GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
Moderator: Referees
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 19129
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
Demko was the playoff Demko for those two games. If the Sens score 1-2 more in the first period it is an entirely different game. If they take that message to heart and come out strong again in the first then Holtby needs to be up to task. Conversely the Canucks should be thinking about getting their collective shit together from the opening puck drop.
If Holtby is up to task and if the Canucks start strong then I think they can take this game by another lopsided score. Nothing about Ottawa goaltending nor defence has been impressive.
Lets see if Doc can make it 3 in a row.
If Holtby is up to task and if the Canucks start strong then I think they can take this game by another lopsided score. Nothing about Ottawa goaltending nor defence has been impressive.
Lets see if Doc can make it 3 in a row.
The only HW the Canucks need
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
I will say 4 - 1 for Canucks tonight with another big game from Lotto line.
I assume Holtby is starting tonight and we will see some more rotation on D.
I assume Holtby is starting tonight and we will see some more rotation on D.
- 5thhorseman
- MVP
- Posts: 5449
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:04 am
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
The calibre of play in the last two games has actually been horrible for both teams, at least on the defensive side. Sloppy play and turnovers galore. If this keeps up we'll be back to losing games with regularity against WPG, MTL, and CGY.
That said, the boys really SHOULD win this one on the basis of offence. Another lopsided score: 5-2 Nucks.
That said, the boys really SHOULD win this one on the basis of offence. Another lopsided score: 5-2 Nucks.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 31130
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
This sloppy play might work against Edmonton or Ottawa but the Canucks will be exposed if they don’t clean up the turnovers between the blue lines, by Toronto, Calgary, Winnipeg, Montreal.
Team looks a bit better but still nowhere near good enough to hang with the big boys unless they tighten up big time.
Team looks a bit better but still nowhere near good enough to hang with the big boys unless they tighten up big time.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
Doc cleaning rifle with a naked Charlton while calling other loony.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
- Cousin Strawberry
- MVP
- Posts: 26187
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
Its pretty bad eh. I cant recall a D group commit so many unforced turnovers like this. It has to be the #1 issue right now for the teamDoyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Thu Jan 28, 2021 10:06 am This sloppy play might work against Edmonton or Ottawa but the Canucks will be exposed if they don’t clean up the turnovers between the blue lines, by Toronto, Calgary, Winnipeg, Montreal.
Team looks a bit better but still nowhere near good enough to hang with the big boys unless they tighten up big time.
If you need air...call it in
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
All the scoring we've been doing and ole Jake hasn't figured in much. Fine to say "but he's playing in the bottom six", but there are Mottes and Sutters flashing red lights so WTF? A tight leash or doesn't care much. Still a bit puzzled as to what Green would like to see from him, other than a good attitude. Fine to say consistency, but that is vague.
He is bright enough to realize what this year means to him I hope. After all this effort gone into a player, would stink to just lose him in the expansion draft.
He is bright enough to realize what this year means to him I hope. After all this effort gone into a player, would stink to just lose him in the expansion draft.
"evolution"
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
Judging by morning skate, Holtby is starting and don't be surprised if Gaudette is in for Virtanen.
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
LOL, I just saw that. Well hell, I thought Jake he'd been pretty invisible.
"evolution"
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
This is satisfactory...
Silence intelligence so stupid isn’t offended….
- 5thhorseman
- MVP
- Posts: 5449
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:04 am
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
Yep. Gaudette still has upside. Virtanen not so much. Losing him to Seattle would also be satisfactory.
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
rumour is we are looking for a D man so I am hoping Virts + could bring back a quality D.5thhorseman wrote: ↑Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:04 pmYep. Gaudette still has upside. Virtanen not so much. Losing him to Seattle would also be satisfactory.
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
For the first time ever I’m agreeing with getting Jake gone for a piece we needtheman wrote: ↑Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:05 pmrumour is we are looking for a D man so I am hoping Virts + could bring back a quality D.5thhorseman wrote: ↑Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:04 pmYep. Gaudette still has upside. Virtanen not so much. Losing him to Seattle would also be satisfactory.
Silence intelligence so stupid isn’t offended….
- Cousin Strawberry
- MVP
- Posts: 26187
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
Quality might be a stretch there unless the + is significant, maybe another 5-6 D-man which isn't moving any needles.
If you need air...call it in
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 31130
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: GDT: Sens @ Canucks – Jan 28,2021 – 7:00 – SN
Gaudette and Virtanen are what three months apart? But one has upside and the other doesn’t. Makes sense
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”