Is there a god?

[Strangelove]

Abiogenesis (life from non-life) is scientifically impossible, thus life could only have been created by God.

Dunno what to tell ya pal, scientists have no idea how the hell life sprang from nonlife.

The first and therefore most important step in the theory of evolution by the way...

Try as they might, scientists have never been able to create "life in the lab" as they call it.

This is a scientific fact.

Sooo, because scientists can't figure out how life started it's therefore "scientifically impossible"?

Is this really your rationale?

Yes, that's my rationale, in fact that is the very definition of "scientifically impossible".

Abiogenesis is impossible according to our science = Abiogenesis is "scientifically impossible".

Can't travel faster than the speed of light, can't build a perpetual motion machine, can't evolve in a closed system (2nd Law)

... and can't have life coming from nonlife.

Evolution scientists presently control our scientific theories and abiogenesis is a subject they avoid at all costs.

(for obvious reasons)

If you want to know what dissenting scientists have to say, you have to go to places like this:

https://www.icr.org/article/impossibili ... beginnings

That is just one of dozens (hundreds?) of articles they have on the subject of abiogenesis.

Search their site for answers on other scientific topics if you dare.

Or you can just admit you already know God exists and we can move on from this charade...

[Cousin Strawberry]

Doc says there's room for all those in "heaven" ( the space ship) who let "God" into their hearts

C'mon Cuz, you know God exists as well as Per and Horsey and I do!

Will we all get a window seat?

[5thhorseman]

Abiogenesis (life from non-life) is scientifically impossible, thus life could only have been created by God.

Dunno what to tell ya pal, scientists have no idea how the hell life sprang from nonlife.

The first and therefore most important step in the theory of evolution by the way...

Try as they might, scientists have never been able to create "life in the lab" as they call it.

This is a scientific fact.

Sooo, because scientists can't figure out how life started it's therefore "scientifically impossible"?

Is this really your rationale?

Yes, that's my rationale, in fact that is the very definition of "scientifically impossible".

Abiogenesis is impossible according to our science = Abiogenesis is "scientifically impossible".

Can't travel faster than the speed of light, can't build a perpetual motion machine, can't evolve in a closed system (2nd Law)

... and can't have life coming from nonlife.

Evolution scientists presently control our scientific theories and abiogenesis is a subject they avoid at all costs.

(for obvious reasons)

If you want to know what dissenting scientists have to say, you have to go to places like this:

https://www.icr.org/article/impossibili ... beginnings

That is just one of dozens (hundreds?) of articles they have on the subject of abiogenesis.

Search their site for answers on other scientific topics if you dare.

Or you can just admit you already know God exists and we can move on from this charade...

I read your article.

As Per already stated, "you cannot prove the general non-existence of something.".

E.g.: you can't prove the non-existence of an evolutionary process that creates life from basic molecules.

Just because these creation scientists can't figure it out doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Basic logic.

[Cousin Strawberry]

Actually I want the aisle... I'm gonna be getting up and going down to the vehicle deck to smoke gaggers fairly regularly

[Strangelove]

As Per already stated, "you cannot prove the general non-existence of something.".

E.g.: you can't prove the non-existence of an evolutionary process that creates life from basic molecules.

Just because these creation scientists can't figure it out doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Basic logic.

Right, technically "life from nonlife" cannot be proven or disproven.

And technically "the existence of God" cannot be proven or disproven.

But we all inherently know the truth.

I, for one, have made my peace with God, and I advise you to do the same.

[5thhorseman]

Abiogenesis (life from non-life) is scientifically impossible, thus life could only have been created by God.

So you recant your statement?

[Strangelove]

Abiogenesis (life from non-life) is scientifically impossible, thus life could only have been created by God.

So you recant your statement?

Absolutely not, the statement is accurate all day long buddy!

Technically it also can't be proven whether or not a perpetual motion machine can be built.

But it is impossible for our scientists to build one.

Just as it is impossible for our scientists to create life from nonlife.

If something can't be done by our science, well dat dere is scientifically impossible.

(nothing is impossible for God though)

Now tell me, which do you prefer my friend, a game of semantics or a game of God-doesn't-exist?

Cuz, y'know... God... can create life from nonlife.

How do we know that?

Look around you.

He also built a perpetual motion machine and can travel faster than the speed of light.

And He can defy all the laws of physics, cuz hey, He created them.

He created this world... and the next.

I love science, but I would never put my faith in science.

I choose to put my faith in the Creator of science.

Plus, trust me, He's a great, great Guy...

[Topper]

The "life spark" in organic chemistry isn't ruled out as an impossibility and is avoided on bio-ethical grounds. But maybe you'd like to renew eugenics while you are at it.

[Strangelove]

The "life spark" in organic chemistry isn't ruled out as an impossibility and is avoided on bio-ethical grounds.

This may be true, but if our scientists can't do it, it is "scientifically impossible".

Join us in our semantics game!

[Topper]

The "life spark" in organic chemistry isn't ruled out as an impossibility and is avoided on bio-ethical grounds.

This may be true, but if our scientists can't do it, it is "scientifically impossible".

Join us in our semantics game!

It shows ethics in science is followed more stridently than the Biblical Ten Commandments

[Strangelove]

... ethics in science is followed more stridently than the Biblical Ten Commandments

Perhaps that used to be true, but alas, ethics in science went out the window a long time ago.

Devolution.

[5thhorseman]

If Doc can't get it up for the wife, he exclaims "it's scientifically impossible dear!".

In actuality he just spends too much time polishing his schtick

[Cousin Strawberry]

So if there was Devine intervention, THE absolute most likely scenario is life from another galaxy was misunderstood to be some sort of holy spirit when in fact... it was probably one of the grey alien species and their giant mother fuckin motherships

Heaven is the mothership Doc

There's only enough room for those who give up their buttholes for probing freely

[Strangelove]

Oh yeah. Came home last night with a giant bag of grass and am on my turd Doobie of the day already! Smoking this Highly Dutch Amsterdam Sativa strain. High 20s, giant puffy nuggs that expand minds and lung corpuscles

[Topper]

If Doc can't get it up for the wife, he exclaims "it's scientifically impossible dear!".

In actuality he just spends too much time polishing his schtick

immaculate