Page 190 of 716
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:50 am
by 5thhorseman
Topper wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 4:19 am
5thhorseman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 9:35 pm
Topper wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:40 pm
Climate change has been ongoing for over 4.6 billion years. The catastrophic events in earths history are due to geologic and or cosmic events. Species have come and gone. Mass extinctions have occurred. Earth kept rolling along as did life on Earth. To think our insignificant species can have a lasting effect is to be on the arrogant side of the debate.
Straw man. No-one is trying to make a lasting effect in terms of millenia. For the most part people are thinking of the immediate future, i.e. their kids and grandkids.
Princely the shortsighted arrogant belief that natural processes can be reversed in order to perpetuate a species in stasis.
The nice thing about natural processes is that they are very slow, giving mankind time to adapt. It's an acceleration of the change that we want to avoid.
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:26 am
by 2Fingers
5thhorseman wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:50 am
Topper wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 4:19 am
5thhorseman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 9:35 pm
Topper wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:40 pm
Climate change has been ongoing for over 4.6 billion years. The catastrophic events in earths history are due to geologic and or cosmic events. Species have come and gone. Mass extinctions have occurred. Earth kept rolling along as did life on Earth. To think our insignificant species can have a lasting effect is to be on the arrogant side of the debate.
Straw man. No-one is trying to make a lasting effect in terms of millenia. For the most part people are thinking of the immediate future, i.e. their kids and grandkids.
Princely the shortsighted arrogant belief that natural processes can be reversed in order to perpetuate a species in stasis.
The nice thing about natural processes is that they are very slow, giving mankind time to adapt. It's an acceleration of the change that we want to avoid.
Agreed 5, I even agree with Topper on some points but to blatantly say there is no climate change is the arrogant part. I guess it makes some people happy and they can go to bed at night.
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:34 am
by Mickey107
Natural changes can happen quickly too.
Asteroid
Collapsing or shifting faults
Super volcano
Massive solar flare (massive to us and our technology)
the aliens tell us the lease is up
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:36 am
by rats19
Reefer2 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:26 am
5thhorseman wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:50 am
Topper wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 4:19 am
5thhorseman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 9:35 pm
Topper wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:40 pm
Climate change has been ongoing for over 4.6 billion years. The catastrophic events in earths history are due to geologic and or cosmic events. Species have come and gone. Mass extinctions have occurred. Earth kept rolling along as did life on Earth. To think our insignificant species can have a lasting effect is to be on the arrogant side of the debate.
Straw man. No-one is trying to make a lasting effect in terms of millenia. For the most part people are thinking of the immediate future, i.e. their kids and grandkids.
Princely the shortsighted arrogant belief that natural processes can be reversed in order to perpetuate a species in stasis.
The nice thing about natural processes is that they are very slow, giving mankind time to adapt. It's an acceleration of the change that we want to avoid.
Agreed 5, I even agree with Topper on some points but to blatantly say there is no climate change is the arrogant part. I guess it makes some people happy and they can go to bed at night.
Nobody is saying the climate isn’t changing... nobody!!!!
It’s WHY and how much is the debate....whoosher

Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:37 am
by Cousin Strawberry
How about we stop breeding like rats...
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:40 am
by rats19
Uncle dans leg wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:37 am
How about we stop breeding like rats...
I got 1 kid ffs

Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:46 am
by Cousin Strawberry
Lol your pull out game needs work then
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:10 am
by rats19
Uncle dans leg wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:46 am
Lol your pull out game needs work then
You mean the” leave it ingame?” Lol
Too old now anyways

Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:20 am
by 2Fingers
rats19 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:10 am
Uncle dans leg wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:46 am
Lol your pull out game needs work then
You mean the” leave it ingame?” Lol
Too old now anyways
Maybe never too old
Richard Gere has gone from "American Gigolo" to a great American dad.
The 69-year-old actor looks set to become a father again, according to an Instagram post from his wife. Alejandra Silva,35, posted a photo Sunday that appeared to show the Dalai Lama and her husband touching her baby bump
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:34 am
by Per
rats19 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:06 pm
Reefer2 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:02 pm
Strange argues just for the sake of arguing.
Ever notice he is involved with “EVERY” major discussion and always on the wrong side?
Would’ve been more PC so say... always on the other side.
To say always on the wrong side is just arrogant
A guy at work has a sign on his desk saying "I will stop being arrogant if you stop being stupid."
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:56 am
by 5thhorseman
Reefer2 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:20 amMaybe never too old
Richard Gere has gone from "American Gigolo" to a great American dad.
The 69-year-old actor looks set to become a father again, according to an Instagram post from his wife. Alejandra Silva,35, posted a photo Sunday that appeared to show the Dalai Lama and her husband touching her baby bump
Would hate to be that kid. Can't even play sports with the old man without worrying about a hip fracture.
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:25 pm
by Cousin Strawberry
He can cry himself to sleep every night into that fat trust fund after daddy dick kicks the bucket
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:52 pm
by Strangelove
Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 7:28 pm
there is no scientific consensus on
anthropogenic climate change.
Reefer2 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:02 pm
Strange argues just for the sake of arguing.
Ever notice he is involved with “EVERY” major discussion and always on the
wrong side?
Reefer2 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:26 am
to blatantly say there is no climate change is the arrogant part.
Knowing Reefer2 as we do, it is fair to assume he has no clue as to what "anthropogenic" means
... and is too lazy to look it up.
"Nowhere man, please listen, you don't know what you're missing" - John Lennon
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:56 pm
by Strangelove
ukcanuck wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:20 am
Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Sep 23, 2018 7:28 pm
.
We can go "nack and forth all day" because indeed there is no scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change.
Climate change has been occurring since long before mankind was a factor.
The Paris Agreement had zero chance of reversing the current climate change trend.
The scientific consensus among astronomers is that a new Maunder Minimum (mini ice age) is on the horizon.
You can believe whatever you want, but you should be vigilant in this day and age to ensure you haven't been brainwashed.
No consensus according to those that don’t want there to be a consensus you mean.
Nope, there is either a “Scientific consensus” or there isn’t
… and in the case of anthropogenic climate change, there isn’t.
But “Scientific consensus” is an oxymoron (no not talking about you Reef)
Opinions have nothing to do with "Science"
... so really, who gives a fuck about a Scientific consensus amirite?

Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 2:20 pm
by Cornuck
Consensus or not, you must be happy that your orange hero is boosting coal and stalling renewables. It just makes sense to keep filling the air with toxins, right?
You must be doubly proud of the incredible choice he made for SCOTUS.
