Page 192 of 460
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:33 pm
by Carl Yagro
I can't believe with the sheer amount of the same repeated posts, over and over, that the Blobster hasn't earn the "Overlord Zealot" badge yet.
His over-zealousness is beyond CC Legend-ary.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:43 pm
by Cousin Strawberry
dangler wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:39 pm
[quote="Uncle dans leg" post_id=322448 time=1544554279 user_id=1787
My issue is the gaping hole on the back end. If you could shore up a massive weakness from a position of strength, why the fuck wouldnt you?
Because its not a "position of strength" if you let Boeser go Who replaces him??????
[/quote]
Dahlen
Minus Boeser but with the addition of say Werenski or Jones (the specific returning asset isnt that important as long as theyre one of the top young producing dmen in the league) would make this team a better, harder to play against unit without a doubt.
Doc...no room for Swee'Pea?
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:48 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:16 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 11:33 am
You can’t reason with a pack of zealots
I must be getting old because I can remember when grumpy ole McScroogie was a zealot!
Eblobnezer, you will be visited by three spirits...
Lol if I’m old you are ancient
I ain’t grumpy boss just trying to bring some balance to the board.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:50 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Hank wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:33 pm
I can't believe with the sheer amount of the same repeated posts, over and over, that the Blobster hasn't earn the "Overlord Zealot" badge yet.
His over-zealousness is beyond CC Legend-ary.
Kinda like the over and over
“Zomg we the best prospects in the history of the league”
Or Lord Benning or Benning is a genius seed spilling that is repeated 1000 times.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:50 pm
by Strangelove
The power of Christ compels you... The power of Christ compels you... THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU!!!
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:55 pm
by Mickey107
Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:48 pm
Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:16 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 11:33 am
You can’t reason with a pack of zealots
I must be getting old because I can remember when grumpy ole McScroogie was a zealot!
Eblobnezer, you will be visited by three spirits...
Lol if I’m old you are ancient
I ain’t grumpy boss just trying to bring some balance to the board.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:56 pm
by Richardstroker69
boeser is important cause he’s not a douche like hall, horvat, boeser, petterson and Quinn will set the tone for the team. 4 super competitive and hardworking guys with major drive to succeed. If boeser wasn’t so important in the dressing room I’d be willing to peddle him for a young top 2 dman, I doubt he’d have the value to capture one by himself because like button says they’re hard to come by, but boeser is epitome of what you want your leadership group to be which in my mind makes him untouchable.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:58 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
dangler wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:44 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 11:33 am
You can’t reason with a pack of zealots
..or a bad broken record
I feel like Philo Beddoe and Doc and his flunkies are the Black Widows
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:15 pm
by Mickey107
Richardstroker69 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:56 pm
boeser is important cause he’s not a douche like hall, horvat, boeser, petterson and Quinn will set the tone for the team. 4 super competitive and hardworking guys with major drive to succeed. If boeser wasn’t so important in the dressing room I’d be willing to peddle him for a young top 2 dman, I doubt he’d have the value to capture one by himself because like button says they’re hard to come by, but boeser is epitome of what you want your leadership group to be which in my mind makes him untouchable.
Bang on. You can see these guys talking and chirping it up all the time.
That's the ticket.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:18 pm
by Cousin Strawberry
Richardstroker69 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:56 pm
boeser is important cause he’s not a douche like hall, horvat, boeser, petterson and Quinn will set the tone for the team. 4 super competitive and hardworking guys with major drive to succeed. If boeser wasn’t so important in the dressing room I’d be willing to peddle him for a young top 2 dman, I doubt he’d have the value to capture one by himself because like button says they’re hard to come by, but boeser is epitome of what you want your leadership group to be which in my mind makes him untouchable.
Absolutely and his value is why he could command a top talent dman...much like Johansen did.
The reason a number of people keep spit balling this same thing over and over is because we almost certainly have the shittiest defense in the entire league. If we were loaded up nobody would dream of trading such a talent like BB
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:32 pm
by Island Nucklehead
dangler wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:39 pm
Uncle dans leg wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 10:51 am
My issue is the gaping hole on the back end. If you could shore up a massive weakness from a position of strength, why the fuck wouldnt you?
Because its not a "position of strength" if you let Boeser go Who replaces him??????
Bingo. We're not exactly stacked at forward. Columbus could afford to move Johansen because at the time they had guys like Saad, Atkinson, Jenner, Foglino, Hartnell, Dubinsky etc. playing well.
You know what would really help our situation right about now, a Sergachev or a McAvoy.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:11 pm
by Chef Boi RD
Island Nucklehead wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:32 pm
dangler wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:39 pm
Uncle dans leg wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 10:51 am
My issue is the gaping hole on the back end. If you could shore up a massive weakness from a position of strength, why the fuck wouldnt you?
Because its not a "position of strength" if you let Boeser go Who replaces him??????
Bingo. We're not exactly stacked at forward. Columbus could afford to move Johansen because at the time they had guys like Saad, Atkinson, Jenner, Foglino, Hartnell, Dubinsky etc. playing well.
You know what would really help our situation right about now, a Sergachev or a McAvoy.
2 concussions this season for McAvoy. The Canadians are not regretting trading Sergachev.
The book is not written on Juolevi, Grasshopper
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:18 pm
by Island Nucklehead
RoyalDude wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:11 pm
The book is not written on Juolevi, Grasshopper
Certainly not, just pointing out that we could really use some young NHL-ready dmen.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:41 pm
by Chef Boi RD
Island Nucklehead wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:18 pm
RoyalDude wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:11 pm
The book is not written on Juolevi, Grasshopper
Certainly not, just pointing out that we could really use some young NHL-ready dmen.
I thought you were a preacher for a patient rebuild?
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 5:09 pm
by Island Nucklehead
RoyalDude wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:41 pm
Island Nucklehead wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:18 pm
RoyalDude wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 4:11 pm
The book is not written on Juolevi, Grasshopper
Certainly not, just pointing out that we could really use some young NHL-ready dmen.
I thought you were a preacher for a patient rebuild?
I am. Which is why I don’t want to make any trade that fixes one gap by creating another. Drafting/developing is the way to go. Hopefully Juolevi develops into a useful top-4 for us, but he’s not trending “impact player” like some of the others in his draft class.