CanucksCorner.com Forums

https://x.com/Canucks_Enjoyer/status/20 ... 74366?s=20

^ Great use of AI...... I think.

Who had cap space to take both?

Topper wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2026 10:00 am Moving the #3 pick will be an easier sell to the market than moving the 1st

I saw your other post about packaging the pick with Scooter for Power…..

Power is 23. Do you think that it makes sense to go that route over drafting Verhoeff, or Reid, who will be more likely to hit NHL stride alongside any young forwards that land in the system over the next few seasons? Power will likely be late 20’s, also he’s a lefty which are easier to come by.

I haven’t watched Power play, just looked at his numbers, which neither over nor underwhelm. Is he beast mode enough to make it worth passing on the youngers?

Topper wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2026 11:11 am Who had cap space to take both?

I’d have to go diving through puckpedia archives. Probably nobody in a straight across. But if rebuilding was the avenue, then it could’ve been made to work with retention and cast-off returns.

Again, I do agree, maximize the return and don’t hold tightly to the “both or neither”.

If this organization actually had managed to execute a plan then I would say that a lesser return in order to keep Vancouver as a player’s destination would be worthwhile. History being the ultimate decider, the Aquanuck trainwreck says it all. Time to just go full Vegas and treat it as a business from your best player to your lowest prospect and pick.

UWSaint wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2026 10:31 am All what UW said…..

Your mention of linking generational talents via sweaters got me thinking about jerseys….

While I don’t see McKenna as being on that generational level, he does fit Toronto because they will think he is.

Also, there will be more TML McKenna jerseys sold in the GTA before puck drop in October than there would be Vancouver McKenna jerseys sold continent-wide by the end of his ELC.

Topper wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2026 11:11 am Who had cap space to take both?

If we are taking the Rucks late in the first round and they have had anywhere near the career the Sedins put together this is a problem I'd be willing to deal with years down the road.

Realistically they will be 3rd potentially 2nd line players, likely not to have the contracts the Sedins had. Which would make them easier to move later in their career if needed, it also means they are unlikely to have the trade protection top end talent has late in their NHL career.

Expectations of later first round picks are much lower so the risk of being tied to twins is also less. Makes it far more palatable in my mind anyways.

Aaronp18 wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2026 1:02 pm

Topper wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2026 11:11 am Who had cap space to take both?

If we are taking the Rucks late in the first round and they have had anywhere near the career the Sedins put together this is a problem I'd be willing to deal with years down the road.

Realistically they will be 3rd potentially 2nd line players, likely not to have the contracts the Sedins had. Which would make them easier to move later in their career if needed, it also means they are unlikely to have the trade protection top end talent has late in their NHL career.

Expectations of later first round picks are much lower so the risk of being tied to twins is also less. Makes it far more palatable in my mind anyways.

Was not this the same scouting report/projection on the Sedins in a historically weak draft?

Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2026 2:32 pm

Aaronp18 wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2026 1:02 pm

Topper wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2026 11:11 am Who had cap space to take both?

If we are taking the Rucks late in the first round and they have had anywhere near the career the Sedins put together this is a problem I'd be willing to deal with years down the road.

Realistically they will be 3rd potentially 2nd line players, likely not to have the contracts the Sedins had. Which would make them easier to move later in their career if needed, it also means they are unlikely to have the trade protection top end talent has late in their NHL career.

Expectations of later first round picks are much lower so the risk of being tied to twins is also less. Makes it far more palatable in my mind anyways.

Was not this the same scouting report/projection on the Sedins in a historically weak draft?

Which should make us all the more inclined to take them when only factoring as players.

Social Media has its moments.....

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DX-xTTTM ... ZkZmQ1dXM0

Megs posted earlier but so good didn't mind seeing it twice.

Sharks fans gotta be loving this more than us.

Lancer wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2026 9:55 am

theman wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2026 8:33 am Craig has the Canucks picking Caleb Maholtra at 3. Days he has 1C potential, that is the first time I have head of that. Craig also has Stenberg falling to 4th.

I just don’t see Malhotra being demonstrably better than his dad in the NHL.

I agree, but don't count out the propensity of Ownership to draft based on marketing potential. I called the Jett Woo pick on that basis -- perhaps my only successful hockey prediction ever.

Until the draft actually happens, I will dare to hope that Ownership has learned its lesson, but they really don't seem like the lesson-learning types.

UWSaint wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2026 10:31 am During the day yesterday, I sent a text to my fantasy hockey group (who were soliciting predictions) and I said, "It will be Toronto. And if I am wrong, its the Rangers. But I'm not wrong." I wish I had posted that prediction here.

Of course, I sent this because conspiracies are fun. And you know what? Not particularly unimaginable.

Deep stuff as usual UWSaint. In this day and age of deepfakes ... we cannot confirm that what we are shown is legit. The ball handler from NJ looked nervous as fuck. It's a dog and pony show seen far too often in big money or politics. Perhaps one day technologies like smart contracts will create verifiable proof of results in such matters including elections. A lot of people loudly proclaim that it's not rigged. But Toronto winning hints at something being awry. Of course the leaves won right?