Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:57 pm
I just noticed the thread title. Arachnid was probably dreaming of chomping on a cock when he typed that out.
https://canuckscorner.com/forums/
The food-processing, farming and hospitality industries rely on low-cost labour from eastern Europe. Cutting it off would create labour shortages that would force firms to adapt their business models: more automation, higher wages or just closing down. Employers may also demand a scheme to admit temporary low-skilled workers.
... a big risk is that tighter migration controls will simply mean more illegal migration. Illegal immigrants are less likely than legal ones to pay taxes, receive the minimum wage or secure normal employment or health-and-safety protections.
http://www.economist.com/news/britain/2 ... drawbridgeFar from stealing jobs, EU migrants take ones that natives spurn; Britain’s employment rate is at a record high. Since they tend to be young, employed and taxpaying, migrants are net contributors to the state. For that reason they should ease, not raise, pressure on public services and housing — though there is a case for a “migrant impact fund” to channel their taxes towards more local public spending.
Post-Brexit curbs on migration will do economic damage. Other EU leaders have made clear that they also imply more limited British access to the EU’s single market, delivering a further hit to the economy.
How is it I'm a Hillary lover exactly? As far as I can remember I've not posted anything in favour of Hillary other than to expose one one of your links accusing her of getting a rapist off lightly and to laugh about it 30 odd years later as false and inaccurate. In that particular case I was not interested in supporting Hillary but rather to expose the inaccuracies in your overly right-leaning erection campaign.Strangelove wrote:
This seems very true and has me wondering about "the trickle-down effect".
Do supporters take on the traits of Donald/Hillary?
For example, take the two most blatant outspoken Hillary-lovers in this thread.
They have accused... moi... (a Trump supporter?) of saying mean things!
Technically speaking I've merely accused you of championing a particular political bent and anyone who has followed your position on numerous different discussions would come to the natural conclusion that are the accusations below.They have also spread nothing but lies about yours truly:
Actually somewhere in this thread I believe I called you a supporter of the bad kind of libertarianism:"libertarian"....
I don't think I'm far off...
"Zionist"…
See "right-libertarian" above...“Anarcho-Capitalist”… “paleo-conservative”... "right wing conservative"
“elitist Jew”...
Je ne comprends pas? is it not so...yes?“Climate Change denier”...
we'll get around to these yet, this thread needs this derailment like it needs Griz' education on his creationism folly.“a member of the Moral Majority”... “homophobic”
one who “falsely identifies a PEDOPHILE as a PEDOPHILE”
one who “doesn’t understand gay rights because he ID’s a PEDOPHILE as a PEDOPHILE”
(yes all lies, the last two comments being, as they say, "Crazy Like Hillary")
This is actually true, I came into this debate leaning on the fence but the outrageousness of the posts trying to debunk science of global warming AND anthropogenic global warming pushed me firmly into the arms of reasonableness and science.All this from a guy who had to be forced out of the AGW closet…
http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/vie ... 25#p263725
…. only to then proceed on a full-blown copy-N-paste AGW crusade!
still not one word acknowledging that all your links are from committed conservative sources.(all the while screaming it’s a political issue)![]()
Honest Doc, I don't think your mean. I think you employ diversionary tactics to focus on.." the social institutions that enforce conditions of capitalism, while rejecting institutions that function in opposition to these institutions...that maintain only those functions of government necessary to maintain conditions of capitalism. They defend wage labor, land rents, socio-economic inequality, inheritance, and uneven concentrations of wealth."… and yes, all the while crying about “mean things” yours truly says.![]()
That was Tweedledee, then there was Tweedledum who called yours truly:
A “short, fat and balding… cowardly little fuck who may watch child porn”
A “punk ass mother fucker”… who might be “tracked down”
(presumably by a deranged psychopath)
Yup, like Hillary these “mama’s boys” spread psycho-lies whilst calling one in the other camp “mean”.
Indeed.Things that make you go HMMM!!
So does Forest Gump, but that doesn't mean he should be running a country.micky107 wrote:I
Politically, Donald Trump has "A CLEAN SLATE".
Chance GardenerCornuck wrote:So does Forest Gump, but that doesn't mean he should be running a country.micky107 wrote:I
Politically, Donald Trump has "A CLEAN SLATE".
Well, Donald may have a clean slate politically, but only because he's a total n00b in that field.micky107 wrote:I will be chastised, called a fool, be told I don't know anything and on and on about the post that I am going to make right now.
Politically, Donald Trump has "A CLEAN SLATE".
