You always know just what to sayHockey Widow wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:59 pm We have to give Eriksson his due. He has united this board!
Weeeeeee tomorrow isn't it?
Moderator: Referees
You always know just what to sayHockey Widow wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:59 pm We have to give Eriksson his due. He has united this board!
You think it's perfectly sane for folks to want a hockey player on one's team solely because they "love his flow"?Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:10 pmWho said anything about anyone being wacky? There you go putting words into people's posts again!Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:08 pmYou want Lucic and you think other folks are wacky...Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:06 pmLOL!Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:59 pm We have to give Eriksson his due. He has united this board!
I hear that Doc and the Dude secretly still want to keep him.....they love his flow.
Well some of your posts over the past few days seem to suggest you're in favour of a Loui for Lucic swap.
EH?
Nope.Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:05 pmI have no idea. Did it?
Or other posters dont like him cuz his pipe might taste like smegma?Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:14 pm
You think it's perfectly sane for folks to want a hockey player on one's team solely because they "love his flow"?
*backs away slowly*
I've always said "assholes who can play".SKYO wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:18 pm I remember it like it was yesterday when SL et al wanted some assholes on the team.
http://canuckscorner.com/forums/viewtop ... es#p283013
http://canuckscorner.com/forums/viewtop ... es#p290637
We finally can get ONE, and it's nope! - keep mr invisible Eriksson - where some games you're like "is Loui even playing?"
This didn’t get enough loveBlob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:57 pmNo shit. The guy has been an unmitigated disaster here.
His play is uglier than Rocky Dennis flipping out on shrooms wearing a prom dress
Well you love it and that's the main thing right?
Amen.Uncle dans leg wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:38 pm I lived in coilerland the past few years and watched my share of Lucic. Yeah no thanks. The guy can barely skate and never would be a factor on anything other than scrums. Whats the point? Teach other teams a lesson? Ha! Hes gassed by the whistle and just stands there sucking wind 99% of the time.
The best scenario is Loui gone from the books without having to add to the deal. Period.
Oh I see how it is. I have to read between the lines and know when you're being facetious, but you don't have to going the other way?Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:14 pmYou think it's perfectly sane for folks to want a hockey player on one's team solely because they "love his flow"?Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:10 pmWho said anything about anyone being wacky? There you go putting words into people's posts again!Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:08 pmYou want Lucic and you think other folks are wacky...Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:06 pmLOL!Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:59 pm We have to give Eriksson his due. He has united this board!
I hear that Doc and the Dude secretly still want to keep him.....they love his flow.
*backs away slowly*
I would be in favour of it, but only if the alternative is keeping Loui here. If Eriksson can be moved for a player as serviceable as Looch who is either cheaper or shorter term, then I'd be in favour of that.Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:14 pmWell some of your posts over the past few days seem to suggest you're in favour of a Loui for Lucic swap.
Or maybe you should answer your own questions:
EH?
Would a James Neal for Loui Eriksson swap be beneficial to both the Canucks and Flames? @Kent_Wilson
takes a look.
https://theathletic.com/1017634/2019/06 ... the-flames
/
(paywall)
Vancouver Canucks general manager Jim Benning might trade forward Loui Eriksson after the 33-year-old said he and Canucks coach Travis Green "don't really get on 100 percent."
"I am going to talk to Loui this week and get his thoughts on everything and why he made the comment he did, but (a trade) could be something that's real," Benning said, according to Kevin Woodley of NHL.com.
Eriksson, who has three years left on a six-year, $36-million contract, made the comments to Swedish website HockeySverige.se while playing for Sweden at the 2019 IIHF World Championship.
https://www.thescore.com/nhl/news/1784308
Yes because frankly you suck at being facetious.Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:58 pmOh I see how it is. I have to read between the lines and know when you're being facetious, but you don't have to going the other way?Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:14 pmYou think it's perfectly sane for folks to want a hockey player on one's team solely because they "love his flow"?Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:10 pmWho said anything about anyone being wacky? There you go putting words into people's posts again!Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:08 pmYou want Lucic and you think other folks are wacky...Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:06 pmLOL!Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:59 pm We have to give Eriksson his due. He has united this board!
I hear that Doc and the Dude secretly still want to keep him.....they love his flow.
*backs away slowly*
AH, so I wasn't "putting words into people's posts"!Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:58 pmI would be in favour of it, but only if the alternative is keeping Loui here. If Eriksson can be moved for a player as serviceable as Looch who is either cheaper or shorter term, then I'd be in favour of that.Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:14 pmWell some of your posts over the past few days seem to suggest you're in favour of a Loui for Lucic swap.
Or maybe you should answer your own questions:
EH?
As for my own question, in the playoffs do I want Eriksson or Lucic, the answer is Lucic 8 days a week.
It's making the rounds in Moronville.