Hopefully they're giving the Leaves nightmares in a coupla years.Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:01 pm Ottawa ends up with two of Drysdale, Byfield, Stutzle, Rossi, Raymond with a decent chance at grabbing Lafreniere. They will have a good squad moving forward.
2020 NHL Draft
Moderators: donlever, Referees
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP

- Posts: 15909
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Someday
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP

- Posts: 11753
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
Craig’s Buttons latest list of the lottery zone
1. Lafrenierre
2. Stuzle
3. Byfield
4. Perfetti
5. Drysdale
6. Quinn
7. Askarov
8. Rossi
9. Raymond
10. Lapierre
11. Zary
12. Sanderson
13. Holtz
14. Holloway
15. Forester
16. Lundell
1. Lafrenierre
2. Stuzle
3. Byfield
4. Perfetti
5. Drysdale
6. Quinn
7. Askarov
8. Rossi
9. Raymond
10. Lapierre
11. Zary
12. Sanderson
13. Holtz
14. Holloway
15. Forester
16. Lundell
Hey Trump, I’m ANTIFA.
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP

- Posts: 15909
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Someday
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
Got this from another site.NHL Dude 120, post: 171794107, member: 122577 wrote:1.Boston (0.714)-no change
2.St Louis (0.662)-no change
3.Colorado (0.657)-no change
4.Tampa Bay (0.657)-no change
5.Washington (0.652)-no change
6.Philadelphia (0.645)-no change
7.Pittsburgh (0.623)-no change
8.Vegas (0.606)--no change
9.Carolina (0.596)- increase by 2
10.Dallas (0.594)-no change
11.Edmonton (0.585)-drops by 2
12.NY Islanders (0.588)-drops by 2
13.Toronto (0.579)-drops by 1
14.Columbus (0.579)-drops by 1
15.Vancouver (0.565)- increase by 5
16.Nashville (0.565)- increase by 3
17.Florida (0.565)-drops by 1
18.Calgary (0.564)- increase by 1
19.NY Rangers (0.564)- drops 3 places
20.Winnipeg (0.563)- drops 5 places
21.Minnesota (0.558)-no change
22.Arizona (0.529)-no change
23.Chicago (0.514)-no change
24.Montreal (0.500)-no change
25.Buffalo (0.493)-no change
26.New Jersey (0.493)-no change
27.Anaheim (0.472)-no change
28.Los Angeles (0.457)-no change
29.San Jose (0.450)-no change
30.Ottawa (0.437)- no change
31.Detroit (0.275)- no change
Tie breaker
points percentage
number of points earned between 2 teams
team with the greater aggregate goals
compared the change based of the current standings on the NHL website.
If the NHL goes this route, Canucks pick would be #17.
But, depending on what the league decides, that pick could very well go to Joisey.
So who would we be missing out on at #17 Dude?
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP

- Posts: 9566
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
If there’s no playoffs, there’s no fucking way the Devils should automatically get that pick. Canucks should have the choice at least.
I’d hope if they had the choice that they’d keep the pick. Could get a pretty good player at that point sand kick the rock down the road one year.
I’d hope if they had the choice that they’d keep the pick. Could get a pretty good player at that point sand kick the rock down the road one year.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP

- Posts: 15909
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Someday
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
I dunno Doyle, I've heard it's not so awesome after the midway point of that first round.
Whether we get to keep the pick or not, I'm interested in who that player might be at say #17.
Whether we get to keep the pick or not, I'm interested in who that player might be at say #17.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP

- Posts: 9566
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
If Holtz or Lundell are tumbling like Button seems to think, either would be an excellent pick if available.Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:13 pm I dunno Doyle, I've heard it's not so awesome after the midway point of that first round.
Whether we get to keep the pick or not, I'm interested in who that player might be at say #17.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP

- Posts: 15909
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Someday
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
Thanks, I'll look them up.Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:43 pmIf Holtz or Lundell are tumbling like Button seems to think, either would be an excellent pick if available.Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:13 pm I dunno Doyle, I've heard it's not so awesome after the midway point of that first round.
Whether we get to keep the pick or not, I'm interested in who that player might be at say #17.
Any others?
Dude?
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP

