Lancer wrote: ↑Thu Jul 09, 2026 9:58 am
Mildly surprised, but Verbeek's options without Carlsson probably looked too dim to swallow. Does this leave Anaheim in the same boat as Edmonton and Toronto - long on scoring talent at the top end of the roster but can't defend to save themselves?
Carlsson will be a star, and will likely be that 1C management needs him to be. Whether he lives to to being the highest-paid player, well that's another question.
I think I might put together a longer post in a new thread about this offer sheet specifically and the offseason generally suggests about the NHL in less of a "news of the day" and more of a signpost for the future type of thing, but in terms of the news of the day, let me offer this.
Carlsson is 21 years old and he has every attribute that you want from a player. He can skate, make plays, be smart, be gritty, play defense, has size. He's not just a Jack Hughes/Conor Bedard offensive threat (really good players at the hardest and rarest skills in the game, but not in all aspects of the game).
To be a two way center who plays responsibility and is a point a game (sorry, Mëds, .96/ppg) player at 21. Because the "base" for the performance is so wide, he's not yet at his peak, and the projectability is really solid with this player. Injury risk is always the big thing, but that's always the case.
I was talking with another serious NHL fan yesterday and we tried to identify how many players, at this young age, were actually better centers than Carlsson last year (giving some credit to that players past, but just looking at where Carlsson is and not considering his rookie and sophomore seasons). There were 14 or 15 undisputed better, 7 or 8 more that were disputed -- one of us had them on one side, the other on the other. J Hughes and Bedard were disputed, to give you an idea. And we counted Barkov as better, giving him a pass for the season out. Among those undisputed, several more were in the category of close and we don't expect it for long. It might be that a player is coming off a career year in a season in very trying circumstances (Scheifele); it might be guys that have to experience an age decline at some point, right (Crosby), and it might be guys that maybe we are giving too much credit to older seasons and too much of an allowance for being misused (Matthews).
What's my point: Leo Carlsson is already a 1C, and a good one, and his future should be up and up and up. And that while its not probable that he's going to ever be the best player in the league, of the post-"generational" McDavid, Matthews, Mackinnon #1s, he has as good of a chance to be the second best center behind Celebrini (heck, forward) as anyone else. That's 10 drafts. The second best center. Sure, that's not set in stone. Bedard could be that guy if he overcomes the injury, gets some teammates, and develops a better two way game, maybe Hughes finds another level and starts avoiding injury, maybe one of the less high profile picks from the past 4 seasons goes through a late development explosion.
These players are rare, very rare. And while he might not become way more than he is, what he is is still damn good, and half the teams in the league don't have a better guy down the middle. If the offense doesn't get elite but just remains good, the all around game modes Kopitar, Barkov, as Lever said, Sundin. And think of the other 1Cs that didn't have (or play with) that size but were damned good defensively -- Bergeron, Toews, Datsyuk. Winners. Stylistically designed to play well against good opponents, to play well in the playoffs.
I'm not predicting Carlsson lifts the Cup since those guys (except Sundin....) did. Its not an individual sport. Those guys didn't absorb all that cap space, and there was more to how the teams were build than finding that kind of 1C. But its a damned good place to start. And its a place most teams will never come across in a draft. You pay for that. Out the nose. Verbeek should have figured that out a year ago. Now he paid for it out his ass.