with the cap skyrocketing, the league will need a couple summers of overspending to need relief again..
Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas
Moderators: donlever, Referees
- Madcombinepilot
- MVP

- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:54 am
- Location: Saskatoon, Sk.
Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas
The 'Chain of Command' is the chain I am going to beat you with until you understand I am in charge.
- Picker of Cherries
- CC 1st Team All-Star
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2023 1:11 pm
Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas
Surprisingly, no waiver claims. I figured they could send down Lekkerimaki without waivers and give one of the possible waiver claims a look for a couple months. Well, their chances of getting DuPont remain the same…nil…since they always lose the lottery no matter if they finish 32nd.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Mon Sep 28, 2026 10:08 amDupont will not slip to 3rd OA pick..Picker of Cherries wrote: ↑Sun Sep 27, 2026 6:25 amI don’t know what else they could possibly find in the bowels besides gold, bronze or tin?
“Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room.”
- President Merkin Muffley
- President Merkin Muffley
- 2Fingers
- MVP

- Posts: 2571
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:47 am
Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas
I read somewhere, I think the Athletic, that the Canucks wants to build a team that has integrity and loyalty. So if they want the players to show this then management needs to show it as well. Unless a waiver is really that good why rock the boat, stay with the players they have and start to build a team players feel they belong.
- Lancer
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:41 am
- Location: Kingston, Ontario
Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas
If they stick to that, it would be commendable. A good move toward the culture they want to build. Not sure how tenable that approach will be long term, but it's worth pursuing.2Fingers wrote: ↑Mon Sep 28, 2026 2:27 pm I read somewhere, I think the Athletic, that the Canucks wants to build a team that has integrity and loyalty. So if they want the players to show this then management needs to show it as well. Unless a waiver is really that good why rock the boat, stay with the players they have and start to build a team players feel they belong.
Love the Sport. Love the Team.
Hate the League.
Hate the League.
- Madcombinepilot
- MVP

- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:54 am
- Location: Saskatoon, Sk.
Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas
But is that not kinda what got this team into the rut to begin with?? Not trading the Sedins, Waitinmg too long on Burrows, etc, etc..Lancer wrote: ↑Mon Sep 28, 2026 3:53 pmIf they stick to that, it would be commendable. A good move toward the culture they want to build. Not sure how tenable that approach will be long term, but it's worth pursuing.2Fingers wrote: ↑Mon Sep 28, 2026 2:27 pm I read somewhere, I think the Athletic, that the Canucks wants to build a team that has integrity and loyalty. So if they want the players to show this then management needs to show it as well. Unless a waiver is really that good why rock the boat, stay with the players they have and start to build a team players feel they belong.
At the time the most loved and tenured Canuck was Linden, and they sent him for what ended up being The twins and Bertuzzi. its fine to have loyalty to one, perhaps 2 players, but the teams that hung onto 'That Guy' are all suffering on the transition (Yzerman, Sedins, Ovi, Etc -- unless the draft fix is in -Sid)).. Star players get traded/moved Period. Just have to do it at the right time for the right trade. (Oilers traded Great, won a cup. Chicago traded Seabrook and the glue guys if the core, Tampa moved on from Stammer, Etc, etc)
I know some people will now research the hell out of that to carve it, but I did this off the top of my head. There are WAY more examples of moving big names and keeping the window open than hanging onto beloved franchise guys.
I guess I am saying There is a difference between moving a depth guy (signed in offseason or grabbed off waivers) than a core guy.
SO, if you grab a non core guy off waivers or sign a guy (sprong) and move them for an asset, good management.
But right now, this team has no core guys.
The 'Chain of Command' is the chain I am going to beat you with until you understand I am in charge.
- Picker of Cherries
- CC 1st Team All-Star
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2023 1:11 pm
Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas
Even if they fear Bains, Sasson and Breezer would get claimed on waivers (which they probably wouldn’t), they have Mancini and Lekkerimaki who do not require waivers. They should not have loyalty to those two as they haven’t shown consistent NHL level play, and can still improve playing in Abby. Grabbing a couple depth players to give a chance or to later flip for a pick when another team runs into injury troubles, maybe with retention, seems logical. When in a rebuild, winning is not important and collecting picks and young potential is, not taking a flyer from the waiver wire seems like a missed opportunity. The season is long, and lots of injuries happen, trades will happen, which will all provide deserving Abby players opportunities.
“Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room.”
- President Merkin Muffley
- President Merkin Muffley
- Cousin Strawberry
- MVP

- Posts: 10031
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas
Apparently there are expected to be some juicier assets available shortly after the season gets under way and that's what is being speculated they're doing. One of the Poitras boys in Washington is a target
If you need air...call it in
- Megaterio Llamas
- MVP

- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am
Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas
I thank that's Poitras, a small young right shooting center in Boston Cuz. Those big Belarussian Protas brothers in Washington won't be anywhere near waivers.Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Mon Sep 28, 2026 7:37 pm Apparently there are expected to be some juicier assets available shortly after the season gets under way and that's what is being speculated they're doing. One of the Poitras boys in Washington is a target
el rey del mambo
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3799
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas
I think the calculation is, and should be, is the player we claim on waivers better than and does he provide more of what we are looking for than any one player we would need to waive. Tolipilo is the perfect example. They clearly do not see him as NHL backup player and the calculation was the guy they got, in their opinion, exceeds Tolipilo’s projection.
The same analysis regarding Sasson, Bains, Brisbois and Raty needs to be made. I don’t think they would hesitate plucking someone and waiving one of those guys if a player was waived who they felt was a better fit. True those four are a dime a dozen type player but that’s not the point.
The same analysis regarding Sasson, Bains, Brisbois and Raty needs to be made. I don’t think they would hesitate plucking someone and waiving one of those guys if a player was waived who they felt was a better fit. True those four are a dime a dozen type player but that’s not the point.
The only HW the Canucks need
