Page 350 of 459

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:23 am
by Topper
What it really comes down to is which team does the better media blitz to influence voters.

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:24 am
by Cherry Picker
Disagree. I think people will vote for whoever has the most points at the end of the year. PPG goes Makars way, but number of games played goes Hughes. Also the Canucks are more of a surprise than the Avs and some of that reflects well on Hughes. I think people will Hum and Haw about these factors, but when it comes to the vote at the end of the season more voters will vote for whoever has the most points.

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:37 am
by Mickey107
My son wont back off saying it will be Makar if stat percentages stay the same. He says Makar is better "statistically per games played.
I say Hughes will win because he is exciting AND has amazing numbers. He is also garnering more attention by the media, IMO.
We both agree-it aint over.

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:55 am
by ESQ
Topper wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:23 am What it really comes down to is which team does the better media blitz to influence voters.
Well, the Athletic mid-season poll had 100% of first-place votes going to Makar, so we have to assume Colorado will win the media blitz.

I'm saying, at what point does it become impossible for the media-blitz/West Coast late-games bias to be overcome?

If Makar winds up with 60 points and Hughes has 70, I think that does it, regardless of the blitz and the "PPG" argument.

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:02 am
by Cornuck
I'll be honest, I haven't seen Makar play - but if he's even close to as talented as Hughes, controlling the PP, protecting the puck and otherwise playing like an 8 year vet - AND - he's getting the points, then it should a toss up.

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:36 pm
by Cherry Picker
Anyone have any insight about why Justin Bailey has not been able to stay in the NHL?
He has good size and looked incredibly fast yesterday. That was the first time I've seen him play, and am wondering why he hasn't been able to crack a line-up? He only played a little over 6 minutes, so it's hard to make a judgement. Is he poor defensively? Does he make dumb plays? Does he disappear or slow down often? Just curious about why one of you might think he will or won't make it.

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:36 pm
by rats19
Cherry Picker wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:36 pm Anyone have any insight about why Justin Bailey has not been able to stay in the NHL?
He has good size and looked incredibly fast yesterday. That was the first time I've seen him play, and am wondering why he hasn't been able to crack a line-up? He only played a little over 6 minutes, so it's hard to make a judgement. Is he poor defensively? Does he make dumb plays? Does he disappear or slow down often? Just curious about why one of you might think he will or won't make it.
Dunno... I liked what he brought

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:55 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
rats19 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:36 pm
Cherry Picker wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:36 pm Anyone have any insight about why Justin Bailey has not been able to stay in the NHL?
He has good size and looked incredibly fast yesterday. That was the first time I've seen him play, and am wondering why he hasn't been able to crack a line-up? He only played a little over 6 minutes, so it's hard to make a judgement. Is he poor defensively? Does he make dumb plays? Does he disappear or slow down often? Just curious about why one of you might think he will or won't make it.
Dunno... I liked what he brought
Me as well. He can fly for a big guy. The insertion of he and Mac gave the team some much needed size up front. No idea why Travis capped his ice time at 7 min, but that’s Green for ya. Keep the same lineup next game.

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:46 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Doc is probably angry that Schaller got sat out.

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:49 pm
by Strangelove
Doyle Hargraves wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:46 pm Doc is probably angry that Schaller got sat out.
WTF dude, I hate Schaller! :lol:

You're a sick demented sumbitch if you don't mind me saying so...

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:20 pm
by Chef Boi RD
Strangelove wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:49 pm

You're a sick demented sumbitch if you don't mind me saying so...
I don’t mind. It would’ve been top shelf if you added “not to mention your 5’-11” 255 lbs”

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:26 pm
by Strangelove
... "with a manhole-sized bald spot"? :mex:

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:28 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Chef Boi RD wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:20 pm
Strangelove wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:49 pm

You're a sick demented sumbitch if you don't mind me saying so...
I don’t mind. It would’ve been top shelf if you added “not to mention your 5’-11” 255 lbs”, then again I’m 5ft 4 , 270 lbs and Doc is 5ft 1 390 lbs. , you are like a giant compared to us chunks.
Fft

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:40 pm
by Cousin Strawberry
Strangelove wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:26 pm ... "with a manhole-sized bald spot"? :mex:
It went from dinner plate straight to manhole! Skipped platter altogether

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 6:23 am
by Chef Boi RD
Someone needs to take Green aside look him square in the eye and say “no more Schaller”

Travis Lunch-bucket Greener