ESQ wrote:Imagine getting suspended without pay in your job for being accused of a crime, while you are still presumed innocent under the Constitution. Then imagine being suspended without even facing a criminal charge, and without any opportunity to prove your innocence, for months while the prosecutor dithers over an extremely weak case.
I have so many differing thoughts on this whole thing. Does anyone know off hand if this is typical for the league to suspend a player 1) while under investigation and/or 2) once charges are laid.
I get once there is a conviction. Was that AV's goalie suspended during the investigation? Can't remember and did that count on the cap?
There is no question that the league is trying to be politically correct here. Is it an overreaction on the eve of the Rice incident or is it fair? I take violence against women very seriously but I also believe in the notion of innocent until proven guilty. Sure he is getting paid so his livelihood is intack but his career is takng a hit. Is that fair? A tough question but domestic violence is a harsh issue. For him though, he can still play in the KHL and make millions.