Page 2 of 4
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 4:13 pm
by donlever
Unless they sit his 4.25 sheets on the bench and let Merilainen run with it (these new fucking guys acquisition after all)...
...again....we are presuming they are going to let him operate at sub .800 save %....
...not so sure about that either.
But sure...yeah..Lankinen was a genius signing.
(...I get the facetious part RG.....just yanking your chain as well as commenting that I, for one, do not believe for a minute that this group has the appetite to watch this for the required time to properly fix this shit......as I posted last year more than once....
the Canucks are in the midst of regarding the realities of a diminishing next Gen fan base....the A's may be lousy at ownership (allegedly) but big business and making money they are not....
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 5:04 pm
by Carl Yagro
Fantastic topic, Cuz.
Statiscally, the data puts the goaltending re-signings, especially Lanker's as the worst, most crippling and unnecessary long-term contracts considering the current state of the team.
But in fact, it could actually be genius as Lanky's continuing shit-the-bed performances is exactly what a rebuilding team needs and keeps the owner's delusions in check.
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 6:13 pm
by Madcombinepilot
While I can understand the 'Tankists' love them some Lankinen (I mean, the guy is stopping 2 out of 3 pucks this year in every game he has played - that SCREAMS rebuild!), I gotta question what does that do for the confidence/culture of this team. Its such a thin line to walk between learning systems and rebuilding culture to having that one guy who keeps losing you games because he could not stop a beachball from center ice. I have been on teams where there is an obvious weaker than the lowest of the average, and it does not make for a good dressing room. And I can safely say, we have all seen the effects of a bad dressing room..
It would be better to have a rookie struggle and lose while learning, than a supposed veteran backup who just sucks donkey balls.
Lank the Tank gotta go. They gotta figure that out.
That, and get someone who actually brings something to the table over Bains. Fuck, is he useless too.
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 7:04 pm
by donlever
Yeah...i don't get it either MCP.
We blow....play the fuck out of Raty....see if this is it or is there more.
These FUCKING guys....its literally painful.
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 7:17 pm
by theman
Wait, are we talking about the old guys or new guys now?
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 7:22 pm
by donlever
Feels the same sometimes.
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 8:03 pm
by Madcombinepilot
Only thing I can figure over not playing Raty, is that Bains is bringing an intangible.. but what that is, I have no Idea.
And for clarification, Bains is useless in the role he has been given here. He is an AHL scorer, top line AHL guy, who is asked to play 4th line with the big club. His game doesn't translate for that. (His game doesn't translate for top 6 NHL either - that's been tried enough). The role he is asked to play is that of a 4th line grinder. He is too slow, doesn't track the game fast enough on D, doesn't bring the energy with hits or fights or forechecks.. offense goes to die on his stick.. He does nothing for everything you ask your bottom 6 energy guys to do.
Raty at least wins face offs.
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 8:05 pm
by Cousin Strawberry
It was pretty ironic that when Leevu lost the blade they were tied 1-1 and holding their own... relatively speaking...then in pops the picket fence and with him comes the loss.
Who registered the loss today?
(Hint - according to the score Tanky is on record with the loss lol)
The kid is obviously the best option for right now. Time to send KL upstairs for a few and bring up the dude with the eyes too far apart
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 8:09 pm
by Madcombinepilot
Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2026 8:05 pm
It was pretty ironic that when Leevu lost the blade they were tied 1-1 and holding their own... relatively speaking...then in pops the picket fence and with him comes the loss.
Who registered the loss today?
(Hint - according to the score Tanky is on record with the loss lol)
The kid is obviously the best option for right now. Time to send KL upstairs for a few and bring up the dude with the eyes too far apart
Yup.
Lanks has until the team goes back west to figure out his shit.
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 8:35 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
Great topic Cuz, but I can't really keep it to five.
My list:
the Demko contract (the sheer idiocy)
the Miller/Horvat scenario
the Boeser contract
Peter's deal
Podkolzin for a fourth
the Lankinen contract
the Elias Lindholm acquisition
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 8:58 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2026 8:03 pm
Only thing I can figure over not playing Raty, is that Bains is bringing an intangible.. but what that is, I have no Idea.
And for clarification, Bains is useless in the role he has been given here. He is an AHL scorer, top line AHL guy, who is asked to play 4th line with the big club. His game doesn't translate for that. (His game doesn't translate for top 6 NHL either - that's been tried enough). The role he is asked to play is that of a 4th line grinder. He is too slow, doesn't track the game fast enough on D, doesn't bring the energy with hits or fights or forechecks.. offense goes to die on his stick.. He does nothing for everything you ask your bottom 6 energy guys to do.
Raty at least wins face offs.
The intangible Bains is bringing is as a cult hero to a segment of the fan base. It only makes sense as a marketing gimmick, and that's pathetic.
As you said, he checks zero boxes as a fourth line winger. Zero.
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 10:35 pm
by donlever
Allowing Zadorov to walk.
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2026 11:25 pm
by Carl Yagro
I thought you were a big proponent of DEI, Megs?
Frank: "Hey, JR. There's a big South Asian fanbase we want to market to. We should do something in the area of Diwali, something for those fans to cheer for."
JR: "Ok, boss. I'll see what I can do." (Proceeds to get his Swedish henchman to sign and promote a cult hero from the Whalley area...)
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2026 12:13 am
by Picker of Cherries
1. The ones that seemed most idiotic to me was signing Lankinen and trading Silovs.
2. Then the biggest mistake was Miller over Horvat.
3. Not re-signing Cole which killed their PK.
They still suck on the PK and why they should trade for Edvinsson now.
Shenn is their only half decent PK defencemen, and he is slowing down.
Maybe D-Petey grows into the role?
Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2026 1:15 am
by Hockey Widow
So many mistakes with the past two regimes. The list is endless.
But this coach we have now! Wanna love the guy but he is rewarding Bains for what he did for him in Abbotsford. We need to send him down and hope someone claim him.
Raty needs to play.
I think I heard Manny say that Bains is showing the guys what type of hockey Manny expects and at practice he leads the charge in drills. So he has familiarity with Manny and that has bought him his ticket. But sooner or later Manny has to cut the cord.