2024 Offseason - moving forward

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3958
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by Meds »

Strangelove wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2024 3:51 pm
theman wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2024 3:13 pm HW, I think there is a trade to be made with a team like Edm or Wash, both are in cap hell and will probably need a LTIR contract to make things work for them cap wise.

Canucks could possibly leverage a roster player that needs a change of scenery or a decent prospect for Poolman’s LTIR.

Or Baldie could leverage that LTIR contract in a way I haven’t even thought of yet, which he probably will.
The last thing a team in cap hell needs is an LTIR contract.

As I keep saying, an LTIR contract doesn't give you extra cap space.

If a team right up against the cap acquired Poolman, they could then spend $2.5M over the cap

... but that's COUNTING the $2.5M.

Zero advantage, and actually a hinderance, as has been discussed in some posts above.

You usually have to attach an asset to unload LTIR contracts on a team with loads of cap space.

A poorer team trying to reach the cap floor is ideal.
There is one time it’s useful for a team like that.

When they have a roster player (Player A) that they want to keep who on LTIR and is about to return but they don’t have space. In that case offering them $2.5M in LTIR room in exchange for a roster player (Player B) they are willing to part with. So in this case Player B’s cap hit out + Poolman LTIR in lets them activate Player A.

Now, a team would have had to have been doing a piss poor job of cap and asset management to land themselves in a situation where a rival GM could leverage them that way.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15912
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by Strangelove »

Yeahno, that doesn't work at all Mëds lol.

The team in question would be better off trading Player B elsewhere for a draft pick.

Also, we wouldn't have the cap room to bring in Player B if Poolman were on LTIR.

(we'd already be spending to the cap)
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3958
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by Meds »

Strangelove wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2024 5:38 pm Yeahno, that doesn't work at all Mëds lol.

The team in question would be better off trading Player B elsewhere for a draft pick.

Also, we wouldn't have the cap room to bring in Player B if Poolman were on LTIR.

(we'd already be spending to the cap)
Not if Player B’s salary is not >/= to Player A.

The Poolman scenario was just in keeping with what we were talking about. Obviously it doesn’t work for us.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
User avatar
donlever
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:07 pm

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by donlever »

You spin me right round baby right round
Like a record baby right round
Round round.
DeLevering since 1999.
User avatar
donlever
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:07 pm

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by donlever »

Aaronp18 wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:04 pm Jake DeBrusk
6’1” 198, Edmonton AB

Danton Heinen
6’2” 195, Langley BC

Derek Forbort
6’4” 216, Duluth MN

Vincent Desharnais
6’7” 226, Laval PQ

Kiefer Sherwood
6’ 194, Columbus OH
...to add to this point and something that (somewhat surprisingly) has not been discussed this last week.

Fernstrom - 6'1" 187
Patterson - 6'1" 192
Romani - 6' 195
Alcos - 6'3 " 185
Sansonnens - 6'4" 198
DeLevering since 1999.
User avatar
donlever
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:07 pm

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by donlever »

Mëds wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 9:34 pm Everything I've heard about Zegras is a hard pass. He's not liked or respected by his fellow players.
Not sure about this Mëds.

Zegras is tight with the Hughes boys.
DeLevering since 1999.
User avatar
Carl Yagro
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm
Location: On wide shoulders...

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by Carl Yagro »

Yeah, lets go and get Zegras. I just don't ever see Hoglander being able to pull off a Michigan in the NHL :lol:

Butt seriously, I think we have some flexibility to upgrade our depth further into the season. Just got to wait and see what we have in-house and what's available.
Heavy is the Tarp... :cry:
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15912
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by Strangelove »

Mëds wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2024 5:40 pm
Strangelove wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2024 5:38 pm Yeahno, that doesn't work at all Mëds lol.

The team in question would be better off trading Player B elsewhere for a draft pick.

Also, we wouldn't have the cap room to bring in Player B if Poolman were on LTIR.

(we'd already be spending to the cap)
Not if Player B’s salary is not >/= to Player A.

The Poolman scenario was just in keeping with what we were talking about. Obviously it doesn’t work for us.
LOL, you don't get it, trust me...
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
donlever
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:07 pm

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by donlever »

I guess it's not that simple really.

:drink:
DeLevering since 1999.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15912
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by Strangelove »

Thing is, it IS simple, I don't get why some people can't see it.
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
donlever
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:07 pm

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by donlever »

Yeah...Mëds and I had a debate about simple this weekend which is what I was moreso referring to....
DeLevering since 1999.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15912
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by Strangelove »

donlever wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2024 7:17 pm Yeah...Mëds and I had a debate about simple this weekend which is what I was moreso referring to....
Okay, I see.
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
donlever
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:07 pm

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by donlever »

Better explained...

I was being a smarmy prick.

Unlike me I know.
DeLevering since 1999.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15912
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by Strangelove »

donlever wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2024 7:22 pm I was being a smarmy prick.
:shock:
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10437
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: 2024 Offseason - moving forward

Post by Chef Boi RD »

donlever wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2024 6:23 pm
Mëds wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 9:34 pm Everything I've heard about Zegras is a hard pass. He's not liked or respected by his fellow players.
Not sure about this Mëds.

Zegras is tight with the Hughes boys.
Apparently, he’s a bit of a headcase. The coaches in a Anaheim are pretty frustrated with him from what I understand. Seems to not really understand the “team” concept. Selfish.
”This was how twentieth-century Fascism began: with a magnetic leader exploiting widespread dissatisfaction by promising all things.” - Madeleine K. Albright - Fascism: A Warning
Post Reply