Page 351 of 459
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:03 am
by Richardstroker69
Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 6:23 am
Someone needs to take Green aside look him square in the eye and say “no more Schaller”
Travis Lunch-bucket Greener
Travis really gets a hard on for schaller and even beagle (although I’m pretty sure beagle is playing through an injury). Once ferland is back and we trade a bag of pucks for Simmonds I want
Ferland Pete Miller
Tanner bo Brock
Jake gaud Simmonds
Roussel sutter mac/motte/Bailey/Louie
Getting a little more snarl will serve the boys well in the playoffs.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 10:39 am
by Mickey107
It's Schaller's spot that should be taken by "The Enforcer" Doesn't have to be a star but has to be able to keep up, decent size, (not under 6.1),
really good team-mate and some nifty offensive and defensive skills, (meaning he wont hurt you in the plus/minus department), and no less than
30-35 point per years. And, has the rare ability to take off the other teams best players in scuffles and succinctly retaliate (modestly legally) when
our best players are jerked around. Can get right in to a hockey fight when necessary and has no history of concussions or neck problems.
This player should be around 23 to 25 years old with no ultra unique history. Sounds simple enough.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 11:06 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
Hayes and the 'O Dog' with the gospel from Hogtown
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 11:31 pm
by Mickey107
.
Twitter video a bit sticky but....
/Cam Robinson/@Hockey_Robinson
Canucks prospect, Jack Rathbone with 3 points tonight - including the game-tying goal with under 2 minutes to play.
https://twitter.com/Hockey_Robinson/sta ... 41824?s=09
He’s up to 22 points in 21 NCAA games.
Harvard Athletics
8:42 PM · Feb 14, 2020
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:59 am
by Blob Mckenzie
Richardstroker69 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:03 am
Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 6:23 am
Someone needs to take Green aside look him square in the eye and say “no more Schaller”
Travis Lunch-bucket Greener
Travis really gets a hard on for schaller and even beagle (although I’m pretty sure beagle is playing through an injury). Once ferland is back and we trade a bag of pucks for Simmonds I want
Ferland Pete Miller
Tanner bo Brock
Jake gaud Simmonds
Roussel sutter mac/motte/Bailey/Louie
Getting a little more snarl will serve the boys well in the playoffs.
Simmonds can’t skate. Ferland is finished for the year.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 8:39 am
by Mickey107
Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:59 am
Richardstroker69 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:03 am
Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 6:23 am
Someone needs to take Green aside look him square in the eye and say “no more Schaller”
Travis Lunch-bucket Greener
Travis really gets a hard on for schaller and even beagle (although I’m pretty sure beagle is playing through an injury). Once ferland is back and we trade a bag of pucks for Simmonds I want
Ferland Pete Miller
Tanner bo Brock
Jake gaud Simmonds
Roussel sutter mac/motte/Bailey/Louie
Getting a little more snarl will serve the boys well in the playoffs.
Simmonds can’t skate. Ferland is finished for the year.
As it gets closer to he deadline and if Ferland is done for the year (of course he should be), more players will come available, they always do.
Bob McKenzie was just putting obvious possibilities together. When Doyle says can't skate, that has always been his biggest hindrance causing
his
plus/minus to be generally shitty, so I would have to think wait.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:48 am
by ESQ
Topper wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:23 am
What it really comes down to is which team does the better media blitz to influence voters.
Funnily enough, since Tops posted this there has been a substantial uptick in national media articles about Hughes over Makar - the Athletic, Sportsnet, NBC, ESPN all have articles out about Quinn.
I better check out HFBoards to understand why Benning deserves no credit for either pick...
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 2:06 pm
by Tciso
Micky wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 10:39 am
It's Schaller's spot that should be taken by "The Enforcer" Doesn't have to be a star but has to be able to keep up, decent size, (not under 6.1),
really good team-mate and some nifty offensive and defensive skills, (meaning he wont hurt you in the plus/minus department), and no less than
30-35 point per years. And, has the rare ability to take off the other teams best players in scuffles and succinctly retaliate (modestly legally) when
our best players are jerked around. Can get right in to a hockey fight when necessary and has no history of concussions or neck problems.
This player should be around 23 to 25 years old with no ultra unique history. Sounds simple enough.
I found a possible fit, given your description.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 2:28 pm
by Mickey107
You recognized my superciliousness (cheekiness)...
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 3:06 pm
by Strangelove
"superciliousness" = Fuck off!
"(cheekiness)" W R O N G *sigh*
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:00 pm
by Mickey107
No. You; and I'm right,
....................................................again.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Jeff Cox@JeffCoxSports
Sources telling me Vancouver Canucks prospect Tyler Madden will miss next 4-6 weeks with broken finger. Huge loss for Northeastern.
4:33 PM · Feb 15, 2020
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Tryamkin thrown out of the game after flipping the bird.
https://twitter.com/ChrisFaber39/status ... de%3Dfalse
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 11:18 am
by Chef Boi RD
Madden was having a great season, feel bad for him
Good news - Gadjovich’s game is hitting all kinds of great new levels much to the dismay of Doyle. He’s looking like he could turn out to be a very good bottom 6 player
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 11:31 am
by Blob Mckenzie
Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 11:18 am
Madden was having a great season, feel bad for him
Good news - Gadjovich’s game is hitting all kinds of great new levels much to the dismay of Doyle. He’s looking like he could turn out to be a very good bottom 6 player
My dismay? I suggested drafting him before he was drafted.
Oh you mean where I commented that he had a poor rookie year last year... carry on painting the board brown. You do you.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 4:00 pm
by Strangelove
Micky wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:00 pm
Strangelove wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2020 3:06 pm
"superciliousness" = Fuck off!
"(cheekiness)" W R O N G *
sigh*
No. You; and I'm right,
....................................................again.
Seriously, this is the second time you've hosted your own little Word of the Day moment and got the definition wrong.
Sad!
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 4:12 pm
by Mickey107
Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 4:00 pm
Micky wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:00 pm
Strangelove wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2020 3:06 pm
"superciliousness" = Fuck off!
"(cheekiness)" W R O N G *
sigh*
No. You; and I'm right,
....................................................again.
Seriously, this is the second time you've hosted your own little Word of the Day moment and got the definition wrong.
Sad!
Seriously learn to use a dictionary! Your wrong. Have another Fig Newton.