Page 41 of 103
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sat May 06, 2017 5:20 pm
by rats19
nuckster wrote:RoyalDude wrote:Ster providing some decent entertainment by trying to fit in somewhere. Gold
Right, thats why i post everyday and repeat a particular kind of message/theme continuously - in synch with a few other long-time posters - sound familiar Polly?
Drivel aside, lets hope Benning frikin 'nails it' this year! And if he does, and you want go on about him being a genious, so be it, I'll live with it... gladly.
I would also like that nuckster....
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 12:35 pm
by Strangelove
Blob Mckenzie wrote:nuckster wrote:
Pretty balanced response there BM.
That's what I provide Nuckster. A voice of reason and a balanced analysis of the team and its management.
Lol the ster just dubbed you "Bowel Movement" I think he was being sarcastic!
Two years ago you became an anti-Canuck troll, a caricature of yourself.
Sure you've been trying to backpedal from that hopeless position for the last few months.
But the archives = our friend.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 1:02 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
There's no back pedalling at all. It's called objectivity you should try it sometime.
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 1:07 pm
by Strangelove
Blob Mckenzie wrote:There's no back pedalling at all. It's called objectivity you should try it sometime.
Nope, you blasted every move Benning made... and didn't make...for 2 years.
Then you realized you were painting yourself into a corner... so you now throw him the odd compliment.
Mckenshie shitsh his shortsh....
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 1:17 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Strangelove wrote:Blob Mckenzie wrote:There's no back pedalling at all. It's called objectivity you should try it sometime.
Nope, you blasted every move Benning made... and didn't make...for 2 years.
Then you realized you were painting yourself into a corner... so you now throw him the odd compliment.
Mckenshie shitsh his shortsh....
That's bullshit. I was fine with the acquisition of Baertschi, liked Gudbranson but thought the cost was a bit high. Liked the Boeser pick even though I liked Konecny a bit better. Liked the Tryamkin pick. Liked the deals for Bieksa and Garrison. Now you resort to lying to try and keep up when getting mopped up......... sad little old guy in the Bible Belt.
You are the one who painted himself into a corner by defending every single move or non move the man made. You are incapable of any sort of constructive criticism and have become basically a board clown.
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 1:21 pm
by Strangelove
Strangelove wrote:Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Mckenshie shitsh his shortsh....
That's bullshit.
Shit is shit.
I plan to use the archives to prove my point about your backpedaling... when I get some time.
How does next month work for you?

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 1:23 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Whatever helps you sleep at night
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 1:29 pm
by Strangelove
BTW the archives prove I originally despised the Sbisa and Dorsett re-signings.
As a matter of
fact, all this "genius" stuff started when I said
in my anger a few times:
"If Sbisa ever turns out to be a decent #5 dee, Benning is a genius"
Or words to that effect.
And now here we are.
Many times I said I wanted my Canucks to walk away from pending-RFA Sbisa rather than re-sign him...
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:46 pm
by Hockey Widow
Sorry Doc. Gotta agree with Blob here. Many times he has showed support for Benning moves he likes. Now the fact he doesn't like many is a different story

but he has been consistent in saying he likes some moves and names them. He isn't as black and white as some partisan posters.
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:47 pm
by Strangelove
Hmmm find me one single post from the summer of 2015 to the summer of 2016
... where Blob said one single positive thing about Lord Benning.
Sure he says a few positive things
now but that's only due the positive influence of yours truly.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 7:36 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Already covered what I considered positive. Learn to read it's getting tiresome.
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 7:38 pm
by Strangelove
One single post in that 15 month time-period.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 7:43 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Strangelove wrote:One single post in that 15 month time-period.

Nope ,more than that. Sick of repeating myself.
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 8:59 pm
by Strangelove
Anyone? Find me such a Blob post...
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!
Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 4:34 pm
by Island Nucklehead
Blob McKenzie on Mon Jun 27, 2016 1:36 pm wrote:I liked the pick and I liked the pickup of Gudbranson.
Blob McKenzie on Fri Jun 24, 2016 6:30 pm wrote:When Elmer marks a good move I applaud him for it. Ie the Gudbranson trade.
Blob McKenzie on Wed Jul 13, 2016 7:40 pm wrote: I am one of the more critical posters of Ignitowski but I have liked some of his moves and have hated a few more. One thing I can't knock him for is waffling or being scared to make a move. Sometimes he's too brave though
Blob Mckenzie on Fri Aug 05, 2016 9:15 pm wrote: I for one love his decisiveness even if I have only liked a handful of his moves. He has balls, I'll give him that.