The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Thu Jul 23, 2020 2:46 pm
A fine little booty is a thing to behold Hankster but its very much pursuant to the booty being fine....and little
Sure, but if you're going to be bobbing for them apples, them better be fully waxed and smooth... and for gawd sake's, it better be washed clean.
The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Thu Jul 23, 2020 2:46 pm
A fine little booty is a thing to behold Hankster but its very much pursuant to the booty being fine....and little
Sure, but if you're going to be bobbing for them apples, them better be fully waxed and smooth... and for gawd sake's, it better be washed clean.
Sorry, but paying 6 games against 3 teams, and then only 2 games against 24 teams seems like in-breeding to me. I don't see the balance, and I don't see how the playoff standings would be calculated? Just go with 4 groups of 8. Keep it simple. Heck, just keep it the same for a while.
Within Division 4 games × 7 opponents = 28
Within Conference, Non-divisional 3 games × 8 opponents = 24
Inter-conference 2 games × 15 opponents = 30
Total 82
Once Seattle joins the west, they will do the same, which works fine. But they’ll have 16 opponents in the west, so the season will have to expand to 84 games. I like the current playoff structure.
Was just looking at how groups of four might work.
The break down above shows it would be more regional so a lot less travel.
I don’t really care if the Canucks play Conference non-divisional games 3 times or 2 times.
I like playing rivals more. To me games against Calgary and Edmonton are more interesting than Winnipeg and St. Louis because the Canucks see them more and are usually fighting more directly with them in the standings.
I've thought about it and I personally don't like the idea of seeing divisional rivals more then we do now.
Seems these days the rivalries are more of a chess match then a slug-fest (spirited game).
What I have noticed is the inter conference games (home and away) get nasty quite often.
Wasn't all that long ago the league structured the system to accommodate the home and away IC.
Na, I don't want to see more connor amd matthew or whatever the Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea-monsters have.
Micky wrote: ↑Fri Jul 24, 2020 10:54 amSeems these days the rivalries are more of a chess match then a slug-fest (spirited game).
I agree in some ways. Too many times teams want to get to overtime to get that single point. If they are going to have three points available in games that go to OT (two for the winner and one for the loser), they should give all three points to the team that wins in regulation. I think teams would try harder to win in regulation and those chess match type games would get more exciting.
Micky wrote: ↑Fri Jul 24, 2020 10:54 am
I've thought about it and I personally don't like the idea of seeing divisional rivals more then we do now.
Seems these days the rivalries are more of a chess match then a slug-fest (spirited game).
Calgary vs Edmonton.
Give your head a shake.
The 'Chain of Command' is the chain I am going to beat you with until you understand I am in charge.
Elliotte Friedman@FriedgeHNIC
Team travel lists of the 52 people headed into the EDM/TOR bubbles are due at 5ET. One name to watch for will be ARIZ GM John Chayka. Club says it is expected he will be included, but there appears to be some degree of uncertainty
12:06 PM · Jul 24, 2020
Adam Stephens @YEGsportsjunkie
Replying to @FriedgeHNIC
I am hearing Peter Chiarelli will be the new GM in Arizona and will be discussing contract with Hall;)
12:20 PM · Jul 24,
Adam Stephens @YEGsportsjunkie
Replying to @FriedgeHNIC
I am hearing Peter Chiarelli will be the new GM in Arizona and will be discussing contract with Hall;)
12:20 PM · Jul 24,
Why are you posting a bad joke from a random person Mick?
Adam Stephens @YEGsportsjunkie
Replying to @FriedgeHNIC
I am hearing Peter Chiarelli will be the new GM in Arizona and will be discussing contract with Hall;)
12:20 PM · Jul 24,
Why are you posting a bad joke from a random person Mick?
Because he has to post everything. he. sees. online.
Micky wrote: ↑Fri Jul 24, 2020 10:54 amSeems these days the rivalries are more of a chess match then a slug-fest (spirited game).
I agree in some ways. Too many times teams want to get to overtime to get that single point. If they are going to have three points available in games that go to OT (two for the winner and one for the loser), they should give all three points to the team that wins in regulation. I think teams would try harder to win in regulation and those chess match type games would get more exciting.
Yeah, that’s what most leagues do. 3 pts for a regulation win, 2 pts for ot or so win, 1 pt for ot or so loss, 0 pts for a regulation loss.
Whatever you do, always give 100 %!
Except when donating blood.
