Just Not ready

The primary goal of this site is to provide mature, meaningful discussion about the Vancouver Canucks. However, we all need a break some time so this forum is basically for anything off-topic, off the wall, or to just get something off your chest! This forum is named after poster Creeper, who passed away in July of 2011 and was a long time member of the Canucks message board community.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15859
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: Just Not ready

Post by Strangelove »

Cousin Strawberry wrote: Sat May 03, 2025 7:23 am I definitely would select the Voluptuous option in total recall
Image
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Cousin Strawberry
MVP
MVP
Posts: 8072
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: Just Not ready

Post by Cousin Strawberry »

:scowl:

Demure/aggressive/sleazy was the other interesting choice
If you need air...call it in
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15859
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: Just Not ready

Post by Strangelove »

Sorry Cuz.

Great movie.
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
donlever
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:07 pm

Re: Just Not ready

Post by donlever »

Heeeyyyy Cuz...(says she/her/it)

Image
DeLevering since 1999.
User avatar
Tciso
MVP
MVP
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:44 am

Re: Just Not ready

Post by Tciso »

JelloPuddingPop wrote: Fri May 02, 2025 12:41 pm
PP's plan (still listed on the Conservative website) - was to remove the GST on new homes as well.

One of the earliest decisions by Carney is to limit government spending growth to 2% annually. Lower than inflation. So far so good.
Poilievre's plan was for all new homes. Carney was just for 1st time buyers. Carney has a government bureaucratic program with another identifiable group to divide us. Poilievre has a tax rebate.

Also Carney's 2% totally depends on what it is 2% of. If he means this year's budget is 2% higher than last year, that is not in alignment with his stated budget deficits and spending commitments
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
User avatar
JelloPuddingPop
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1029
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:53 pm

Re: Just Not ready

Post by JelloPuddingPop »

Tciso wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 11:56 am
JelloPuddingPop wrote: Fri May 02, 2025 12:41 pm
PP's plan (still listed on the Conservative website) - was to remove the GST on new homes as well.

One of the earliest decisions by Carney is to limit government spending growth to 2% annually. Lower than inflation. So far so good.
Poilievre's plan was for all new homes. Carney was just for 1st time buyers. Carney has a government bureaucratic program with another identifiable group to divide us. Poilievre has a tax rebate.

Also Carney's 2% totally depends on what it is 2% of. If he means this year's budget is 2% higher than last year, that is not in alignment with his stated budget deficits and spending commitments
Helping 1st time buyers is a better point. People who already own, shouldn't need Gov. help to buy more (or another) new house. The idea is they already have the equity necessary. Try to help new buyers get into the market. Makes more sense to me.

If you think prices for services and procurement will only go up 2% in the coming year. Then I can't help you with this.
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9098
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: Just Not ready

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

Cheesey can get a crib in Saskatchewan for 35 K. As long he has a case of Lucky, a Sheriff, a doctor/vet, somewhere to pedal his furs and the running water isn't too cloudy, he's happy hillbilly.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
JelloPuddingPop
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1029
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:53 pm

Re: Just Not ready

Post by JelloPuddingPop »

PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.

And people believe this fool cares about Government spending. Just look at his salary and expenses compared to his peers.
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3912
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Just Not ready

Post by Meds »

JelloPuddingPop wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 6:03 pm PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.

And people believe this fool cares about Government spending. Just look at his salary and expenses compared to his peers.
Yeah. I’m not a fan of the parachuting.

And the lack of connection…..lame…..none whatsoever outside of that he was born in Calgary, and U of C is his Alma mater. Weak.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
User avatar
JelloPuddingPop
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1029
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:53 pm

Re: Just Not ready

Post by JelloPuddingPop »

Mëds wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 9:31 pm
JelloPuddingPop wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 6:03 pm PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.

And people believe this fool cares about Government spending. Just look at his salary and expenses compared to his peers.
Yeah. I’m not a fan of the parachuting.

And the lack of connection…..lame…..none whatsoever outside of that he was born in Calgary, and U of C is his Alma mater. Weak.
Mid Mëds. Like saying Carney has a connection to the NWT.

Two decades away from AB. That's a life time for some voters.

I don't want my taxes to pay for some douche who his own riding decided against.
User avatar
Tciso
MVP
MVP
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:44 am

Re: Just Not ready

Post by Tciso »

JelloPuddingPop wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 6:03 pm PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.
I am not a fan of parachute candidates either, but all major parties do it. I am more surprised that a 25 yr old kid would run in Carleton instead of a Western riding where it is way easier to win, and where he has deeper roots. I don't know the back story on how he picked Carleton, but it is probably an interesting look into how parties operate. Carleton has always been center or a bit left of center. And both redistribution and population growth , including tons of newly printed civil servants sway the demographics towards the left more.

