US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond

The primary goal of this site is to provide mature, meaningful discussion about the Vancouver Canucks. However, we all need a break some time so this forum is basically for anything off-topic, off the wall, or to just get something off your chest! This forum is named after poster Creeper, who passed away in July of 2011 and was a long time member of the Canucks message board community.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15909
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: US Erection 12

Post by Strangelove »

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-rele ... nding-isis

“More than any major presidential nominee in modern history, Hillary Clinton is tied to brutal theocratic and Islamist regimes. Now we learn she has accepted money from a company linked to ISIS. All the while, she refuses to tell the truth about radical Islam's war against people of different beliefs, lifestyles and values.” – Stephen Miller, Senior Policy Advisor

The Clinton Foundation Has Received Between $50,001 And $100,000 From Lafarge.(“Contributor And Grantor Information,” Clinton Foundation, Accessed 8/1/16)

According To Le Monde, Lafarge “Entered Into Deals With Armed Groups In Syria, Including The Islamic State (IS) Group, In Order To Protect Its Business Interests In The Country.” “French cement maker Lafarge entered into deals with armed groups in Syria, including the Islamic State (IS) group, in order to protect its business interests in the country, French daily Le Monde reported Tuesday.” (“French Cement Maker Lafarge 'Made Deals With IS Group In Syria',” France 24, 6/22/16)

The Deal With ISIS Centers On A Cement Works Lafarge Purchased In Syria In 2007. “At the heart of the ‘murky deals’ alleged by Le Monde is a cement works that Lafarge bought in 2007 some 150 kilometres (95 miles) northeast of Aleppo. The Jalabiya cement works went into operation in 2010, a year before the start of Syria's ongoing civil war.” (“French Cement Maker Lafarge 'Made Deals With IS Group In Syria',” France 24, 6/22/16)

Lafarge Purchased Licenses And Paid Taxes To ISIS To Allow For Access To Its Syrian Cement Works And The “Free Circulation Of Its Goods.” “In one case Lafarge – seeking access to its factory for workers and supplies – sent a man named Ahmad Jaloudi on a mission ‘to get permission from IS group to let employees past checkpoints.’ … In another case a ‘pass stamped with an IS group stamp and endorsed by the (group's) finance chief in the Aleppo region’ proves the company had struck a deal with IS group to allow for free circulation of its goods, the newspaper reported. In order to keep making cement Lafarge bought licenses from and paid taxes to IS group middle-men and oil traders, the newspaper alleged.” (“French Cement Maker Lafarge 'Made Deals With IS Group In Syria',” France 24, 6/22/16)
http://www.thecanary.co/2016/07/29/pari ... y-clinton/

Lafarge also has close ties to Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Apart from being a regular donor to the Clinton Foundation, Clinton herself was a director of Lafarge in the early 1990s, and did legal work for the firm in the 1980s. During her connection to Lafarge, the firm was implicated in facilitating a CIA-backed covert arms export network to Saddam Hussein.

An investigative report by the French daily Le Monde revealed in June that the corporation, the world’s leader in construction materials, had paid taxes to Isis middlemen, as well as other armed groups in Syria, to protect its cement business operations in the country.

But the Le Monde story only covered a fraction of the revelations. Previous investigations by Zaman al-Wasl, an independent news outlet run by elements of the Syrian opposition, revealed that Lafarge had even regularly bought oil from Isis.

Al-Wasl’s original investigation, which Le Monde appears to have borrowed from considerably, was published in February, and based on internal documents and emails from the company. Al-Wasl reported that the CEO of Lafarge Cement Syria, Frederic Jolibois, had personally instructed his firm to make payments to Isis.

Emails discovered by Le Monde reveal that Lafarge – which merged with Swiss cement maker Holcim in 2015 – had made “arrangements […] with the jihadist group to continue production until September 19, 2014.”

Most of these emails seem to have been first obtained by Zaman al-Wasl. Lafarge’s Syria operations ended on that date when Isis took over the firm’s facility in Jalabiya.

Documents show that Lafarge’s Paris headquarters were fully aware of the business deal with Isis. The company even sent a representative into Isis territory “to get permission from Isis group to let employees past checkpoints,” reports Le Monde.

A “pass stamped with an Isis group stamp and endorsed by [Isis] finance chief in the Aleppo region” confirms Lafarge’s deal with Daesh to allow the free circulation of its goods.

In February 2015, Isis were driven out of the Jalabiya region by Kurdish forces.

Lafarge has declined to address the allegations, stating only that the firm’s highest priority was to protect the safety of its employees in Syria.

However, instead of ending its Syrian investments when the conflict began as most other international firms had done, which would have been the safest option, the firm struck a lucrative business deal with the jihadist terror group to maximise profits from its local cement operations.

