The AI thread

The primary goal of this site is to provide mature, meaningful discussion about the Vancouver Canucks. However, we all need a break some time so this forum is basically for anything off-topic, off the wall, or to just get something off your chest! This forum is named after poster Creeper, who passed away in July of 2011 and was a long time member of the Canucks message board community.

Moderators: donlever, Referees

User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 8122
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: The AI thread

Post by Topper »

A client contracted an AI company to plan drill holes for them. They have 10 permitted drill site and a very deep geophysical target that depending on the black box used to model the geophysics, the anomaly shifts, in some cases a few 100 metres, in 3D space. The contractor used AI to calculate 100's of drill orientations (azimuth, dip, depth) from the permitted drill sites and calculate the odds of hitting the moving target from the various gephysical interpretations. Azimuth is compass direction, dip is angle down (0 dip is horizontal, -90 dip is vertical). They produced a list of holes with azimuth, dip and depth and ranked them based on odds of hitting a geophysical target, as well as the minimal depth that they may intersect that target. The computers ran for a couple of days doing the exercise.

The impracticality of their modelling was they did not account for hole deviation with drilling. Holes will naturally flatten and swing to the right, more so the shallower the dip of the hole. A vertical hole will deviate the least.The amount a hole deviates will vary will rock conditions and how hard the drillers push on the bit. On a 2000 metre deep hole, the bottom of the hole may end up over a 100 metres from where you intended it to be.

One project I managed we were drilling 500 metre deep holes and after three holes I learned that starting the hole with seven degrees less azimuth

I've done similar exercises by hand with maps on a light table or with loading models into 3D GIS software and looking at different scenarios while spinning the 3D model.

If the holes were deeper, they could use wedges and directional drilling to control the hole direction.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
User avatar
Cookie La Rue
MVP
MVP
Posts: 330
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: 50° 10' North / 8° 34' East

Re: The AI thread

Post by Cookie La Rue »

:lol: yeah it's all 'bout holes and ai is for the A.
"Every dog has its day." - CC Hockey Pool Champion 2004 & 2013 'Moves like Lenarduzzi'
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 5619
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: The AI thread

Post by Meds »

Topper wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2026 6:48 am The impracticality of their modelling was they did not account for hole deviation with drilling. Holes will naturally flatten and swing to the right, more so the shallower the dip of the hole.
Interesting. Why causes the rightward deviation as opposed to the opposite?
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 8122
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: The AI thread

Post by Topper »

Mëds wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2026 9:54 am
Topper wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2026 6:48 am The impracticality of their modelling was they did not account for hole deviation with drilling. Holes will naturally flatten and swing to the right, more so the shallower the dip of the hole.
Interesting. Why causes the rightward deviation as opposed to the opposite?
torque, drill rods spin clockwise
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
Post Reply