- Posts: 11753
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
After the 9th/10th pick around there you’re getting a project, a decent project but no guarantee
I’d want to be in a spot to draft
Lafrenierre
Stutzle
Byfield
Perfetti
Drysdale
Quinn
Rossi
Askarov
Raymond
Next tier
Lapierre
Holtz
Lundell
Next tier
Zary
Sanderson
Holloway
Mercer
We’d be just outside that 3rd tier. Wallinder looks like a decent D prospect. Either way I wouldn’t shit my drawers if the Devils take the pick. I’m doing the JT Miller trade a thousand times over. Outside of Lafrenierre and Byfield maybe there’s no other 2020 prospect I’d rather more than JT Miller
I’d want to be in a spot to draft
Lafrenierre
Stutzle
Byfield
Perfetti
Drysdale
Quinn
Rossi
Askarov
Raymond
Next tier
Lapierre
Holtz
Lundell
Next tier
Zary
Sanderson
Holloway
Mercer
We’d be just outside that 3rd tier. Wallinder looks like a decent D prospect. Either way I wouldn’t shit my drawers if the Devils take the pick. I’m doing the JT Miller trade a thousand times over. Outside of Lafrenierre and Byfield maybe there’s no other 2020 prospect I’d rather more than JT Miller
Hey Trump, I’m ANTIFA.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP

- Posts: 9566
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
Holtz, Lundell and Zary are all excellent prospects. A lot better than Hendrix Lapierre. Pull your head out.
Just like 2017 was a garbage draft. There’s three guys in that draft that project to be top 20 players in the game and a host of other kids already making a mark and doing well. I had to read that shitstain from a couple of clowns over and over again about how shorty that draft was. It was an average draft, not the trainwreck the doomsday folk would have you believe.
2020 is an excellent draft.
Just like 2017 was a garbage draft. There’s three guys in that draft that project to be top 20 players in the game and a host of other kids already making a mark and doing well. I had to read that shitstain from a couple of clowns over and over again about how shorty that draft was. It was an average draft, not the trainwreck the doomsday folk would have you believe.
2020 is an excellent draft.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP

- Posts: 15909
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Someday
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP

- Posts: 11753
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
Holtz Lundell and Zary will not be better than Miller and nor do I care to spend the next 5 years waiting to see if they could be at least half as good. So again, I could care less about the 17th overall pick in which I imagine that Holtz, Zary and Lundell should be gone by thenDoyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:53 pm Holtz, Lundell and Zary are all excellent prospects. A lot better than Hendrix Lapierre. Pull your head out.
Just like 2017 was a garbage draft. There’s three guys in that draft that project to be top 20 players in the game and a host of other kids already making a mark and doing well. I had to read that shitstain from a couple of clowns over and over again about how shorty that draft was. It was an average draft, not the trainwreck the doomsday folk would have you believe.
2020 is an excellent draft.
Hey Trump, I’m ANTIFA.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP

- Posts: 9566
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
Nobody said they’d be better than Miller. And it’s a bit early to say that considering Miller himself broke out at age 26.
It’s about kicking the rock down the road one year. Adding a prospect to grow with the team considering they don’t have a 2nd in 2020 and just traded their 3rd best prospect.
Unless you think they have a shot at Luke Hughes in 2021.
You should always care regardless if you like the trade.
It’s about kicking the rock down the road one year. Adding a prospect to grow with the team considering they don’t have a 2nd in 2020 and just traded their 3rd best prospect.
Unless you think they have a shot at Luke Hughes in 2021.
You should always care regardless if you like the trade.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3750
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
The easy solution is to make it Canucks choice what year they wish to surrender the pick. Make them declare 1 week prior to the draft.
The only HW the Canucks need
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
And it should be a no-brainer. Keep the pick this year. Jim traded away a bunch of picks and if we give up the pick this year we have nothing in rounds 1 or 2, and maybe 3 and 4. I'd rather have a 1st this than no picks in the first 3 or 4 rounds and then only miss out on the 1st next year but have 2-4 still in the bank.Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 6:43 pm The easy solution is to make it Canucks choice what year they wish to surrender the pick. Make them declare 1 week prior to the draft.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3750
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: 2020 NHL Draft
That also gives him a year to try and get that pick back via trade.Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 9:20 pmAnd it should be a no-brainer. Keep the pick this year. Jim traded away a bunch of picks and if we give up the pick this year we have nothing in rounds 1 or 2, and maybe 3 and 4. I'd rather have a 1st this than no picks in the first 3 or 4 rounds and then only miss out on the 1st next year but have 2-4 still in the bank.Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 6:43 pm The easy solution is to make it Canucks choice what year they wish to surrender the pick. Make them declare 1 week prior to the draft.
The only HW the Canucks need