Business partnerships of any kind with terror groups like Isis are criminal actions under international law, and subject to stringent US and EU sanctions.

But Lafarge leads quite a charmed existence.

Among its earliest benefactors was former First Lady and current presidential hopeful, Hillary Clinton.

From 1990 to 1992, Clinton served on Lafarge’s Board of Directors. Under her tenure, Lafarge’s Ohio subsidiary was caught burning hazardous waste to fuel cement plants. Clinton defended the decision at the time.

Then just before her husband, Bill Clinton, was elected president in 1992, Lafarge was fined $1.8 million by the Environmental Protection Agency for these pollution violations. Hillary Clinton had left the board of Lafarge in spring, just after her husband won the Democrat nomination. A year later, under Bill’s presidency, the Clinton administration reduced Lafarge’s EPA fine to less than $600,000.

In the late 1980s, according to an archived investigative report in the American Spectator, Hillary Clinton was connected to Lafarge when the firm was involved in facilitating CIA support for Saddam Hussein’s secret weapons programme.

The American Spectator report from November 1996 cited sources confirming that Hillary Clinton did legal work for Lafarge in the late 1980s before she became a director.

Lafarge remains close to the Clintons to this day.

In 2013, Lafarge’s Executive Vice President for Operations, Eric Olson, was a ‘featured attendee’ at the Clinton Global Initiative’s annual meeting.

The company is a regular donor to the Clinton Foundation – the firm’s up to $100,000 donation was listed in its annual donor list for 2015. Lafarge is also listed again as a donor to the Clinton Foundation for the first quarter of 2016.

Lafarge is a major beneficiary of disaster capitalism in Iraq, dominating a market where Iraq’s infrastructure remains in dire need of hundreds of billions of dollars in investment. The company describes itself as “one of the largest non-oil investors in Iraq.”

The firm is not just an economic juggernaut. Its murky history of intelligence ties, and significant political clout in France and the US – the countries leading the airstrikes against Isis in Syria – raise the question of whether Lafarge believes it can profit from terror without accountability.
Hillary is in bed with some very dirty people.

Hillary leading in the Presidential polls is a testament to "The Dumb American".
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15909
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: US Erection 12

Post by Strangelove »



"The father of a Benghazi victim destroys CNN's Costello's attempts to deflect for Hillary Clinton"

IMPO Hillary is a sociopath... most of the media know this and cover for her.

All is fair in love and war?
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 7720
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: US Erection 12

Post by Topper »

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... aises-tru/

“He’s onto something, because secretly everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up,” Mr. Eastwood, 86, told Esquire magazine in an interview published Wednesday. “That’s the kiss-ass generation we’re in right now. We’re really in a pussy generation. Everybody’s walking on eggshells.”

“I’d have to go for Trump,” he said. “‘Cause she’s declared that she’s gonna follow in Obama’s footsteps. There’s been just too much funny business on both sides of the aisle. She’s made a lot of dough out of being a politician. I gave up dough to be a politician. I’m sure that Ronald Reagan gave up dough to be a politician.”
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15909
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: US Erection 12

Post by Strangelove »

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fac ... -truthful/

As Wallace put it, “After a long investigation, FBI Director James Comey said none of those things that you told the American public were true.”

After Clinton denied that, Wallace played another video of an exchange between Comey and Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), chair of the House Select Committee on Benghazi:

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received. Was that true?
COMEY: That’s not true.
GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said, “I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material.” Was that true?
COMEY: There was classified material emailed.

Four Pinocchios

Image

(About our rating scale)
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... -comey-ca/

Clinton repeatedly said she did not have any classified information whatsoever in her email, marked or unmarked. After the FBI investigation, including the interview with Clinton, Comey said she unequivocally did.

We rate her claim Pants on Fire.

Image
That's the Washington Post and Politifact.com people. :mex:
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15909
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: US Erection 12

Post by Strangelove »



Animal Rights Activists protest a Hillary rally, Hillary responds with:

"Apparently these people are here to protest Trump because Trump and his kids have killed a lot of animals"

Image ... as per usual

... but listen to her laugh at the 14 second mark and compare to this:

____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15909
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: US Erection 12

Post by Strangelove »

Wasn't Hillary's better half impeached for basically lying to the American people?

Back when, Hillary said the accusation that Bill 'had sex with that woman' was a "vast right wing conspiracy". :lol:

We all know she's a 'lying politician'... but she's much worse than that: She's a pathological liar (just like her hubby).

A power-mad pathological liar supported by the corrupt American media and half the (brainwashed) Americans.

I can hardly wait until Wikileaks' October Surprise puts an end to this madness.

Image

Just want to take the time now to say that I'm enjoying this discussion very much...
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 7720
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: US Erection 12

Post by Topper »

Image
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
User avatar
2Fingers
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2156
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:47 am

Re: US Erection 12

Post by 2Fingers »

And Trump makes a good president why?

