Re: LOL
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2020 5:23 pm
I still believe he got pushed off the roof. He didn’t fall. If he acts up like this in regular life, he was shoved.
Page 112 of 202
Re: LOL
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 8:24 am
Enough of Gomer’s gibberish cluttering up this thread.
https://hfboards.mandatory.com/posts/171631967/
This is a challenged little guy.
https://hfboards.mandatory.com/posts/171631967/
This is a challenged little guy.
Re: LOL
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 10:50 am
Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 8:24 am https://hfboards.mandatory.com/posts/171631967/
This is a challenged little guy.
Hmmm, interesting:
Question: Should the mods at a Canucks site perma-ban an admitted non-Canucker for doing nothing except slag the team.Hollywood Burrows wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 8:24 am I've given up following this team after 30+ years
I mean, I believe him when he says he used to be a Canuck fan
... but hasn't he since devolved into the very definition of a "troll"?
Re: LOL
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 11:02 am
Well. One would think so. The only possible explanation is the mods agree with that sentiment making Canucks HF fucked beyond recognition. But over here, Doc? We at the CC recognize the massive improvements instead of staying stuck on a narrative out of pure stubbornness and the lack of willingness to admit “I was wrong”. You’re now dealing with bruised egos making it even more bat shit crazier than it ever was over there.Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 10:50 am Question: Should the mods at a Canucks site perma-ban an admitted non-Canucker for doing nothing except slag the team.
Re: LOL
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 1:29 pm
The thing I don't understand is where this sense of entitlement to a model NHL franchise and anything less we won't support is coming from. The Canucks have never been a model NHL franchise, this idea of if they aren't perfect I'm not buying in seems strange to me. People that don't like Benning should try some Jack Gordon on for size.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 11:02 amWell. One would think so. The only possible explanation is the mods agree with that sentiment making Canucks HF fucked beyond recognition. But over here, Doc? We at the CC recognize the massive improvements instead of staying stuck on a narrative out of pure stubbornness and the lack of willingness to admit “I was wrong”. You’re now dealing with bruised egos making it even more bat shit crazier than it ever was over there.Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 10:50 am Question: Should the mods at a Canucks site perma-ban an admitted non-Canucker for doing nothing except slag the team.
Re: LOL
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:12 pm
What Meg said - you're either a fan or you wait to jump on the bandwagon. Or go cheer for some other team.
Hell - we survived Messier, we can get through a damn rebuild.
If you can't find things to like about this right now, then you're complete utter moron, or ...
Hell - we survived Messier, we can get through a damn rebuild.
If you can't find things to like about this right now, then you're complete utter moron, or ...Re: LOL
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 4:22 pm
Still Messier.
Re: LOL
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 6:10 pm
Re: LOL
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2020 5:34 pm
Bleach Clean doing Bleach Clean in the management thread.
I’m still not buying he’s Ronning’s Ghost. One poster was full of vitriol and caked with urine, the other was well spoken and made several good points. That was RG. Maybe he changed his persona so he didn’t get annihilated here.....maybe? The Bleach Clean Dude behaves like a spoiled teenager.
I’m still not buying he’s Ronning’s Ghost. One poster was full of vitriol and caked with urine, the other was well spoken and made several good points. That was RG. Maybe he changed his persona so he didn’t get annihilated here.....maybe? The Bleach Clean Dude behaves like a spoiled teenager.
Re: LOL
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:00 pm
https://hfboards.mandatory.com/members/ ... ean.40779/Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 5:34 pm Bleach Clean doing Bleach Clean in the management thread.
I’m still not buying he’s Ronning’s Ghost. One poster was full of vitriol and caked with urine, the other was well spoken and made several good points. That was RG. Maybe he changed his persona so he didn’t get annihilated here.....maybe? The Bleach Clean Dude behaves like a spoiled teenager.
"On Dec 28, 2019 at 6:08 PM the username was changed from Ronning On Empty to Bleach Clean."
Bleach Clean was Ronning On Empty.
Is Ronning’s Ghost even posting there anymore?
Re: LOL
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:49 pm
Yes. Bleach Clean was Ronning On Empty for a short time, maybe one season.Strangelove wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:00 pmhttps://hfboards.mandatory.com/members/ ... ean.40779/Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 5:34 pm Bleach Clean doing Bleach Clean in the management thread.
I’m still not buying he’s Ronning’s Ghost. One poster was full of vitriol and caked with urine, the other was well spoken and made several good points. That was RG. Maybe he changed his persona so he didn’t get annihilated here.....maybe? The Bleach Clean Dude behaves like a spoiled teenager.
"On Dec 28, 2019 at 6:08 PM the username was changed from Ronning On Empty to Bleach Clean."
Bleach Clean was Ronning On Empty.
Is Ronning’s Ghost even posting there anymore?
Funny, I remember that Curmudgeon guy asking Bleach to delete his account there. He was a very hockey knowledgeable fellow at one of the forums I used to frequent, forget which one now.
Re: LOL
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2020 11:14 am
https://hfboards.mandatory.com/posts/171802190/
What an absolutely terrible post. These mouth breathers believe this drivel. It’s Elmer’s fault for Juolevi, but Brackett is responsible for Hughes and Petey. Based on what the neckbeard hack of the month at Canucks Army says.
Make no mistake Juolevi was an awful pick and I took a bat to Elmer for that blunder for years. But Hughes and Petey are game changers. So of course he must have had nothing to do with those picks right...? The false narratives and blatant lies these meat puppets toss around are asinine.
The gift that keeps on giving
What an absolutely terrible post. These mouth breathers believe this drivel. It’s Elmer’s fault for Juolevi, but Brackett is responsible for Hughes and Petey. Based on what the neckbeard hack of the month at Canucks Army says.
Make no mistake Juolevi was an awful pick and I took a bat to Elmer for that blunder for years. But Hughes and Petey are game changers. So of course he must have had nothing to do with those picks right...? The false narratives and blatant lies these meat puppets toss around are asinine.
The gift that keeps on giving
Re: LOL
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2020 1:00 pm
... a Rangers fan? That's what you were gonna say, isn't it Corn..... I can't believe you would even contemplate such language.Cornuck wrote: ↑Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:12 pm What Meg said - you're either a fan or you wait to jump on the bandwagon. Or go cheer for some other team.
Hell - we survived Messier, we can get through a damn rebuild.
Re: LOL
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2020 1:02 pm
Honestly Blobby, the argument is sounding pretty similar to something that the Chef would have shotgunned all over these here boards comparing Gillis and Benning.Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Tue Mar 31, 2020 11:14 am https://hfboards.mandatory.com/posts/171802190/
What an absolutely terrible post. These mouth breathers believe this drivel. It’s Elmer’s fault for Juolevi, but Brackett is responsible for Hughes and Petey. Based on what the neckbeard hack of the month at Canucks Army says.
Make no mistake Juolevi was an awful pick and I took a bat to Elmer for that blunder for years. But Hughes and Petey are game changers. So of course he must have had nothing to do with those picks right...? The false narratives and blatant lies these meat puppets toss around are asinine.
The gift that keeps on giving