CanucksCorner.com Forums

BigTuna wrote: I'm confused

... and grass is green, sky is blue.

Blob Mckenzie wrote:

Strangelove wrote:

Blob Mckenzie wrote:I'd trade anyone on the Canucks or any of their prospects for Mathews or Marner. I'd trade anyone but Horvat for Nylander.

Whatever Bubbles, everyone knows you're a closet Leaves fan...

I hate Toronto but Mathews and Marner are studs. Canucks have nobody close to that

See, this is what everyone means about you being in the closet.

Strangelove wrote:

BigTuna wrote: You are incorrect. A player is still a prospect until one full season.

I didn't say it.... Hockey's Future said it.

But yeahno, we should just run with whatever random definition you pull out of your stuckless hole...

But Craig Button clearly think they are wrong and you keep quoting his list.

BigTuna wrote: But Craig Button clearly think they are wrong and you keep quoting his list.

You continue to call the same Leaves "core players" AND "prospects".

Get a dictionary...

Strangelove wrote:

BigTuna wrote: But Craig Button clearly think they are wrong and you keep quoting his list.

You continue to call the same Leaves "core players" AND "prospects".

Get a dictionary...

I don't understand. You can't be a core player and prospect? Auston Matthews is a prospect. How can you not include him as a core piece going forward? Should Bozak be instead?

BigTuna wrote: I don't understand

... and sun is hot, night is dark.

Strangelove wrote:

BigTuna wrote: I don't understand

... and sun is hot, night is dark.

I love how you will never answer your own bullshit. Even you don't believe it.

What prospects on Vancouver would you take over Matthews and Marner? ( I do not expect an answer).

As soon as someone GLOATS, I've noticed something bad or embarrassing quite often occurs.

Somebody needs to point out to Button that he forgot to add Matthews, Marner, Nylander, Laine, Werenski, Stecher, Tryamkin, Konecny, Vesey, Carlo. Chychrun, Provorov, Rantanaen, etc to the list

Has anyone reminded Tuna that this list is a top 50 for NHL affiliated players NOT playing in the NHL?

Hey Tuna, the leaves have Shit nothing coming in the way of prospects NOT playing in the NHL! the Canucks have 4 on that list!!!! To go along with 21 year old Horvat and 22 year olds - Stecher, Hutton and Tryamkin!

I would even add that the Canuck non listees - Gaunce, Brisebios, Lockwood, Virtanen, McEneny, Cassels, Labate all would rank ahead of the non listee - Maple Smurfs!

RoyalDude wrote:Somebody needs to point out to Button that he forgot to add Matthews, Marner, Nylander, Laine, Werenski, Stecher, Tryamkin, Konecny, Vesey, Carlo. Chychrun, Provorov, Rantanaen, etc to the list

Has anyone reminded Tuna that this list is a top 50 for NHL affiliated players NOT playing in the NHL?

Hey Tuna, the leaves have Shit nothing coming in the way of prospects NOT playing in the NHL! the Canucks have 4 on that list!!!! To go along with 21 year old Horvat and 22 year olds - Stecher, Hutton and Tryamkin!

I would even add that the Canuck non listees - Gaunce, Brisebios, Lockwood, Virtanen, McEneny, Cassels, Labate all would rank ahead of the non listee - Maple Smurfs!

Even if that were true(Which it is not), is that really terrible news? They have by far the best group of rookies any team has had in years. If they had aging stars like Vancouuver, sure. They've been led by teenagers this year.

Hence old man Boyle

I'm shocked somebody traded for Burrows AND gave him a two year extension. You guys go on and on about the leaves but Ottawa will never contend for a cup with that garbage owner.
And they did Toronto a massive favour by taking Dion's entire cap hit from them. Thank you Ottawa.

Topper wrote:Hence old man Boyle

But he's big! Size matters to you guys so much.

BigTuna wrote:I'm shocked somebody traded for Burrows AND gave him a two year extension. You guys go on and on about the leaves but Ottawa will never contend for a cup with that garbage owner.
And they did Toronto a massive favour by taking Dion's entire cap hit from them. Thank you Ottawa.

This is not a bash the sens thread Charlie....

rats19 wrote:

BigTuna wrote:I'm shocked somebody traded for Burrows AND gave him a two year extension. You guys go on and on about the leaves but Ottawa will never contend for a cup with that garbage owner.
And they did Toronto a massive favour by taking Dion's entire cap hit from them. Thank you Ottawa.

This is not a bash the sens thread Charlie....

I need to hear your view on it...

You guys got a better player than the leaves gave up for Boyle. Dahlen is a very solid prospect.
If Burrows would not come to Ottawa without an extension Ottawa should have said screw you and walked away.
It's just a shockingly dumb move on their part. No wonder their fans are staying away. They do not believe ownership really wants to win.