CanucksCorner.com Forums

Lancer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:33 am I can’t see him leading entries through way Quinn can.

That will be Broberg. He’s much, much more suited for the new NHL

Ok SKYO...

Find me an available tougher top pairing dman to bump stetcher outta here. He needs to primarily play sound in his end.

Jake muzzin or Peitrangelo are your model range which can include...either of them

The team could catch fire with a key acquisition at the right time.

Whatcha got?

The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:44 pm Ok SKYO...

Find me an available tougher top pairing dman to bump stetcher outta here. He needs to primarily play sound in his end.

Jake muzzin or Peitrangelo are your model range which can include...either of them

The team could catch fire with a key acquisition at the right time.

Whatcha got?

You drop a chunk of rock in that pipe tonight?

Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:48 pm

The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:44 pm Ok SKYO...

Find me an available tougher top pairing dman to bump stetcher outta here. He needs to primarily play sound in his end.

Jake muzzin or Peitrangelo are your model range which can include...either of them

The team could catch fire with a key acquisition at the right time.

Whatcha got?

You drop a chunk of rock in that pipe tonight?

Ya that was a baked as fuck post right after the final whistle and a cakey bud

No action in here, considering how close the trade deadline is.

I like Jake on the top line, and with Lind, Bailey, MacEwen, Podkolzin and Hoglander in the pipeline, the Canucks have most of their top prospects available on RW, sooooo....

Trade Brock Boeser for Noah Dobson
Then trade either Tanev for a first or Stecher for a second whichever won't resign at the price the Canucks want to offer.

Cherry Picker wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:00 am No action in here, considering how close the trade deadline is.

I like Jake on the top line, and with Lind, Bailey, MacEwen, Podkolzin and Hoglander in the pipeline, the Canucks have most of their top prospects available on RW, sooooo....

Trade Brock Boeser for Noah Dobson
Then trade either Tanev for a first or Stecher for a second whichever won't resign at the price the Canucks want to offer.

Fuck thats bold!

I like both moves but nobody will pay the 2nd for stetcher

The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:23 am

Cherry Picker wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:00 am No action in here, considering how close the trade deadline is.

I like Jake on the top line, and with Lind, Bailey, MacEwen, Podkolzin and Hoglander in the pipeline, the Canucks have most of their top prospects available on RW, sooooo....

Trade Brock Boeser for Noah Dobson
Then trade either Tanev for a first or Stecher for a second whichever won't resign at the price the Canucks want to offer.

Fuck thats bold!

I like both moves but nobody will pay the 2nd for stetcher

Toronto just traded a 2nd and a 3rd for a backup goalie, and the media says they won the trade. Over-paying is a thing again.

Tciso wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:39 am

The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:23 am

Cherry Picker wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:00 am No action in here, considering how close the trade deadline is.

I like Jake on the top line, and with Lind, Bailey, MacEwen, Podkolzin and Hoglander in the pipeline, the Canucks have most of their top prospects available on RW, sooooo....

Trade Brock Boeser for Noah Dobson
Then trade either Tanev for a first or Stecher for a second whichever won't resign at the price the Canucks want to offer.

Fuck thats bold!

I like both moves but nobody will pay the 2nd for stetcher

Toronto just traded a 2nd and a 3rd for a backup goalie, and the media says they won the trade. Over-paying is a thing again.

Ha! After Dumbass who's the next dumbass-est GM who will overpay for garbage?

The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:23 am ...nobody will pay the 2nd for stetcher

I am increasingly convinced Stetcher will be available to the highest bidder come the offseason, and that it’s not unlikely there will be no takers because teams interested (and their will be some) will gamble that he won’t be qualified and they can sign him to a better UFA than RFA deal. And the Canucks will not qualify him.

The Canucks will give Rafferty his shot. And Stetch can’t replace Tanev, so what’s the point.

I know BR has his defensive warts in Utica but from what i saw in the 5 or 10 games he played in last spring it had me thinking he was close to NHL ready....and that was before he found this offensive touch.

The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:23 am

Cherry Picker wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:00 am No action in here, considering how close the trade deadline is.

I like Jake on the top line, and with Lind, Bailey, MacEwen, Podkolzin and Hoglander in the pipeline, the Canucks have most of their top prospects available on RW, sooooo....

Trade Brock Boeser for Noah Dobson
Then trade either Tanev for a first or Stecher for a second whichever won't resign at the price the Canucks want to offer.

Fuck thats bold!

I like both moves but nobody will pay the 2nd for stetcher

Brock is in a slump. He is Pettersson's best friend. He will not be in a slump permanently. I've looked around and seen many trade Boeser
scenarios for whatevers. This is no different. ND could still bust. For the first time, this new Canuck team has got it's own identity.
I shouldn't get frustrated because I know there is no-way Benning moves Boeser. Not unless "he" asked.

Micky wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 9:32 am there is no-way Benning moves Boeser. Not unless "he" asked.

True however it is the pipe dream thread...your hit

The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 7:50 pm

Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:48 pm

The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:44 pm Ok SKYO...

Find me an available tougher top pairing dman to bump stetcher outta here. He needs to primarily play sound in his end.

Jake muzzin or Peitrangelo are your model range which can include...either of them

The team could catch fire with a key acquisition at the right time.

Whatcha got?

You drop a chunk of rock in that pipe tonight?

Ya that was a baked as fuck post right after the final whistle and a cakey bud

LoL & Muzzin, Pietrangelo ain't going nowhere.

Might not be able to trade for one right now, best bet is wait till July 1st to see if Pietrangelo makes it to UFA, but the Blues will have to pay him the big bucks to stay.

I'm not too concerned with Stecher as I am with Tanev, a defensive dman stalwart to help Hughes, whether he's injured or an UFA I'd like to replace Tanev with a tough S.O.B.

Could do that from within with Tryamkin, as he can and prefers to play the right side, he and Hutton had decent chemistry so he's proven he can play with a mobile LD, if all Tryamkin has to do is play defensively and be the big tough guy beside Hughes, that should be great for him.

Next season we could replace Tanev, Fantenberg and Stecher with Tryamkin, Juolevi and Rafferty.

Edler-Rafferty
Hughes-Tryamkin
Juolevi-Myers

I dont think we will ever see Juolevi hold down a permanent roster spot on Vancouvers blueline. Not unless he suddenly takes offseason training seriously...(i suppose it could happen...not likely at this stage)

The kid is a weakling

The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 10:58 am I dont think we will ever see Juolevi hold down a permanent roster spot on Vancouvers blueline. Not unless he suddenly takes offseason training seriously...(i suppose it could happen...not likely at this stage)

The kid is a weakling

To be fair Olli Juolevi has had back (June 2018) and knee (Dec 2018) surgeries to stall his development. Typically it takes two years post op to feel back to 100% for a pro sports player. Still has some soreness in other areas of his body I assume because he's using other muscles to compensate for his recovering bod'

But yeah this offseason will be really beneficial for him to get closer to 100%.