Every time he opens his mouth he puts someone or some race or some group down. He hasn't lied in politics because he has never been a politician. He is a complete ass who scares the shit out of me if he holds the keys to nuclear weapons.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15909
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: US Erection 12

Post by Strangelove »

Topper wrote:http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... aises-tru/

“He’s onto something, because secretly everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up,” Mr. Eastwood, 86, told Esquire magazine in an interview published Wednesday. “That’s the kiss-ass generation we’re in right now. We’re really in a pussy generation. Everybody’s walking on eggshells.”
Reefer2 wrote:And Trump makes a good president why?

Every time he opens his mouth he puts someone or some race or some group down. He hasn't lied in politics because he has never been a politician. He is a complete ass who scares the shit out of me if he holds the keys to nuclear weapons.
Yeah, Trump is the Dirty Harry of US politics. :blush:

Hillary has to ask herself just one question... "Do I feel lucky?"
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Mickey107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 4999
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:27 am
Location: Richmond, B.C.

Re: US Erection 12

Post by Mickey107 »

Reefer2 wrote:And Trump makes a good president why?

Every time he opens his mouth he puts someone or some race or some group down. He hasn't lied in politics because he has never been a politician. He is a complete ass who scares the shit out of me if he holds the keys to nuclear weapons.
Hillary's laundry keeps getting dirtier the harder they try and clean it.
That cold water cycle isn't working too well.
Nukes are not the biggest threat anymore.
More along the lines of who can bring down who's infrastructure first...
"evolution"
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15909
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16

Post by Strangelove »



Add them to the list: http://truthfeed.com/46-clinton-friends ... dead/8944/

DON'T VOTE FOR HILLARY, SHE'S KILLING EVERYBODY!

DON'T VOTE FOR HILLARY, SHE'S KILLING EVERYBODY!

DON'T VOTE FOR HILLARY, SHE'S KILLING EVERYBODY!
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Per
MVP
MVP
Posts: 4124
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:45 am
Location: Sweden

Re: US Erection 12

Post by Per »

griz wrote:
Why is he an idiot?
Hard to tell.

Maybe he was dropped on his head when he was a baby?
‘the smaller Aegean islands’ means any islands in the Aegean Sea except the islands of Crete and Evia.
User avatar
Per
MVP
MVP
Posts: 4124
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 7:45 am
Location: Sweden

Re: US Erection 12

Post by Per »

griz wrote:
Sorry for the delay RG, I'm here now.

From : http://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-and-t ... sm/5489890

NATO was initially imperialism’s counterweight to impede the growth of socialism around the world. After the Soviet Union fell, NATO evolved into an instrument of imperialist expansion... NATO has played a critical role in every US war since 1991.

From : http://www.progressive.org/why_nato_bad_for_world.html

NATO and the G8 have used their political and military power to impose their social and economic vision on the planet. Their economic agenda (neoliberalism) has tilted the social wealth of the planet toward the global 1 percent and put the interests of finance above that of social needs.

Withdrawing support for NATO seems anti-globalism to me. NATO was initially not what it has become. Are you saying that you support NATO, their current mode of operation or their ongoing involvement in highly controversial wars?

As for Trump's foreign policy issues, and his "wildly inaccurate (and often contradictory) statements during his campaign" can you elaborate?
NATO was formed as a partnership between the US and Canada and most Western European nations to put an end to Soviet expansion into Central Europe.

As a Swede, I've been perfectly happy with our neutral stance during the Cold War. I mean, everyone knew that if push came to shove, we would end up where we always have ended up, ie fighting Russia, so not on the Warsaw Pact side, but it was nice to play the part of the bridge builder in that era.

Then came Gorbachev, who started dismantling the Soviet Union, and Yeltsin, who put the final nail in that coffin, and for a period of time it seemed NATO was no longer serving any purpose. Things were looking up, the Russians had democracy, free press and embraced the market economy. The Cold War was over. Or so we thought.

Enter stage right: the second coming of Stalin, aka Putin.

At first this KGB coronel seemed willing to play along, but slowly things started to revert back to the bad old days. Under Yeltsin there were dozens of independent TV channels in Russia and hundreds of independent radio stations and newspapers. Under Putin this has stopped. All TV stations are now either state controlled or owned by oligarchs with close ties to Putin. There are no longer any independent radio stations and only one independent newspaper, Novaya Gazeta, which hardly anyone reads, and whose journalists often suffer tragic life ending accidents. :(

Putin has violently subdued uprisings in eg Chechenya. He has invaded parts of Georgia and the Ukraine, and even annected the Crimea peninsula, which is part of Ukraine, to Russia. To facilitate future interventions "to defend Russian minorities" he has offered any citizen of any country that used to be part of the Soviet Union or the Russian Empire the right to Russian citizenship. That includes all Finns. :wow:

The increasingly threatening behaviour of Putin has meant that there is a growing opinion in both Sweden and Finland for joining NATO. I've Always been against it, but Putin is beginning to convince me that maybe we should.

