Page 43 of 103

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Wed May 10, 2017 10:22 pm
by Island Nucklehead
RoyalDude wrote:
Island Nucklehead wrote:The new-age rebuilders around here knew Benning was rebuilding before he did. That's some genius level shit.
^^^^Displaced Agression^^^

Something's not right in IslandFarms life
Your taxes, my wallet! lol my life is just fine dude.

Ottawa is an exciting town these days, no need for the personal attacks bud.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Thu May 11, 2017 7:14 am
by Blob Mckenzie
Strangelove wrote:Image
So am I. But people are likely getting tired of reading the same thing. Being able to handle a rebuild is entirely different than being pissed off with the people who are executing it.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Thu May 11, 2017 3:55 pm
by Strangelove
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Being able to handle a rebuild is entirely different than being pissed off with the people who are executing it.
True, but no one wants to admit he/she can't handle a rebuild.

Those who can't handle a rebuild instead tend to "blame" whoever is in charge.

Anxiety and denial are funny things... and the folks in charge make good scapegoats.

Just sayin...

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Thu May 11, 2017 4:49 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
I'll let you have last word Lumpy

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Fri May 12, 2017 6:48 am
by Mickey107
European skill, North American heart.

Quite the statement.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Fri May 12, 2017 6:56 am
by Chef Boi RD
micky107 wrote:European skill, North American heart.

Quite the statement.
I love it!

Getting a real kick out of the HF panty bunchers having a melt down over it. LOL. Skill with heart, baby! Jim is the cats ass. Keep pissing off the whimps, Jim. Those who can't handle a rebuild/retool, whatever yuh want to call it are coming to the surface like flying colours. Keep cool, stay calm, baby!

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Fri May 12, 2017 10:10 am
by damonberryman
Does not matter what thread. The usual suspects are gnawing away at each other. I dislike the constant attacks. Got caught up in one a while back and stopped posting so much. The usual suspects may be having fun. I don't know but why not do it privately? I realize this has been brought up before but it seems to do no good.

Anyhow I expect nothing to change but I had to get it off my chest. There are some really good hockey minds here and I will continue to follow them. Also there is humour and I can always use a laugh.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 9:21 am
by Blob Mckenzie
Is this the last year of Elmer's contract ? I am unsure if h signed a four year deal or if it was five.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 11:54 am
by Chef Boi RD
Listen Bubbles, the Berryman wants you to stop with your insults to those who appreciate the Genius of Lord Benning, our fearless leader.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 12:10 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
RoyalDude wrote:Listen Bubbles, the Berryman wants you to stop with your insults to those who appreciate the Genius of Lord Benning, our fearless leader.
I just asked what his contract length was. Obviously nobody else knows ? Is he a lame duck or just a dumb fuck ? Or both ?

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 3:12 pm
by Strangelove
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Is this the last year of Elmer's contract ? I am unsure if h signed a four year deal or if it was five.
It will be interesting to see how long of an extension Builder Jim gets...

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 4:39 pm
by Hockey Widow
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Is this the last year of Elmer's contract ? I am unsure if h signed a four year deal or if it was five.
I think it was a five year deal, same as Trevor's.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 5:05 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Hockey Widow wrote:
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Is this the last year of Elmer's contract ? I am unsure if h signed a four year deal or if it was five.
I think it was a five year deal, same as Trevor's.
If so he has two years left. There certainly won't be an extension forthcoming based on his current "work".

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 8:30 pm
by Strangelove
Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Hockey Widow wrote:
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Is this the last year of Elmer's contract ? I am unsure if h signed a four year deal or if it was five.
I think it was a five year deal, same as Trevor's.
If so he has two years left. There certainly won't be an extension forthcoming based on his current "work".
The fruit of Jimmy's labour will be evident to all... just in time for his extension.

Try to focus on 1-2 years from now...

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 10:20 pm
by ukcanuck
RoyalDude wrote:
micky107 wrote:European skill, North American heart.

Quite the statement.
I love it!

Getting a real kick out of the HF panty bunchers having a melt down over it. LOL. Skill with heart, baby! Jim is the cats ass. Keep pissing off the whimps, Jim. Those who can't handle a rebuild/retool, whatever yuh want to call it are coming to the surface like flying colours. Keep cool, stay calm, baby!

So I'm not alone in not seeing what the big deal about saying we want Euro skill and North American heart ?


If anything I might be insulted that he included Americans with Canadian heart.