BigTuna wrote:
Strangelove wrote:
BigTuna wrote:
Connor Brown was their 4th best rookie forward. He scored over 20 goals. Think about that for a second.
Connor Brown is 23 years old.
Every team has players in that age group scoring at that pace.
(hell, Canucks have 2 in Baer + Granlund and no one around here bats an eye)
(Horvat too of course but eyes are batted because of his overall awesomeness)
All you have is the 3 young forwards and who knows how they will do next year.
And 3 players does not a team make... honey! (with apologies to the Fonz)
Yours is a run-n-gun team so a little shit like Brown can pot 20 easily
... and now your team can overpay him thanks to that run-n-gun style.
The Cock and the Lamb have stated they need to get away from all that run-n-gun moving forward btw.
BigTuna wrote:
But TSN is brainwashing me, right?
UMMM... you have to have a brain before you can be brainwashed.
I never said it is
the media who is controlling you.
Good night sir!
The leaves had the best offensive depth in the entire NHL.
Leaves depth was never put to the test
... because the Leaves were the only team not to have a significant injury in their Top-9.
BigTuna wrote:
They had the most 60 point and 50 point players of any team. They had a 60 point player on all of their top 3 lines.
Run-n-gun style leads to more goals for and more goals
against... they gave up the
9th most goals!
Not ever gonna win anything with that run-n-gun.
Score alotta goals for losers to get excited about? Sure.
And lack of injuries helped boost those offensive numbers of course...
BigTuna wrote:
Every team has 23 year olds scoring 20 goals, but do they have 3 elite forwards at 19 and 20 scoring 60+ points as rookies? No, 0 teams have that besides the leaves.
UMMM so you agree with me 100%... Connor Brown is nothing to get excited about.
You're welcome.
BigTuna wrote:
You just don't know what it takes to build a team in 2017. You still think teams are built from the net out? LOL.
Great teams are built from the net out
... and for the hundredth time, that mostly means dee (since there are
6 playing any given night).
Leaves dee sucks severely, you have refused to acknowledge that all year
... although i finally got you to admit they have "weaknesses".
Of course you won't talk about what those weaknesses are...
BigTuna wrote:
The top goalies have 0 cup rings.
BigTuna wrote:
And just to clarify, Brown's 21 goals would have been tops on the Canucks. That's more goals than your star centre, Bo Horvat (Who you've claimed is just as good as Matthews). So no, you don't have guys like Brown.
What...
dafock... are you injecting?
Brown did
not have "
21 goals" and he did
not score "
more goals than Horvat"
... and I've
never said "
Horvat is just as good as Matthews"!
"
no, you don't have guys like Brown" - UMMM I just showed you 2 in Baer/Granlund
... and you just admitted "
Every team has 23 year olds scoring 20 goals".
Are all Leafers as whacked-out as you are?
BigTuna wrote:
And the leaves are not a "Run N Gun" team at all. Check the numbers.
Top-4 in both
shots-for and shots-against = very definition of run-n-gun.
"Are you stupid Forest?"
