Re: Canucks News N Notes 26-27
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2026 1:25 pm
You could see his game had taken a nosedive early on. I even posted that we likely have lost the ability to receive max return in trading that asset.
Hronek is only 29. Seems odd to me for his puck recovery rate to drop so precipitously, but it would be adequately explained by an injury that he could play through without exacerbating, but that still impaired his play. I'm thinking maybe something like shoulder tendonitis, where the unimpeded motions still let him pass and make some kinds of shots, but there would be some some directions in which he could exert little force on his stick.Megaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2026 1:10 pm https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/777427 ... s-canucks/
I don't really know Cliff, other than agreeing with Cisco that they're overplaying him. I don't know what his previous standard was.Ronning's Ghost wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2026 4:08 pmHronek is only 29. Seems odd to me for his puck recovery rate to drop so precipitously, but it would be adequately explained by an injury that he could play through without exacerbating, but that still impaired his play. I'm thinking maybe something like shoulder tendonitis, where the unimpeded motions still let him pass and make some kinds of shots, but there would be some some directions in which he could exert little force on his stick.Megaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2026 1:10 pm https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/777427 ... s-canucks/
Have we got any sources on the Canucks' training staff?
I guess my alternative hypothesis would be that there was always some tactical weakness in his approach to puck battles, and now the rest of the League has the book on how to beat him. But I would have expected something like that to have come out much earlier.
Has anyone seen Hronek's numbers when D-Petey was playing with him vs Buium?
https://www.nhl.com/canucks/team/training-staffMegaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2026 4:45 pmI don't really know Cliff, other than agreeing with Cisco that they're overplaying him. I don't know what his previous standard was.Ronning's Ghost wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2026 4:08 pmHronek is only 29. Seems odd to me for his puck recovery rate to drop so precipitously, but it would be adequately explained by an injury that he could play through without exacerbating, but that still impaired his play. I'm thinking maybe something like shoulder tendonitis, where the unimpeded motions still let him pass and make some kinds of shots, but there would be some some directions in which he could exert little force on his stick.Megaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2026 1:10 pm https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/777427 ... s-canucks/
Have we got any sources on the Canucks' training staff?
I guess my alternative hypothesis would be that there was always some tactical weakness in his approach to puck battles, and now the rest of the League has the book on how to beat him. But I would have expected something like that to have come out much earlier.
Regarding the training syaff, the drop down menu for Canucks personnel on their website has been blank all season. Maybe they don't have trainers anymore.
Megaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2026 4:45 pmI don't really know Cliff, other than agreeing with Cisco that they're overplaying him. I don't know what his previous standard was.Ronning's Ghost wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2026 4:08 pmHronek is only 29. Seems odd to me for his puck recovery rate to drop so precipitously, but it would be adequately explained by an injury that he could play through without exacerbating, but that still impaired his play. I'm thinking maybe something like shoulder tendonitis, where the unimpeded motions still let him pass and make some kinds of shots, but there would be some some directions in which he could exert little force on his stick.Megaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2026 1:10 pm https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/777427 ... s-canucks/
None of our theories are mutually contradictory; it could be any combination of those factors.Picker of Cherries wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2026 4:27 pm He has never been a great PK defensemen.
If he wasn’t first over the boards to kill penalties, he’d be playing better.
They just don’t have anyone else.
I would be worried about Buium, but I will take comfort in the fact that he is one and two seasons behind Willander and EP25, respectively, and defence takes longer to learn. That, and that knowledgeable posters here seem confident that Buium remains on his expected development curve.
I don't think the 'pump' phase has begun. I think they want to hang on to him in a mentorship/leadership role for at least this season.