Also, no MP was removed. He stepped down. Big difference. If the party was going to kick out a solid MP, they wouldn't do it 6 months before his pension kicks in.
This is just part of the same political game being played since the Magna Carta. I doubt it significantly changes anyone's opinion of Poilievre. Lovers love him a bit more, and haters hate him a bit more too.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3912
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Just Not ready

Post by Meds »

JelloPuddingPop wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 10:59 pm
Mëds wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 9:31 pm
JelloPuddingPop wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 6:03 pm PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.

And people believe this fool cares about Government spending. Just look at his salary and expenses compared to his peers.
Yeah. I’m not a fan of the parachuting.

And the lack of connection…..lame…..none whatsoever outside of that he was born in Calgary, and U of C is his Alma mater. Weak.
Mid Mëds. Like saying Carney has a connection to the NWT.

Two decades away from AB. That's a life time for some voters.

I don't want my taxes to pay for some douche who his own riding decided against.
Connection is connection.

I was born in Maple Ridge and lived in the LML until I was 14. When people ask, that's always where I "grew up".

Connection is subjective.

I'd say a guy who was born and raised in Calgary, spent the first 24 years of his life there, probably still has connections and roots in the city.

You may not like it, but it's true. So continue to bitch and moan about the guy.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3912
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Just Not ready

Post by Meds »

Tciso wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 7:41 am
JelloPuddingPop wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 6:03 pm PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.
I am not a fan of parachute candidates either, but all major parties do it. I am more surprised that a 25 yr old kid would run in Carleton instead of a Western riding where it is way easier to win, and where he has deeper roots. I don't know the back story on how he picked Carleton, but it is probably an interesting look into how parties operate. Carleton has always been center or a bit left of center. And both redistribution and population growth , including tons of newly printed civil servants sway the demographics towards the left more.

Also, no MP was removed. He stepped down. Big difference. If the party was going to kick out a solid MP, they wouldn't do it 6 months before his pension kicks in.
This is just part of the same political game being played since the Magna Carta. I doubt it significantly changes anyone's opinion of Poilievre. Lovers love him a bit more, and haters hate him a bit more too.
Yeah. It's pretty rare for a guy to hold a riding for 20 years as a MP for a party that sits on the otherside of the typical political leaning. He didn't lose his riding because of the "fear of a Pierre-Trump bromance", he lost it because, as you say, newly printed civil servants relocating to the riding, some of whom probably would be part of the much needed fat trimming that Pollievre promised, got scared they would lose their comfortable government paycheques that they get every couple of weeks for doing next to nothing.....and the prospect of finding a similar level of employment is unpalatable because they are qualified for the type of employment that would pay them significantly less.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
User avatar
JelloPuddingPop
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1029
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:53 pm

Re: Just Not ready

Post by JelloPuddingPop »

Mëds wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 10:52 am
Tciso wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 7:41 am
JelloPuddingPop wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 6:03 pm PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.
I am not a fan of parachute candidates either, but all major parties do it. I am more surprised that a 25 yr old kid would run in Carleton instead of a Western riding where it is way easier to win, and where he has deeper roots. I don't know the back story on how he picked Carleton, but it is probably an interesting look into how parties operate. Carleton has always been center or a bit left of center. And both redistribution and population growth , including tons of newly printed civil servants sway the demographics towards the left more.

Also, no MP was removed. He stepped down. Big difference. If the party was going to kick out a solid MP, they wouldn't do it 6 months before his pension kicks in.
This is just part of the same political game being played since the Magna Carta. I doubt it significantly changes anyone's opinion of Poilievre. Lovers love him a bit more, and haters hate him a bit more too.
Yeah. It's pretty rare for a guy to hold a riding for 20 years as a MP for a party that sits on the otherside of the typical political leaning. He didn't lose his riding because of the "fear of a Pierre-Trump bromance", he lost it because, as you say, newly printed civil servants relocating to the riding, some of whom probably would be part of the much needed fat trimming that Pollievre promised, got scared they would lose their comfortable government paycheques that they get every couple of weeks for doing next to nothing.....and the prospect of finding a similar level of employment is unpalatable because they are qualified for the type of employment that would pay them significantly less.
I agree wholeheartedly, and it starts with PP. He should and was part of that fat trimming, voted out. He isn't qualified for anything else that would pay him what he makes in Gov. He should have stepped down, allowed the Cons to find a better leader. That's what leadership looks like. Not running in a riding 1/2 way across the country.

Guy costs us more in taxes than 20 of the other Gov. employees combined and has done FAR less than all of them.

How you can defend this reckless spending is mind boggling.
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3912
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Just Not ready

Post by Meds »

JelloPuddingPop wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 11:09 am How you can defend this reckless spending is mind boggling.
This from the guy that voted Liberal.....
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
Post Reply