Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderators: donlever, Referees

User avatar
Lancer
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 2077
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Kingston, Ontario

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Lancer »

Picker of Cherries wrote: ↑Thu Oct 08, 2026 2:48 am Pipe dream, or the perfect trade?
Rossi and Cotter (re-signed) for Edvinsson (re-signed).
That would create a big hole at centre. Great if you want to pile on the losses for a chance at DuPont, but it’s gonna get the forwards’s heads caved-in in the process for yet another young D with more potential than production. I just don’t see the sense of it.
Love the Sport. Love the Team.

Hate the League.
User avatar
Cousin Strawberry
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10059
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Cousin Strawberry »

Hes like 6'6 and plays like it. He's a stud

I'd dangle Willander and Coutts
If you need air...call it in
User avatar
UWSaint
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1473
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 5:37 pm

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by UWSaint »

Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Thu Oct 08, 2026 11:30 am Hes like 6'6 and plays like it. He's a stud

I'd dangle Willander and Coutts
The Red Wings still want to try to compete -- not that they necessarily should be. So I think they will prioritize roster players in moving Edvinsson and Larkin. While Willander is in the league, its only because he's on the Canucks. Cootes isn't ready.

Edvinsson is the kind of player that nearly every team should have an interest in. Already top 4 caliber, big wingspan, more room to grow as a player. Even complete rebuild teams like Vancouver can use a 23 year old on a 7 year deal..... But I don't think this is the target at the moment, and I would think the Canucks want to move those who don't have a chance at being part of a future core. Both Willander and Cootes might be, however remote the odds (I don't see Willander growing into 2-3 D caliber (though hope to be wrong); Cootes has "core" (1C or quality 2C) within his range, even if the most likely outcome is a not-terribly special 2C or 3C). I'm not saying that wouldn't be a reasonable offer for Edvinsson; I'm saying that kind of futures package is one made by a team who can better afford to part with young guys. And that the Wings (likley) want more "now."
Hono_rary Canadian
Post Reply