Page 3 of 104

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 6:44 am
by Mickey107
Still haven't heard a thing on a contract for Horvat other than the million apart.
Bo said he wasn't attending the Worlds so he could devote full attention to these talks.
As it's looking, they really could have used him, maybe too much.
An injury is not something that would be a good thing for anyone with this going on.

Hope it's progressing well. It's kind of a landmark contract for our future.

In general, around the league, seems less players wanting to take part in this tourney.
Probably because we just had something similar in October.

Not the right thread but having the next two Olympics, in Asia, almost in the same time zone is stupid.
I know about big, big, money, maybe, but twice? Shouldn't happen.

I'm actually sorry the Canucks have to have their pre-season messed up this year. We really don't need this crap right now.....

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 9:47 pm
by SKYO
micky107 wrote:Still haven't heard a thing on a contract for Horvat other than the million apart.
Horvat's agent is probably using Scheifele's $6,125,000 per year contract is a comparable, or Barkov's $5.9M per.

While Canucks probably countered with Trocheck's $4.75m per.

Seguin is at 5.75, Tavares 5.5, BSchenn $5.125m

I think I'd be ok buying more UFA years and just give Bo $5.5M per x 8, hell 5.75M per.

I'd wager Scheifele got that contract because it was Winnipeg and nobody really wants to live in Winnipeg ya know unless they were born there or are heavily overpaid.

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 1:11 am
by Mickey107
Now I'm just hoping they get something done before camp.

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 6:37 pm
by Strangelove
micky107 wrote:Now I'm just hoping they get something done before camp.
Benning said this contract might take all summer, patience Mickster...

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 9:01 am
by Meds
SKYO wrote:
micky107 wrote:Still haven't heard a thing on a contract for Horvat other than the million apart.
Horvat's agent is probably using Scheifele's $6,125,000 per year contract is a comparable, or Barkov's $5.9M per.

While Canucks probably countered with Trocheck's $4.75m per.

Seguin is at 5.75, Tavares 5.5, BSchenn $5.125m

I think I'd be ok buying more UFA years and just give Bo $5.5M per x 8, hell 5.75M per.

I'd wager Scheifele got that contract because it was Winnipeg and nobody really wants to live in Winnipeg ya know unless they were born there or are heavily overpaid.
Bo's agent is an idiot if he's trying to use Scheifele's contract as any kind of leverage or league-wide precedent. If Bo can score 61 in 71 then his agent can talk about that kind of money.

I'd wager Scheifele got that contract because it was Winnipeg and nobody else who drafted him, and Cheveldayoff knew on draft day, and he knew last summer, that he had a first line center on his team who would turn around and reward him, which he did, with 82 points in 79 games to finish 7th overall in scoring.

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 9:38 am
by Blob Mckenzie
micky107 wrote:Now I'm just hoping they get something done before camp.
Sutter can fill in on the second line.

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 10:09 am
by Meds
Blob Mckenzie wrote:
micky107 wrote:Now I'm just hoping they get something done before camp.
Sutter can fill in on the second line.
The way the Sedin boys declined last season I'd say the 2nd line belongs to them.

Better save Sutter for 1st line duty.

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 11:46 am
by Mickey107
Mëds wrote:
Blob Mckenzie wrote:
micky107 wrote:Now I'm just hoping they get something done before camp.
Sutter can fill in on the second line.
The way the Sedin boys declined last season I'd say the 2nd line belongs to them.

Better save Sutter for 1st line duty.
Indeed. An early trail for the tanker.

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 11:58 am
by Cousin Strawberry
micky107 wrote:
Indeed. An early trail for the tanker.
With all those one on 3 rushes that fizzle into the corner off his stick we could call him captain Joe Hazelwood

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:30 pm
by SKYO
Island Nucklehead wrote:
Hockey Widow wrote:Rodin I think becomes FA due to the number of games he didn't play. Age plus lack of required NHL games and he's UFA. I'd wait until July for sure before deciding on him. But he's not worth anymore than his current deal.

I'd resign Chaput, Boucher and let Megna go. I'm fine bringing Skille back on another PTO and seeing.

Gudbranson ya I'd do a two year 3-4 million per. Horvat 8x6, Trymakin 2 year 2.5-3 per. Hutton got 2x2.8 so I could see Trymakin getting similar.
Agreed. Except Gudbranson is going to be closer $4M - $4.5M. He makes $3.5M right now...
Well surprise to us all Guds accepts a one year 3.5m contract!

https://www.nhl.com/canucks/news/vancou ... -289942970

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:37 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Lol like he had any leverage. Not a bad contract but wouldn't have minded three years at close to 4 annually. If he has a good year you have to really pay him or you have to move him.
K

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:23 pm
by Jovocop
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Lol like he had any leverage. Not a bad contract but wouldn't have minded three years at close to 4 annually. If he has a good year you have to really pay him or you have to move him.
K
The Canucks will have $14m cap space next year when the Sedins' contract expires.

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:55 pm
by Island Nucklehead
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Lol like he had any leverage. Not a bad contract but wouldn't have minded three years at close to 4 annually. If he has a good year you have to really pay him or you have to move him.
K
He's a UFA next summer, so yeah. He needs to either be re-upped by Christmas or moved at the deadline.

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:58 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Island Nucklehead wrote:
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Lol like he had any leverage. Not a bad contract but wouldn't have minded three years at close to 4 annually. If he has a good year you have to really pay him or you have to move him.
K
He's a UFA next summer, so yeah. He needs to either be re-upped by Christmas or moved at the deadline.
It's hard explaining things to children and their doctor

Re: Canucks Contracts

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 5:14 pm
by Chef Boi RD
So. The hillbilly/INbred translation of ^^^Hatfield and McCcoy's^^^ opinion(s) regarding the Gudbranson signing? A good signing? Lack of hillbilly hissy fitting on their part must mean they like it.