Hillary has a slate and if you took a bulldozer and worked it till it ran out of that nasty stuff we call fuel, you may find that slate, after removing all the soil, dirt, decomposing shredded paper, etc.
+++++Topper wrote:Chance GardenerCornuck wrote:So does Forest Gump, but that doesn't mean he should be running a country.micky107 wrote:I
Politically, Donald Trump has "A CLEAN SLATE".
Missing the point.micky107 wrote:I will be chastised, called a fool, be told I don't know anything and on and on about the post that I am going to make right now.
Politically, Donald Trump has "A CLEAN SLATE".
Hillary has a slate and if you took a bulldozer and worked it till it ran out of that nasty stuff we call fuel, you may find that slate, after removing all the soil, dirt, decomposing shredded paper, etc.
I think trump is doing a fine enough job with his own words and actions to let people form opinions about him.Strangelove wrote:... brainwashed the two of them against Trump!
I don't know about you but I pointed out that the New York Times has been owned by the same Jewish family since 1896 and I posted a university study claiming that the paper is soft on Israel's actions in Palestine and overly harsh on Palestine attempts to free itself from occupation.Mondi wrote:Well Strange you're the one with the memory that stretches back into pre-history. When did I say the Jews own the media?Strangelove wrote:Hillaryiously, both Mondi and UK are on record as believing THE JEWS control said 90%griz wrote: About 90% of American Media is owned by six corporations. THAT, Mondi, is the mainstream media.
... if they're right, THE JEWS may have brainwashed the two of them against Trump!
You mean besides the one on the top of your head?micky107 wrote:Missing the point.micky107 wrote:I will be chastised, called a fool, be told I don't know anything and on and on about the post that I am going to make right now.
Politically, Donald Trump has "A CLEAN SLATE".
Hillary has a slate and if you took a bulldozer and worked it till it ran out of that nasty stuff we call fuel, you may find that slate, after removing all the soil, dirt, decomposing shredded paper, etc.
Well of course you boys deny it in the light of day, but in the passion of the moment you let things slip:ukcanuck wrote:I don't know about you but I pointed out that the New York Times has been owned by the same Jewish family since 1896 and I posted a university study claiming that the paper is soft on Israel's actions in Palestine and overly harsh on Palestine attempts to free itself from occupation.Mondi wrote:Well Strange you're the one with the memory that stretches back into pre-history. When did I say the Jews own the media?Strangelove wrote:Hillaryiously, both Mondi and UK are on record as believing THE JEWS control said 90%griz wrote: About 90% of American Media is owned by six corporations. THAT, Mondi, is the mainstream media.
... if they're right, THE JEWS may have brainwashed the two of them against Trump!
So yeah, from that Doc tars me as the 90 percent Jewish media conspiracy guy ...
A very Christian Zionist thing to do wouldn't you say ?
ukcanuck [color=#FF0000]Mon Oct 06, 2014 6:12 pm[/color] wrote:Jewish owned newspapers and clearly biased voicesStrangelove wrote: You are completely out of touch with reality and should avoid any/all Israeli–Palestinian debates.
Don't sweat it though, a lot of hardcore leftists become paranoid & delusional over time.
Just the way she goes....
Israel is monitored very closely in these matters.
They warn palestinian citizens where needed/possible, they are famous for this...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wor ... ut-to-bomb
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/20 ... ass-threat
http://jcpa.org/article/hamas-israel-co ... al-points/
I could offer up thousands of links.
Google is your friend.
ukcanuck [color=#FF0000]Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:04 pm[/color] wrote:Well documented?Strangelove wrote:You'd be surprised to learn that some of us actually pride ourselves on discerning the truth.ukcanuck wrote: You accept what you accept because it falls in line with what you already believe.
I do the same.
As a matter of fact, we consider anything less to be uncivilized.
Hard to believe you're a teacher.
UK: "Kids, burn your history books and just believe whatever you want to believe."
Is Israel included in your geography text books over there?![]()
Thanks for finally admitting you choose to believe any/all unsubstantiated negative crap about Israel at face value.
And ignore anything positive about Israel no matter how well documented.
It doesn't make something well documented if it's reported over and over in a syndicated newspaper
The New York Times is wholly owned by a Jewish family who are clearly apart of the established jewish dominated media community in North America.
The same interest group that has funded american geopolitics for the last hundred or so years.
The same interest group that cut its teeth in propaganda in two world wars
Yeah that's exactly what... theyCornuck wrote: Anyone who was paying attention when he first started his campaign had already formed their opinions and did not need to be brainwashed. At all.