At that very Point, Trump starts blurting out that he doesn't Think the US necessarily should honour the treaty and intervene if a member is attacked. He is basically telling Putin to help himself to his smaller neighbours! :shock:

And at the same time he states that Putin will never invade the Ukraine. Newsflash! He already did! :roll:

But then, in recent years they say Trump has relied heavily on Russian money to keep his business afloat (between bankrupcies), and several of his advisors have ties to Putin, so I guess he's just trying to keep Ole Vlad happy. :drink:
‘the smaller Aegean islands’ means any islands in the Aegean Sea except the islands of Crete and Evia.
User avatar
5thhorseman
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2090
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:04 am

Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16

Post by 5thhorseman »

Thanks for the perspective Per!
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 15909
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Someday

Re: US Erection 12

Post by Strangelove »

Per wrote: NATO was formed as a partnership between the US and Canada and most Western European nations to put an end to Soviet expansion into Central Europe [post WWII].

… Then came Gorbachev, who started dismantling the Soviet Union, and Yeltsin, who put the final nail in that coffin, and for a period of time it seemed NATO was no longer serving any purpose.

The Cold War was over. Or so we thought.
Actually that was exactly the point in time that NATO began “serving a purpose”.

Purpose: Gobble up former Russian allies/former-USSR-states (politically)… move in troops + weapons

... all under the banner of "NATO".

Prior to that point, the West was either going to band together against any Russian invasion

… or it wasn’t. (severe doubts about the "NATO" covering, as I am sure you are aware, see: France)

Oh sure, in recent times (last 2 decades) they have banded together against oh-so-powerful foes in

Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, and Libya. :D

USSR during the Cold War?

Not so much.

Treaties made to be broken, note how USA dropped the USA/USSR ABM treaty as soon as they got the upper-hand.

(Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty)

(aka the Mutual Assured Destruction treaty)

With 30,000 Nato troops on her border + $200M-$1B “defence” systems in Poland + Romania

… Russia is experiencing her own Cuban Missile Crisis right about now.

(note, the range of these "defensive" missiles tends to double every few years)

WHO are the aggressors again?

In the name of stability is it time to back off and make amends with Yogi perhaps?
Per wrote: Enter stage right: the second coming of Stalin, aka Putin.
OMG this is the kind of guy who compares Trump to Hitler! :lol:
Per wrote: Putin has violently subdued uprisings in eg Chechenya.
Here in the West we call Putin’s enemies in Chechnya: “terrorists”. :hmmm:

Those who attack civilians = “terrorists”.
Per wrote: He has invaded parts of Georgia and the Ukraine, and even annected the Crimea peninsula, which is part of Ukraine, to Russia.
Correction: He has supported separatists in Georgia and Crimea.

Separatists who wanted to rejoin Russia.

You do realize Georgia and Crimea were Russian states for hundreds of years until recently right?
Per wrote: To facilitate future interventions "to defend Russian minorities" he has offered any citizen of any country that used to be part of the Soviet Union or the Russian Empire the right to Russian citizenship. That includes all Finns. :wow:
Well now, I’d say that’s mighty magnanimous of him! :thumbs:
Per wrote: The increasingly threatening behaviour of Putin has meant that there is a growing opinion in both Sweden and Finland for joining NATO. I've Always been against it, but Putin is beginning to convince me that maybe we should.
“NATO member nation's defense spending must amount to 2 percent of GDP”

“NATO members must buy their weapons primarily from American weapons corporations”

:drink:
Per wrote: At that very Point, Trump starts blurting out that he doesn't Think the US necessarily should honour the treaty and intervene if a member is attacked. He is basically telling Putin to help himself to his smaller neighbours! :shock:
Trump wants to make pals with Putin.

Might be a refreshing change from the decades-old US bipartisan “poke the bear” routine.
Per wrote: And at the same time he states that Putin will never invade the Ukraine. Newsflash! He already did! :roll:
Many folk (including most Crimeans) never saw themselves as part of the Ukraine.

It’s okay if you want to consider Crimea as part of the Ukraine (only 13 years total though!)

... but yeah, many of us see Crimea as belonging to Russia for 220 years... and counting. :)
Per wrote: But then, in recent years they say Trump has relied heavily on Russian money to keep his business afloat (between bankrupcies), and several of his advisors have ties to Putin, so I guess he's just trying to keep Ole Vlad happy. :drink:
Yup, Trump gets it! :mex:

Speaking of Trump, we should both try harder to stick to the subject at hand amirite?
____
Try to focus on someday.
Post Reply