Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 4:16 pm
Like just once to see Subban try wing
They get bonus genetics points.Topper wrote:Subban and Cassels as solid NHLers is a stretch
Page 101 of 145
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 4:16 pm
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 4:47 pm
To say nothing of Pedan , Gaunce and Granlund.Topper wrote:Subban and Cassels as solid NHLers is a stretch
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 4:50 pm
Better than Calgary...Blob Mckenzie wrote:To say nothing of Pedan , Gaunce and Granlund.Topper wrote:Subban and Cassels as solid NHLers is a stretch
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 11:51 pm
Just because he's black doesn't mean he likes chicken.micky107 wrote:Like just once to see Subban try wing
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:08 am
Flames called up Shink yesterday. I hope we were wrong and Lindenning was right.
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:02 am
This is the day I dreadedMr.Miyagi wrote:Flames called up Shink yesterday. I hope we were wrong and Lindenning was right.
hope I'm wrong...
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:59 am
Small, good luck shrinkaruk....trampled by tram....micky107 wrote:This is the day I dreadedMr.Miyagi wrote:Flames called up Shink yesterday. I hope we were wrong and Lindenning was right.
hope I'm wrong...
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:44 am
Ya, that's great but that aint who we got for him.rats19 wrote:Small, good luck shrinkaruk....trampled by tram....micky107 wrote:This is the day I dreadedMr.Miyagi wrote:Flames called up Shink yesterday. I hope we were wrong and Lindenning was right.
hope I'm wrong...
good luck anyways
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:04 am
My point wasn't tit for tat but was size related only and tryamkin pummelling him is a small dream I had but thanks for misinterpreting...micky107 wrote:Ya, that's great but that aint who we got for him.rats19 wrote:Small, good luck shrinkaruk....trampled by tram....micky107 wrote:This is the day I dreadedMr.Miyagi wrote:Flames called up Shink yesterday. I hope we were wrong and Lindenning was right.
hope I'm wrong...
good luck anyways
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:12 am
I know! Was just bein a shit.
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:19 am
Sorry rats
I'm just still pissed about that deal
don't see much in Granlund
I'm just still pissed about that deal
don't see much in Granlund
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:59 am
Um, excuse me...but perhaps the 'point' is that Granlund would not be pummelled by The Iron Tree if he played for Calgary still.micky107 wrote:Sorry rats
I'm just still pissed about that deal
don't see much in Granlund
YOUR Vancouver Canucks would appreciate a little more Hockey IQ effort rather than...typing with your 'fists'
Thank You
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:10 am
That may be Mick but you know.....fuck him!micky107 wrote:Sorry rats
I'm just still pissed about that deal
don't see much in Granlund
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:35 am
What, like you? Um, think I'll take a pass on that one.Arachnid wrote:Um, excuse me...but perhaps the 'point' is that Granlund would not be pummelled by The Iron Tree if he played for Calgary still.micky107 wrote:Sorry rats
I'm just still pissed about that deal
don't see much in Granlund
YOUR Vancouver Canucks would appreciate a little more Hockey IQ effort rather than...typing with your 'fists'
Thank You
Hockey IQ?
I think The Iron Tree is here to be a presence with his size, long reach, strength, etc.
Not to pummel, pummel, pummel/ suspension, suspension, suspension.