BigTuna wrote:
And Kadri isn't elite, but he's a nice two-way centre who is a pest and would have gotten 6 million per + on the open market this summer with the season he's having.
Yeah cuz non-elite pests get handed 6 X $6M contracts based on 23-game sample sizes.
Your team should have better prospects because your team sucked balls for years. It has only been recently that the Canucks have declined because of the aging vets on the team. Right now your beloved Laughs are only a few points behind a team you mock.
You have come here so many times in the past to tell us how wonderful your team is only to watch them fall apart again and again. Good God man have you not learnt a thing or 2 and say little until they actually win something?
BigTuna wrote:
And Kadri isn't elite, but he's a nice two-way centre who is a pest and would have gotten 6 million per + on the open market this summer with the season he's having.
Yeah cuz non-elite pests get handed 6 X $6M contracts based on 23-game sample sizes.
BigTuna wrote:
And Kadri isn't elite, but he's a nice two-way centre who is a pest and would have gotten 6 million per + on the open market this summer with the season he's having.
Yeah cuz non-elite pests get handed 6 X $6M contracts based on 23-game sample sizes.
Andrew Ladd and Kyle Okposo were elite?
Those contracts weren't based on 23-game sample sizes.
BigTuna wrote:
And Kadri isn't elite, but he's a nice two-way centre who is a pest and would have gotten 6 million per + on the open market this summer with the season he's having.
Yeah cuz non-elite pests get handed 6 X $6M contracts based on 23-game sample sizes.
Andrew Ladd and Kyle Okposo were elite?
Those contracts weren't based on 23-game sample sizes.
Is any of this getting through?
hint: Kadri sucks
What 23 game sample size? He's been in the NHL 5 years. He was very good last season. You're acting like this is so out of character for him. Statistically it's not. And Ladd's production actually dipped the older he got. You want a fresh sample. Niot a guy who had a career year 4 years earlier.
Your team should have better prospects because your team sucked balls for years. It has only been recently that the Canucks have declined because of the aging vets on the team. Right now your beloved Laughs are only a few points behind a team you mock.
You have come here so many times in the past to tell us how wonderful your team is only to watch them fall apart again and again. Good God man have you not learnt a thing or 2 and say little until they actually win something?[/quote]
The funy thing is, teams like Winnipeg and Buffalo are considered "Years" ahead of the leaves, right? Why aren't they farther ahead then? The leaves started their rebuild 5 years after Edmonton and beat them bad this week.
