the big club.

What does it mean?
Good post.

What I think it means is that the Canucks had a team of AHL veterans, not exciting but undeveloped NHL prospects (in addition to your comments about Silovs and Malhotra).

These guys who are a little past the age where you can project much bigger things (e.g., Karlsson, Sasson) but aren't known-forever tweeners-at-best AHL-contributors-better (e.g., Wolanin, Nielsen) are the kinds of guys that maybe you can get some bottom 6 benefit from for cheap. Maybe they can develop specialized skills in those or on top of those roles -- Karlsson on the PP and annoyance; Sasson to figure out how to use that + speed for forechecking and pestiness not playmaking.

But the Canucks have invested in players for those kinds of spots in the lineup -- Joshua, Hoglander, O'Connor, Lankinen. Its not that those contracts are individually bad (well, I think Lankinen is a terrible deal), Its that their marginal value over what can be provided by this post-prospect pre-guaranteed tweener class is unlikely to be huge, yet the aggregated player costs over near league minimum salaries is not insignificant. Let's see Raty (who is still developing but doesn't have more to get from the AHL), Silovs, Karlsson, and Sasson in Vancouver next year.

Now, because these vet bottom 6 type NHL contracts aren't individually bad (and perhaps others around the league think the Lankinen deal is all right -- looking at you, Buffalo), they are probably movable for some return. Let's see what happens.....

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:58 am
by rikster
UWSaint wrote: Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:28 am
Lancer wrote: Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:00 am Been thinking about Abby's championship and what it means to the big club.

What does it mean?
Good post.

What I think it means is that the Canucks had a team of AHL veterans, not exciting but undeveloped NHL prospects (in addition to your comments about Silovs and Malhotra).

These guys who are a little past the age where you can project much bigger things (e.g., Karlsson, Sasson) but aren't known-forever tweeners-at-best AHL-contributors-better (e.g., Wolanin, Nielsen) are the kinds of guys that maybe you can get some bottom 6 benefit from for cheap. Maybe they can develop specialized skills in those or on top of those roles -- Karlsson on the PP and annoyance; Sasson to figure out how to use that + speed for forechecking and pestiness not playmaking.

But the Canucks have invested in players for those kinds of spots in the lineup -- Joshua, Hoglander, O'Connor, Lankinen. Its not that those contracts are individually bad (well, I think Lankinen is a terrible deal), Its that their marginal value over what can be provided by this post-prospect pre-guaranteed tweener class is unlikely to be huge, yet the aggregated player costs over near league minimum salaries is not insignificant. Let's see Raty (who is still developing but doesn't have more to get from the AHL), Silovs, Karlsson, and Sasson in Vancouver next year.

Now, because these vet bottom 6 type NHL contracts aren't individually bad (and perhaps others around the league think the Lankinen deal is all right -- looking at you, Buffalo), they are probably movable for some return. Let's see what happens.....
Actually the baby Canucks had one of the youngest teams in the league and younger than traditional Calder Cup champion teams...

What does it mean?...that our media and fans need to start paying attention to the system and not just when they are on a deep playoff run...

Thought this post from HF put a nice button on it...
Even as the AHL Canucks were parading around the ice the Bojangles Coliseum, there's a lot of members of this team likely won't be back. That's just the nature of the beast in the AHL, a constant changing of the guard.

Veteran UFA's now include Blais, Khaira, Wolanin, PDG, Smith, Kambeitz and Brisebois. Difficult to see how any of them will be back--maybe Brisebois, but that's about it.

But the mystery is the raft of RFA's on this team. The list is long: Bains, Raty, Sasson, Glover, Nielson, Woo, McWard, Felton and Tolopilo. And Hirose is a Group 6 UFA without enough games to be an RFA.

The other mystery is in goal where they currently have six under contract: Lankinen, Demko, Silovs, Tolopilo, Patera and Koskenuvo. Far too many, even if they were to send somebody to Kalamazoo.

And of course they have to find room for the likes of Arliksson, Bloom, Mynio and the recently signed Ravinskis next season. And I suspect they'll be busy adding a college UFA or two.

But I guess you enjoy tonight, and where the roster all breaks down in a few months is a conversation for another day.
btw, the poster forgot to mention Young in the group of netminders under contract who has a high upside...

Take care...

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:27 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Chef Boi RD wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 6:43 am :look:
Cousin Strawberry wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 2:59 pm I bet Todd Diamond isn't even his real name
I just finished the book Jack “Legs” Diamond, the New York Irish mobster from the early 20’s. It wasn’t his real last name either. Great book, written by Willam Kennedy who wrote Ironweed, later turned into a movie, starring yours truly Jack Nicholson.

What about local big bucks legend - Jack Diamond? Rags to riches. He bought a butcher shop and later created British Columbia's largest meat packing firm, Pacific Meats. In 1963, Diamond sold Pacific Meats and formed West Coast Reduction, a tallow and feed company. I believe West Coast Reduction was where Hargraves neighbor- Pickton the Pig Farmer sent the remaining parts of his DTES gals. The Diamond family still own West Coast Reduction, today, it’s a license to print money. I wonder if Diamond was Jacks real last name. It’s a Jew name, I think, but I may just be thinking that for the Jews monopoly in the racket. I believe the Jews control De Beers which controls a substantial portion of the global rough diamond market and have a history of managing the distribution and pricing of diamonds.

It’s all a racket, the CC is a racket, like Lever’s racket, he’s a racketeer.

Poor ole Legs eventually got 3 bullets in the back of the head in
1931

IMG_7613.jpeg
I knew a Johnny Diamond years ago.

There's an investigation currently regarding how that inmate got a hold of that broken broom handle that he used to bludgeon Pickton with.

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2025 6:06 am
by Chef Boi RD
The Diamonds are ruthless