donlever wrote: ↑Tue Nov 04, 2025 10:40 am
I think it was scrambling to fill holes on a hope and a prayer.....
I think they thought Ricky was to hard on the poor lad and gave him another chance...
I think Kravstov is a soft, weak player and should stay in Russia..
I think they should have looked at other options....
I think I worry about whether our entire Management group, owners on down, are capable of doing what it takes to make this work...
...and by doing what it takes, for the Rutherford has done it before crowd, that could equate to he and Allvin being handcuffed to limited free roll proactivity by FA and the boyz....
Nah. It was a no downside move. It didn't prevent them from looking at other options -- Canucks still had a few spaces in the 50 man to add more players. Whether they should have looked at more options is certainly a criticism, but *nothing* about signing Kravtsov impacted their ability to look at more options.
Also, the signing didn't crowd out prospects in Abby; Canucks needed (and need more) non-prospect AHL types to ice a lineup, and its not like Abby is busting with winger prospects who'd miss out on ice time.
And I don't think they penciled him in to contribute when they made the move. It was more like -- we have his rights, he just finished a KHL season with the kind of stat line that would have teams poking around if he were a FA (he was 6th in the league in points; 9th in goals), he was a once a top prospect, and let's see if he learned anything. It is sort of like being given a lottery ticket. You still don't think you are going to win just because you accept the gift. But there's a small small chance.
But Kravstov didn't learn anything. Not even enough to look like a better option than Labate or McEachern, guys in their 30s who are AHL fillers. And so the most likely thing happened -- a thing so likely ex ante that it was something the team and player contemplated and negotiated for.
I'm not an apologist for this group, but this nothing move is not evidence of their shortcomings.