I appreciate his honesty about not mourning Kirk's death. But, some of his other inferences rub me wrong.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Sep 14, 2025 5:24 pmWhat exactly did you not like what he said about Kirk’s death?Tciso wrote: ↑Sun Sep 14, 2025 5:13 pmHe claims to be a self proclaimed critic of "Western so called civilization", and an inferred enemy of Charlie Kirk. I didn't hear a single thing to love from this manChef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:41 pm Absolutely love this
https://youtu.be/XMFwj30seEg?si=8O4MP7smzrnB-al6
Implying the "far right" had him killed as an expendable pawn.
Calling Kirk anti immigrant (he wa anti illegal immigrant. Big difference)
Stating the American system created both Charlie and his killer, without identifying what it is in the system.
He compares Kirk to the cheering squad during a battle, with an analogy of the Muslims fighting the non-believers. Kirk was anti-violence, and,his analogy infers that the war between Muslims and the West had already started, and he supports the continuation until the west is destroyed.
He claims we are in the late stages of failed capitalism in a dying empire, and implies that is the reason Charlie got shot, while completely discounting extremism.
His entire undertone is very anti-christian, and anti-democracy, while being very pro Muslim and as he offers no solutions, he leaves a strong impression that the solution is yet another Muslim theocratic dictatorship.
I see nothing to love.