CanucksCorner.com Forums

I don’t think Garland is really tradeable right now, unless a team like the Sharks are interested.

He hits $6m next year with a NMC doesn’t he?

The Canucks expressing he isn’t on the market is essentially because the market is telling the Canucks there isn’t one for Garland.

Yeah...6 year 6 mill with a full nmc starting next year for a hot and cold 50 point player.

Be tough to get much more than a first if that I'd say.

Maybe Tampa if they think he's a link to a Cup run.

Still waiting for Myers to waive, come on Canucks get moving!

Anaheim is either going to have some top level GMing with contracts (as a Canuck fan, I don't know what that looks like), or they are expected to be about $10 mil over the cap.

MMac ($7mil) for Raty, Mancini and 2 2nds solves their problem, and fills another hole for us.

Tciso wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2026 9:12 am Anaheim is either going to have some top level GMing with contracts (as a Canuck fan, I don't know what that looks like), or they are expected to be about $10 mil over the cap.

MMac ($7mil) for Raty, Mancini and 2 2nds solves their problem, and fills another hole for us.

Personally, I’d stick with Mancini. He isn’t fully developed yet, but I like his potential and his long term positional value. He’ll be worth a lot more in a couple years.
I’d move DeBrusk though…..please!

With Mancini just signing a 2 year extension I think he is a keeper for now. A cheap 2 year contract. I like his play. He is still learning and next year he will get the whole season in Vancouver. I would be reluctant to trade him right now.

Yeah, but, if Anaheim needs to shed salary, I'd be happy with MMcT over Mancini and Raty. He is a way better centre than Raty, and we have internal replacements for Mancini.

It's gonna take more than that. You'd need to add that late 1st minimum