Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2020 2:30 pm
Well you haven't been right yet Skyo, but keep up the good work. 

https://canuckscorner.com/forums/
Just 9% trust media ‘a great deal,’ 33% 'none at all,' highest ever
The poll highlights:
- 9% in U.S. trust mass media "a great deal" and 31% "a fair amount."
- 27% have "not very much" trust and 33% "none at all."
- The percentage with no trust at all is a record high, up five points since 2019.
Since the 2016 election, Republicans and Democrats have been widely divided on the media. Democrats have supported the media which has been harsh to President Trump while Republicans have abandoned the mass media for that reason...
In its “Bottom Line” analysis, Gallup said, “Americans' confidence in the media to report the news fairly, accurately and fully has been persistently low for over a decade and shows no signs of improving, as Republicans' and Democrats' trust moves in opposite directions. The political polarization that grips the country is reflected in partisans' views of the media, which are now the most divergent in Gallup's history.”
#SCOTUS throws out Texas's suit attempting to challenge presidential election results in four battleground states, granting Texas leave to file its complaint but summarily dismissing its suit for lack of standing:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_p860.pdf
ORIG. TEXAS V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of
complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of
the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially
cognizable interest in the manner in which another State
conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed
as moot.
Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins:
In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a
bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original
jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___
(Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore
grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not
grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.
Mmmmm, looks like NBC was right.5thhorseman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 9:04 pm I'll go with NBC on this one. SCOTUS will probably not even hear the case or, at best, summarily dismiss it.
It would've been her if the old fart could've just hung on for a little while longer.
Planet Northern Europe.
What were the 4 criteria the were surveyed on?
Yet another great post from Mëds... you're on a roll lately buds!Mëds wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 7:39 am What were the 4 criteria the were surveyed on?
And where did they conduct the surveys? I'd wager that they polled the GTA, Quebec, and possibly Vancouver. Sure they are the dense population centers, but they aren't truly reflective of the entire country. You basically just polled the left-loving strongholds.
The majority of people that I have spoken to in my area, and friends in other areas that are not metropolitan, have little use for Canada's major news networks.
Did you ever hear about "Harper's agenda"? CBC, CTV, and Global, all ran with that constantly. They weren't out to find the truth, they weren't out to represent Canada, they were out to help the Liberal party of Canada sow seeds of doubt and distrust in a Prime Minister who probably was the best this Country has seen for a very long time. Maybe not the most personable fellow, but highly intelligent, and his policies stabilized Canada through some very uncertain economic times.
The media is no different than social media.....for some reason they are just trusted to be reliable and objective.
Strangelove wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:02 pm Per comes crawling in here, mewling and puking, regurgitating titty juice.
That entire post by Doc and all Wiz saw was "titty juice".The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:16 pmStrangelove wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:02 pm Per comes crawling in here, mewling and puking, regurgitating titty juice.![]()