Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:12 pm
damn boats keep sinking
CanucksCorner.com Forums
https://canuckscorner.com/forums/
US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
Page 266 of 716
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2019 12:02 am
Actually still labour shortages in most of the EU. Not so much in Greece, Italy and Spain, but elsewhere
Even Hungary, with its staunch anti-immigrant stance, has roughly one million Ukrainians manning their factories, as many skilled Hungarians have moved north and/or west. They don’t like to talk about it, but Hungary would grind to a halt if all their immigrants left.
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2019 12:26 pm
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2019 12:36 pm
Fuck thats awesome
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2019 9:15 am
Impeachment? Yeahno, it's over (you petty bitter traitors you).
Just as Horowitz is set to release the FISA-abuse report, gotta love the way things are going...
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2019 6:14 pm
Everyone always knew it was never going to get past the senate republicans are far too partisan for any other outcome, so more likely all that the impeachment process did was tell us all we all already knew. Trump is a liar and cheat and his base love him for it.Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2019 9:15 am
Impeachment? Yeahno, it's over (you petty bitter traitors you).
Just as Horowitz is set to release the FISA-abuse report, gotta love the way things are going...
In the end it doesn’t matter then that he manipulated a foreign government for his own gain. If integrity mattered they wouldn’t have voted for the crooked real estate developer in the first place.
With that said, the senate notwithstanding, there is hope that good ordinary people will deliver a guilty verdict
on Election Day.
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2019 6:56 pm
UK.... it might not be obvious to you at this time.
But I believe you are 100% wrong...
But I believe you are 100% wrong...
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:23 am
Lol Rats, I believe that it’s 100% clear that you believe I am wrong. I suppose it’s possible, but what if I’m 100% correct and there is not an altruistic bone in that fat man’s body?
Although I hear he did get some kind of law against cruelty to animals so I’ll give him credit for that.
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:06 am
Plus he is working on establishing the Mexican cartels as terrorist organizations and thus giving more flexibility to the police etc...ukcanuck wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:23 amLol Rats, I believe that it’s 100% clear that you believe I am wrong. I suppose it’s possible, but what if I’m 100% correct and there is not an altruistic bone in that fat man’s body?
Although I hear he did get some kind of law against cruelty to animals so I’ll give him credit for that.
And a thousand other non published good things
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:34 am
Like pardoning war criminals????rats19 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:06 amPlus he is working on establishing the Mexican cartels as terrorist organizations and thus giving more flexibility to the police etc...ukcanuck wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:23 amLol Rats, I believe that it’s 100% clear that you believe I am wrong. I suppose it’s possible, but what if I’m 100% correct and there is not an altruistic bone in that fat man’s body?
Although I hear he did get some kind of law against cruelty to animals so I’ll give him credit for that.
And a thousand other non published good things
Although Trump was talked out of authorizing torture by his advisers, the president’s ardor for violations of the laws of war has manifested itself in his decisions to intervene in war-crimes cases on behalf of the defendants. In four separate cases since the beginning of his presidency, and for the first time in the history of modern warfare, an American president has aided service members accused or convicted of war crimes, against the advice of his own military leadership.
Many former officials have warned that Trump’s war-crimes pardons undermine “good order and discipline,” a jargony way to say that they signal the rules don’t matter. A military force where the rules don’t matter is not one that can fight effectively or with the necessary moral or strategic restraint.
“I will always stick up for our great fighters,” Trump told the crowd at a rally in Florida yesterday. “People can sit there in air-conditioned offices and complain, but you know what? It doesn’t matter to me whatsoever.”
The seven Navy SEALs who told investigators that Gallagher shot unarmed civilians from his sniper nest, including “a girl in a flower-print hijab who was walking with other girls on the riverbank,” after being warned that doing so could “cost them and others their careers” were not sitting in an office. The soldiers who testified that Lorance ordered his unit to fire on unarmed Afghans who were “definitely not any type of threat” were not luxuriating in an air-conditioned building. They were at just as much risk on the battlefield, and yet they chose to adhere to the rules they were charged to uphold.
“Trump’s actions constitute a betrayal of the military, of all of those service members who actually exercise disciplined restraint in the heat of battle,” VanLandingham says. “His actions betray the real warriors, and betray the American people who expect those in uniform to wield force per the law and to comport themselves honorably on and off the battlefield.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... es/602731/In a different world, Trump’s pardons might have put him at risk. The international law of armed conflict holds that commanders bear responsibility for reporting and punishing war crimes by their subordinates. After World War II, the United States hanged enemy commanders such as General Tomoyuki Yamashita for failing to prevent the indiscriminate slaughter of civilians by his troops. Yamashita, who did not personally order such atrocities but who, as commander, was held responsible for failing to prevent or punish them, petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus, which was denied. Neither American law nor the Constitution recognizes command responsibility in this way, but that did not spare Yamashita.
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 1:07 pm
Yup.
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 2:37 pm
Oh wow, I’m sure no one could have predicted Fox would spin it that way, eh?
This is what Reuters says:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKBN1Y02MO
And of course, unless there is clear evidence of some spectacular criminal offence, committed personally by the president, and caught on video,the GOP-controlled Senate is never going to go against Trump. That’s also why Pelosi was so reluctant to start the process.
But having the US public hear testimony on how Trump abuses power and uses the power in the office for his own personal gain coukd definitely sway the election. Then again, you never know.
Most of those who self-identify as republican or democrat have already made their mind up, so the battle is really just for the few undecided voters in the middle. Even though Trump of course won’t be found guilty by his own minions, making his crimes public could be the beginning of his downfall.
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 3:13 pm
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 5:54 pm
Not so sure that this is a great idea. Didn’t the republicans under Bush create all these circumventions of the law by creating the term war on terrorism as something so bad it warranted going around things like “innocent until proven guilty?” Now he’s going to expand the meaning to include Mexican criminals?rats19 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:06 amPlus he is working on establishing the Mexican cartels as terrorist organizations and thus giving more flexibility to the police etc...ukcanuck wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 7:23 amLol Rats, I believe that it’s 100% clear that you believe I am wrong. I suppose it’s possible, but what if I’m 100% correct and there is not an altruistic bone in that fat man’s body?
Although I hear he did get some kind of law against cruelty to animals so I’ll give him credit for that.
And a thousand other non published good things
What’s next? Slippery slope.
He could solve the drug war tomorrow by decriminalizing drugs and start treating it as a medical issue. Expand Obama care to include addiction services and tackling poverty.
Oh and perhaps going after american organized crime like the pharmaceutical industry and the arms industry.
Now that would be impressive for a real people’s champion.
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 11:00 pm
Yeahno, as per usual, your image of Don is completely out of synch with reality.
Stop with the fake pics.
Here’s what he really looks like in a sport he actually practices:
Or tennis. He also plays tennis:
