Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Sat May 03, 2025 7:23 am I definitely would select the Voluptuous option in total recall

Moderator: Referees
Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Sat May 03, 2025 7:23 am I definitely would select the Voluptuous option in total recall
Poilievre's plan was for all new homes. Carney was just for 1st time buyers. Carney has a government bureaucratic program with another identifiable group to divide us. Poilievre has a tax rebate.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 12:41 pm
PP's plan (still listed on the Conservative website) - was to remove the GST on new homes as well.
One of the earliest decisions by Carney is to limit government spending growth to 2% annually. Lower than inflation. So far so good.
Helping 1st time buyers is a better point. People who already own, shouldn't need Gov. help to buy more (or another) new house. The idea is they already have the equity necessary. Try to help new buyers get into the market. Makes more sense to me.Tciso wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 11:56 amPoilievre's plan was for all new homes. Carney was just for 1st time buyers. Carney has a government bureaucratic program with another identifiable group to divide us. Poilievre has a tax rebate.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 12:41 pm
PP's plan (still listed on the Conservative website) - was to remove the GST on new homes as well.
One of the earliest decisions by Carney is to limit government spending growth to 2% annually. Lower than inflation. So far so good.
Also Carney's 2% totally depends on what it is 2% of. If he means this year's budget is 2% higher than last year, that is not in alignment with his stated budget deficits and spending commitments
Yeah. I’m not a fan of the parachuting.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 6:03 pm PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.
And people believe this fool cares about Government spending. Just look at his salary and expenses compared to his peers.
Mid Mëds. Like saying Carney has a connection to the NWT.Mëds wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 9:31 pmYeah. I’m not a fan of the parachuting.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 6:03 pm PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.
And people believe this fool cares about Government spending. Just look at his salary and expenses compared to his peers.
And the lack of connection…..lame…..none whatsoever outside of that he was born in Calgary, and U of C is his Alma mater. Weak.
I am not a fan of parachute candidates either, but all major parties do it. I am more surprised that a 25 yr old kid would run in Carleton instead of a Western riding where it is way easier to win, and where he has deeper roots. I don't know the back story on how he picked Carleton, but it is probably an interesting look into how parties operate. Carleton has always been center or a bit left of center. And both redistribution and population growth , including tons of newly printed civil servants sway the demographics towards the left more.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 6:03 pm PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.
Connection is connection.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 10:59 pmMid Mëds. Like saying Carney has a connection to the NWT.Mëds wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 9:31 pmYeah. I’m not a fan of the parachuting.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 6:03 pm PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.
And people believe this fool cares about Government spending. Just look at his salary and expenses compared to his peers.
And the lack of connection…..lame…..none whatsoever outside of that he was born in Calgary, and U of C is his Alma mater. Weak.
Two decades away from AB. That's a life time for some voters.
I don't want my taxes to pay for some douche who his own riding decided against.
Yeah. It's pretty rare for a guy to hold a riding for 20 years as a MP for a party that sits on the otherside of the typical political leaning. He didn't lose his riding because of the "fear of a Pierre-Trump bromance", he lost it because, as you say, newly printed civil servants relocating to the riding, some of whom probably would be part of the much needed fat trimming that Pollievre promised, got scared they would lose their comfortable government paycheques that they get every couple of weeks for doing next to nothing.....and the prospect of finding a similar level of employment is unpalatable because they are qualified for the type of employment that would pay them significantly less.Tciso wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 7:41 amI am not a fan of parachute candidates either, but all major parties do it. I am more surprised that a 25 yr old kid would run in Carleton instead of a Western riding where it is way easier to win, and where he has deeper roots. I don't know the back story on how he picked Carleton, but it is probably an interesting look into how parties operate. Carleton has always been center or a bit left of center. And both redistribution and population growth , including tons of newly printed civil servants sway the demographics towards the left more.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 6:03 pm PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.
Also, no MP was removed. He stepped down. Big difference. If the party was going to kick out a solid MP, they wouldn't do it 6 months before his pension kicks in.
This is just part of the same political game being played since the Magna Carta. I doubt it significantly changes anyone's opinion of Poilievre. Lovers love him a bit more, and haters hate him a bit more too.
I agree wholeheartedly, and it starts with PP. He should and was part of that fat trimming, voted out. He isn't qualified for anything else that would pay him what he makes in Gov. He should have stepped down, allowed the Cons to find a better leader. That's what leadership looks like. Not running in a riding 1/2 way across the country.Mëds wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 10:52 amYeah. It's pretty rare for a guy to hold a riding for 20 years as a MP for a party that sits on the otherside of the typical political leaning. He didn't lose his riding because of the "fear of a Pierre-Trump bromance", he lost it because, as you say, newly printed civil servants relocating to the riding, some of whom probably would be part of the much needed fat trimming that Pollievre promised, got scared they would lose their comfortable government paycheques that they get every couple of weeks for doing next to nothing.....and the prospect of finding a similar level of employment is unpalatable because they are qualified for the type of employment that would pay them significantly less.Tciso wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 7:41 amI am not a fan of parachute candidates either, but all major parties do it. I am more surprised that a 25 yr old kid would run in Carleton instead of a Western riding where it is way easier to win, and where he has deeper roots. I don't know the back story on how he picked Carleton, but it is probably an interesting look into how parties operate. Carleton has always been center or a bit left of center. And both redistribution and population growth , including tons of newly printed civil servants sway the demographics towards the left more.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 6:03 pm PP gets voted out by his own riding - and instead of accepting Canadians are tired of funding this guy's lifestyle, he decides to spend more taxpayers' money on a "bi-election" in a riding he doesn't have any connection to, removing a duly elected MP.
Also, no MP was removed. He stepped down. Big difference. If the party was going to kick out a solid MP, they wouldn't do it 6 months before his pension kicks in.
This is just part of the same political game being played since the Magna Carta. I doubt it significantly changes anyone's opinion of Poilievre. Lovers love him a bit more, and haters hate him a bit more too.
This from the guy that voted Liberal.....JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 11:09 am How you can defend this reckless spending is mind boggling.